Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Cohen-Schultz Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$32k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$54kPhilanthropy$51kEducation$40kEnvironment$31kHealth$23kHuman Services$23kHousing & Shelter$8kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$2,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$427k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER FRANKENMUTH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$6,000
VARIOUS 501(C)(3) ORGANIZATIONS$5,933
LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
LAND TRUST OF SANTA BARBARA COUNTY$2,520
SANTA CRUZ SHAKESPEARE$2,500
SAN FRANCISCO BALLET$2,500
ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS$2,041
SECOND HARVEST$1,250
BLOOD CANCER UNITED$1,040
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY$1,010
POST$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%TRUE CONNECTIONS COMMUNITY PROGRAMS INC: $3k → 16%TRUE CONNECTIONS COMMUNITY PROGRAMS INC: $2k → 16%TRUE CONNECTIONS COMMUNITY PROGRAMS INC: $1k → 16%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $2k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $1k → 8%SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $500 → 8%ANIMAL ASSISTED HAPPINESS: $500 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
SD
IN
CA
MO
VA
AZ
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of Cohen-Schultz Charitable Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Cohen-Schultz Charitable Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$178k · 17 repeat orgs$36k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +87% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
16

Total granted

$178k
$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+87%
+13%

Still filing today

41%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentInternationalAnimalsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +37%
  • AA
    Animal Assisted Happiness Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +173%
  • LT
    LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $15k · revenue +310%

Funded once

  • ME
    MONTAGUE ELEM SCHOOL
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • WE
    WESTWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • AB
    AVON BREAST CANCER CRUSADE
    one grant, 2017 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
2
Sempervirens Fund

To ensure coast redwood forests in the santa cruz mountains thrive for generations to come. since 1900, sempervirens has protected more than 36,000 acres. learn more about our mission, vision, and strategic plan through 2030 at:…

Environment
3
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
4
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
5
University of California San Francisco Foundation

Organization's mission ====================== the university of california, san francisco(ucsf) is among the world's leading universities dedicated to advancing health worldwide through biomedical research, graduate-level education in the…

Education
6
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
7
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
8
Sutter Bay Medical Foundation

Mission statement: mission: caring for our patients first and our people always. vision: to be the most comprehensive, integrated and connected health system for getting and staying well. values: excellence - we deliver high-quality,…

Health
9
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
10
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
11
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
12
Habitat for Humanity Greater San Francisco

Habitat for humanity greater san francisco builds and sustains affordable homeownership opportunities for families in marin, san francisco and san mateo counties.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Land Trust of Santa Cruz County and the most unlike its peers is Crazy Horse Memorial Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VARIOUS 501(C)(3) ORGANIZATIONS — $35,493 · OtherVARIOUS 501(C)(3) ORGANIZATIONSSANTA CRUZ SHAKESPEARE — $16,560 · OtherSANTA CRUZ SHAKESPEAREIndividual grant recipient — $12,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPOST — $11,000 · OtherPOSTBRACHER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $9,062 · OtherBRACHER ELEMENTARY SCHOOLBRIARWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $8,995 · OtherBRIARWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOLTHETA XI FOUNDATION — $8,000 · OtherTHETA XI FOUNDATIONMONTAGUE ELEM SCHOOL — $7,444 · OtherMONTAGUE ELEM SCHOOLWESTWOOD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL — $5,110 · Other+15 more — $25,859 · Other+15 moreTHE FRANKENMUTH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $26,076 · PhilanthropyTHE FRANKENMU…The Livestrong Foundation — $2,080 · PhilanthropyThe Livestron…Animal Assisted Happiness Inc — $16,603 · Human ServicesAnimal Assis…TRUE CONNECTIONS COMMUNITY PROGRAMS INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesTRUE CONNECT…SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES — $4,022 · Human ServicesSUNNYVALE CO…SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION — $24,425 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISC…CRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $1,500 · Arts & CultureCRAZY HORSE …LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $14,500 · EnvironmentNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND — $1,500 · EnvironmentAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC — $1,030 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 · InternationalHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY — $1,710 · Housing & Shelter
Other$139,523Philanthropy$28,156Human Services$26,625Arts & Culture$25,925Environment$16,000International$2,030Housing & Shelter$1,710

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE FRANKENMUTH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $26,076 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION — $24,425 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Assisted Happiness Inc — $16,603 over 9y, 1.0% of budgetLAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY — $14,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHETA XI FOUNDATION — $8,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTRUE CONNECTIONS COMMUNITY PROGRAMS INC — $6,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetSUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES — $4,022 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Livestrong Foundation — $2,080 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY — $1,710 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER — $1,300 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $1,040 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC — $1,030 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FRANKENMUTH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BALLET ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds Animal Assisted Happiness Inc
  • Who funds LAND TRUST OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY
  • Who funds THETA XI FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TRUE CONNECTIONS COMMUNITY PROGRAMS INC
  • Who funds SUNNYVALE COMMUNITY SERVICES
  • Who funds The Livestrong Foundation
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY EAST BAY SILICON VALLEY
  • Who funds CRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NATIONAL NETWORK OF ABORTION FUNDS LILITH FUND
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST WILDLIFE CONSERVATION CENTER
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF NATAL INC
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL15.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Intuit Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Cohen-Schultz Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cohen-Schultz Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cohen-Schultz Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph