Skip to content
Coach V 212 Foundation at a glance

· Public charity

Coach V 212 Foundation

The mission of the COACH V 212 FOUNDATION is to support families and young adults facing domestic abuse, substance abuse, or breast cancer by providing educational opportunities which improve the quality of life.

$200k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Human Services$73kHealth$50kHousing & Shelter$30kCrime & Legal$30kYouth Development$20kPhilanthropy$20kAnimals$20kReligion$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 15 grants below total $167,500, the rows itemized in this filing. The $200,000 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $32,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k14 grants · $160k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$55k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARY ABBOTT CHILDREN'S HOUSE INC$20,000
VICTORY FAMILY CHURCH$15,000
FOSTERING FUTURES$15,000
THE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION INC$10,000
CROSSROADS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC$10,000
HOPEHOUSE SUPPORTIVE AND TRANSITIONAL LIVING INC$10,000
OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMEN$10,000
YWCA OKC$10,000
OKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY$10,000
UNITED WAY NORMAN$10,000
ROB & BESSIE WELDER WILDLIFE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION$10,000
PIVOT INC$10,000
WOMEN RESOURCE CENTER$10,000
BIG BROTHER BIG SISTERS$10,000
THE SPRING SHELTER INC$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $93k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 51% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 14%THE SPRING SHELTER INC: $8k → 15%YWCA OKC: $10k → 16%FOSTERING FUTURES: $15k → 14%BIG BROTHER BIG SISTERS: $10k → 15%YWCA OKC: $10k → 16%BIG BROTHER BIG SISTERS: $10k → 15%CROSSROADS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10k → 13%WOMEN RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 13%WOMEN RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$120k · 6 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

6 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
4

Total granted

$120k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+14%

Still filing today

100%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $108k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesCrime & LegalHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyAnimalsEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +3%
  • BB
    Big Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +9%
  • YW
    YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI
    2× · 2023–2024 · $20k · revenue +48%

Funded once

  • CC
    CLAY CROSSING ENDOWMENT INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • OM
    OU MEDICINE INC
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • AB
    AUSTIN BOX 12 FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Crisis Center Inc

The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.

Human Services
2
Women in Safe Home Inc Dba Wish

An organization that provides a safe place for victims of domestic violence, rape, sexual assault, and stalking as they make plans and arrangements to recover from trauma and begin new lives.

Human Services
3
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
4
Child Advocacy Center of Central Ok Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide hope-centered, trauma-informed, child-first services that unite law enforcement, child protective services (state and tribal), prosecutors, mental health professionals, and medical…

Human Services
5
Care Center-Child Abuse Response and Evaluation Inc Dba the Care Center

The CARE Center exists to reduce trauma for child abuse victims and their families, coordinate a multidisciplinary approach to child abuse investigations, and provide free, effective child abuse prevention resources and education.

Human Services
6
Northwest Arkansas Women's Shelter

The northwest arkansas women's shelter is committed to serving victims of domestic violence and sexual assault and empowering them to build lives free of violence.

Human Services
7
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

—
8
Casa of Southwest Oklahoma Inc

Court Advocate for Abused and Neglected Children

Crime & Legal
9
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
10
Okmulgee County Family Resource Ctr

Crisis intervention services and full shelter for victims and their children of domestic violence/sexual assault. Advocates for abused children in the court system.

Human Services
11
Oklahoma Pregnancy Care Network Inc

Oklahoma pregnancy care network is committed to assisting pregnant women and their families in need of compassionate, practical, and life affirming alternatives to abortion.

Health
12
Help in Crisis Inc

Our mission is to eliminate family violence, stalking, child abuse, and sexual assault through advocacy, education, counseling, support and prevention services.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Young Womens Christian Association of Oklahoma Ci; the most unlike its peers is Rob & Bessie Welder Wildlife Conservation Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
6/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Big Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc: $20,000 · Human ServicesBig Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma In…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI: $20,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF O…WOMENS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER INCFostering Futures: $15,000 · Human ServicesFostering FuturesCROSSROADS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCROSSROADS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INCTHE SPRING SHELTER INC: $7,500 · Human ServicesTHE SPRING SHELTER INCUnited Way of Norman Inc: $20,000 · OtherUnited Way of Norman IncVICTORY FAMILY CHURCH INC: $15,000 · OtherVICTORY FAMILY CHURCH INCCLAY CROSSING ENDOWMENT INC: $10,000 · OtherCLAY CROSSING ENDOWMENT INCOU MEDICINE INC: $10,000 · OtherOU MEDICINE INCAUSTIN BOX 12 FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherAUSTIN BOX 12 FOUNDATIONMARY ABBOTT CHILDREN'S HOUSE: $20,000 · Crime & LegalMARY ABBOTT …PIVOT INC: $10,000 · Crime & LegalPIVOT INCHOPEHOUSE SUPPORTIVE & TRANSITIONAL LIVING INC: $20,000 · Housing & ShelterHOPEHOUSE SU…CENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterCENTRAL OKLA…OKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $20,000 · HealthTHE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyOKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 · AnimalsROB & BESSIE WELDER WILDLIFE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Environment
Human Services$92,500Other$65,000Crime & Legal$30,000Housing & Shelter$30,000Health$20,000Philanthropy$10,000Animals$10,000Environment$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARY ABBOTT CHILDREN'S HOUSE: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Oklahoma Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF OKLAHOMA CI: $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetHOPEHOUSE SUPPORTIVE & TRANSITIONAL LIVING INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWOMENS RESOURCE CENTER INC: $20,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetUnited Way of Norman Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetFostering Futures: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTHE TOBY KEITH FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA HUMANE SOCIETY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPIVOT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetROB & BESSIE WELDER WILDLIFE CONSERVATION FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetCENTRAL OKLAHOMA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSROADS YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SPRING SHELTER INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El and Thelma Gaylord…Oklahoma City Communi…American Fidelity Fou…Harris Foundation IncSarkeys FoundationCommunities Foundatio…Kirkpatrick Family Af…Kirkpatrick Foundatio…Inasmuch FoundationTulsa Community Found…United Way of Norman …Wegener Foundation Inc
El and Thelma Gaylord FoundationOK24.1× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · American Fidelity Foundation · Harris Foundation Inc · Sarkeys Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc · Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · Inasmuch Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · United Way of Norman Inc · Wegener Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Coach V 212 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Coach V 212 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 78%
  • Crossroads Youth & Family Services Inc: 78% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Coach V 212 Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Coach V 212 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $190k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Coach V 212’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home