Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cm Herndon Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$200k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Health$210kReligion$175kFood & Nutrition$150kEducation$135kHousing & Shelter$110kAnimals$80kScience & Tech$50k
02FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $165k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLACK MOUNTAIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$25,000
TROSA$15,000
NC VETERINARY SCHOOL$15,000
DUKE DIVINITY SCHOOL$15,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$15,000
INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE$10,000
CARING HOUSE$10,000
PHARMASSIST$10,000
THRESHOLD$10,000
FAMILIES MOVING FORWARD$10,000
DURHAM RESCUE MISSION$10,000
MUSEUM OF LIFE AND SCIENCE$10,000
URBAN MINISTRIES$10,000
ASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY$5,000
A PLACE AT THE TABLE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $10k → 8%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $10k → 8%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $10k → 8%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $10k → 8%INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$880k · 19 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

19 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
2

Total granted

$880k
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+53%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $30k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DUKE UNIVERSITY
    5× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +49%
  • TR
    TRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $60k · revenue +5%
  • INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +66%

Funded once

  • BM
    BLACK MOUNTAIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2024 · $25k
  • AH
    ASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue +53%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Durham Home Inc
—
2
Urban Ministries of Durham Inc

Established in 1983, Urban Ministries of Durham provides case management to end people's homelessness, offer emergency shelter, free meals, groceries, clothing, referral to needed resources, workforce and life skills training, and…

—
3
Casa

To provide access to stable, affordable housing for people who are homeless or at risk by developing and managing rental communities.

Housing & Shelter
4
Durham Community Land Trustees Inc

Build strong communities by developing, managing, and advocating for permanent affordable housing that provides durham residents with low to moderate incomes a stable foundation for achieving economic security.

Housing & Shelter
5
Developmental Disabilities Management Assistance Inc

Carolina hill provides safe and caring emergency shelter and supportive services to homeless families focusing efforts to achieve rapid re-housing and developing skills and resources to maintain it.

Human Services
6
Triangle Family Services Inc

Triangle family services fulfills its mission of building a stronger community by strengthening the family through services in the following core program areas: family safety, financial stability, housing security, and mental health.

—
7
L'arche North Carolina

L'arche north carolina cultivates inclusive communities where people across the spectrum of intellectual and developmental disability identities live and flourish together.

Health
8
Urban Triage Incorporated

Urban triage transforms culture, institutions, and communities to ensure a humane future.

Philanthropy
9
Drueding Center

Drueding center has become a tangible expression of holy redeemer health system's commitment to families and an embodiment of its mission: to care, comfort, and heal. drueding center partners with our families to build the skills to heal…

Human Services
10
Secu Family House At Unc Hospitals

Secu family house at unc hospitals provides an affordable, safe, nurturing home away from home for seriously ill patients, their family members, and caregivers from throughout north carolina and beyond.

Health
11
Hospitality House of Northwest North Carolina

To provide food and shelter for the homeless

Housing & Shelter
12
Safe Harbour Inc

Safe harbour provides a continuum of housing and supportive services for homeless and nearly homeless individuals and families in our communities.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Housing for New Hope; the most unlike its peers is Inter-Faith Food Shuttle. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NC VETERINARY SCHOOL: $75,000 · OtherNC VETERINARY SCHOOLMEALS ON WHEELS: $75,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELSLOWES GROVE CHURCH: $75,000 · OtherLOWES GROVE CHURCHTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC: $60,000 · OtherTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INCURBAN MINISTRIES: $50,000 · OtherURBAN MINISTRIESPHARMASSIST: $50,000 · OtherPHARMASSISTFAMILIES MOVING FORWARD: $50,000 · OtherFAMILIES MOVING FORWARDMUSEUM OF LIFE AND SCIENCE: $50,000 · OtherMUSEUM OF LIFE AND SCIENCETHRESHOLD INC: $50,000 · OtherTHRESHOLD INCRESCUE MISSIONS MINISTRIES INC: $35,000 · OtherRESCUE MISSIONS MINISTRIES INCBLACK MOUNTAIN PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherWESTMINISTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $25,000 · OtherCRAYONS 2 CALCULATORS: $25,000 · OtherDUKE UNIVERSITY: $75,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVE…DURHAM LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 · EducationDURHAM LIB…INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $50,000 · Human ServicesCARING HOUSE INC: $50,000 · HealthHOUSING FOR NEW HOPE: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterA PLACE AT THE TABLE: $25,000 · Food & NutritionEMILY KRZYZEWSKI CENTER INC: $25,000 · Recreation & SportsASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,000 · Animals
Other$645,000Education$85,000Human Services$50,000Health$50,000Housing & Shelter$25,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Recreation & Sports$25,000Animals$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $75,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC: $60,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $50,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFAMILIES MOVING FORWARD: $50,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCARING HOUSE INC: $50,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetTHRESHOLD INC: $50,000 over 5y, 2.0% of budgetRESCUE MISSIONS MINISTRIES INC: $35,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHOUSING FOR NEW HOPE: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetA PLACE AT THE TABLE: $25,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetEMILY KRZYZEWSKI CENTER INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDURHAM LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds TRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC ↗
  • Who funds INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES MOVING FORWARD ↗
  • Who funds CARING HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds THRESHOLD INC ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE MISSIONS MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds HOUSING FOR NEW HOPE ↗
  • Who funds A PLACE AT THE TABLE ↗
  • Who funds EMILY KRZYZEWSKI CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DURHAM LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ASHEVILLE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Fox Family Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Duke University Health System Inc · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · Duke University · Barnes Family Foundation · The Forest At Duke Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cm Herndon Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cm Herndon Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cm Herndon Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cm Herndon Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cm Herndon’s filings →

    More from the funding graph