Skip to content

· Private foundation

Clumeck Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$92k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$158kArts & Culture$104kCivil Rights$50kHuman Services$45kRecreation & Sports$35kEducation$30kReligion$24kInternational$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $47k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION$25,000
BAY AREA CENTER TO COUNTER ANTI-SEMITISM$10,000
SF MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$10,000
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION$5,000
JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES$5,000
STANFORD MEDICAL CENTER DEVELOPMENT$5,000
HEBREW FREE LOAN$5,000
URJ CAMP NEWMAN$5,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$5,000
FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES$5,000
KQED$3,979
JEWISH HOME AND SENIOR LIVING FOUNDATION$3,000
CENTRAL SYNAGOGUE$2,500
SANTA CRUZ COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $10k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 10%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
PA
NJ
CA
MO
DC
HI
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$250k · 18 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
12

Total granted

$250k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+10%

Still filing today

50%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureInternationalFood & NutritionHealthEducationPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART
    4× · 2022–2025 · $40k · revenue +14%
  • FH
    FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $30k · revenue +29%
  • BI
    BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2025 · $20k · revenue +19%

Funded once

  • JS
    JCF-OPERATION SWORDS OF IRON EMERGENCY FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • CL
    CHABAD LUBAVITCH ON CAMPUS- PRINCETON
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
2
San Francisco Challenge dba AmericaOne
Recreation & Sports
3
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
4
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
5
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

—
6
President-Board of Trustees Santa Clara College

Scu is a catholic and jesuit institution that makes student learning its central focus, promotes faculty and staff learning in its various forms, and exhibits organizational learning.

Education
7
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education
8
Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles

We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…

Philanthropy
9
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
10
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
11
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
12
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma; the most unlike its peers is National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
12/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

URJ CAMP NEWMAN: $35,000 · OtherURJ CAMP NEWMANANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE OF B'NAI B'RITH: $20,000 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE OF B'NAI B'RITHSF MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ANNUAL FUND: $20,000 · OtherSF MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ANNUAL FUNDJCF-OPERATION SWORDS OF IRON EMERGENCY FUND: $20,000 · OtherJCF-OPERATION SWORDS OF IRON EMERGENCY FUNDHEBREW FREE LOAN OF SAN FRANCISCO: $15,000 · OtherHEBREW FREE LOAN OF SAN FRANCISCOANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $15,000 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUEPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA: $10,000 · OtherBAY AREA CENTER TO COUNTER ANTI-SEMITISM: $10,000 · OtherJEWISH SENIOR LIVING GROUP: $10,000 · Other+17 more: $54,450 · Other+17 moreJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $150,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SA…+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropySAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $40,000 · Arts & CultureSAN FRANCISCO MUS…FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureFACING HISTORY & …KQED INC: $11,118 · Arts & CultureKQED INC+1 more: $608 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $35,000 · Human ServicesTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $20,000 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $20,000 · InternationalHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10,000 · Public Benefit
Other$209,450Philanthropy$155,000Arts & Culture$81,726Human Services$35,000Education$20,500International$20,000Public Benefit$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA: $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES: $35,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $30,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKQED INC: $11,118 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH SENIOR LIVING GROUP: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE JEWISH HOME AND SENIOR LIVING FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAY AREA CANCER CONNECTIONS: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $608 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChallenge Success: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF SAN FRANCISCO THE PENINSULA MARIN & SONOMA ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC ↗
  • Who funds BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds KQED INC ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH SENIOR LIVING GROUP ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH HOME AND SENIOR LIVING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds SECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BAY AREA CANCER CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds THE PENINSULA BRIDGE PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC ↗
  • Who funds Challenge Success ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & SonomaCA15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clumeck Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clumeck Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Clumeck’s filings →

    More from the funding graph