Skip to content

· Private foundation

Close Friend Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$39k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$70kHealth$59kHuman Services$46kAnimals$43kYouth Development$10kEnvironment$10kScience & Tech$5kPhilanthropy$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$494k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LEE HEALTH FOUNDATION$25,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$1,100
THE DUBIN CENTER$1,000
APPALACHIAN HEALTHCARE FDN$1,000
THE BRIDGE FUND$500
HIGH COUNTRY BREAST CANCER FDN$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $800) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HOPE HOSPICE: $100 → 11%HIGH COUNTRY BREAST CANCER FDN: $100 → 21%HIGH COUNTRY BREAST CANCER FDN: $100 → 21%HIGH COUNTRY BREAST CANCER FDN: $100 → 21%HIGH COUNTRY BREAST CANCER FDN: $100 → 21%HIGH COUNTRY BREAST CANCER FDN: $100 → 21%HIGH COUNTRY BREAST CANCER FDN: $100 → 21%HIGH COUNTRY BREAST CANCER FDN: $100 → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$153k · 8 repeat orgs$92k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
12

Total granted

$153k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+43%

Still filing today

25%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentAnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GC
    GOLISANO CHILDREN'S HOSP OF SW FL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $71k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    3× · 2017–2025 · $50k
  • LM
    LEE MEM HEALTH SYSTEM FDN
    2× · 2022–2024 · $20k

Funded once

  • AF
    AUDUBON FLORIDA
    one grant, 2024 · $40k
  • PC
    PACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $10k · revenue +43%
  • AS
    APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +122%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Partners for Breast Cancer Careinc

To provide public education and assistance to those without necessary resources and whom have the need for diagnosis and treatment of breast disease.

Health
2
The Womens Care Florida Foundation
—
3
Baker Senior Center Naples Inc

To provide confidence, connection and support to seniors living in collier and southern lee counties.

Human Services
4
Florida Breast Cancer Coalition Research Foundation Inc

To save the lives of those impacted by breast cancer by supporting sscientific research, community education, public policy through advocacy, and community-based organizations.

Health
5
Au Medical Center Inc

Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…

Education
6
Central Florida Advanced Nursi

To foster and encourage to promote and improve the care given to patients

Environment
7
WakeMed

The mission of wakemed is to improve the health and well-being of our community with outstanding and compassionate care to all.

Health
8
Wellstar Mcg Health Inc

Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice.

—
9
Au Medical Associates Inc

Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…

Health
10
Wellstar Health System Inc

Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…

Health
11
The Rose

The mission of the rose is saving lives through quality breast health services, advocacy and access to care for all.

—
12
West Georgia Medical Center Inc

Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pace Center for Girlsinc; the most unlike its peers is High Country Breast Cancer Found. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
5/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOLISANO CHILDREN'S HOSP OF SW FL: $70,800 · OtherGOLISANO CHILDREN'S HOSP OF SW FLIndividual grant recipient: $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAUDUBON FLORIDA: $40,000 · OtherAUDUBON FLORIDALEE MEM HEALTH SYSTEM FDN: $20,000 · OtherLEE MEM HEALTH SYSTEM FDN+13 more: $28,558 · Other+13 moreLEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · PhilanthropyLEE MEMORIA…+1 more: $500 · PhilanthropyPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $10,060 · Youth DevelopmentWATAUGA HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,075 · AnimalsALVIN A DUBIN ALZHEIMER'S RESOURCE CENTER INC: $1,000 · HealthHigh Country Breast Cancer Found: $700 · Human ServicesHOPE HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $100 · Human ServicesARTIS-NAPLES INC: $500 · Arts & Culture
Other$209,358Philanthropy$25,500Youth Development$10,060Animals$2,075Health$1,000Human Services$800Arts & Culture$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC: $10,060 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $4,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWATAUGA HUMANE SOCIETY: $2,075 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetALVIN A DUBIN ALZHEIMER'S RESOURCE CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHigh Country Breast Cancer Found: $700 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BRIDGE FUND: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEE MEMORIAL HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WATAUGA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ALVIN A DUBIN ALZHEIMER'S RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds High Country Breast Cancer Found ↗
  • Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIDGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOSPICE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN10.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Close Friend Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Close Friend Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Close Friend Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Close Friend Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Close Friend’s filings →

More from the funding graph