Skip to content

· Private foundation

Clifton and Clara Ward Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$799k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.5MHealth$1.4MReligion$590kPhilanthropy$410kHuman Services$350kCrime & Legal$225kYouth Development$70k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k8 grants · $150k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $685k
  • $250k+1 grant · $799k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRYAN COLLEGE CLARA WARD SCHOOL OF NURSING$799,061
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF FOX RIVER VALLEY$200,000
THE GENEROSITY TRUST$135,000
CASA KANE COUNTY$100,000
WILLIAMSBURG COMMUNITY CHAPEL$100,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER CHATTANOOGA$75,000
LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY$75,000
HAGGAI INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEADERSHIP TRAINING$25,000
BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE$20,000
TEACHING TO TEACH$20,000
BIBLE IN THE SCHOOLS$20,000
ANKERBERG THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE$20,000
NATIONAL CENTER FOR YOUTH ISSUES$15,000
LIFE ACTION MINISTRIES$15,000
IDEALS FOUNDATION$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $170k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RENEW THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $50k → 10%BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE: $25k → 12%BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE: $25k → 12%BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE: $25k → 12%BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE: $25k → 12%BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE: $20k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 13 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against -31% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
3

Total granted

$3.0M
$155k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
-31%

Still filing today

85%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HAGGAI INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEADERSHIP TRAINING INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $125k · revenue +40%
  • BB
    Bethel Bible Village
    5× · 2020–2025 · $120k · revenue +31%
  • LA
    LIFE ACTION MINISTRIES
    5× · 2020–2025 · $75k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • BB
    BRAINERD BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • RT
    RENEW THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue -31%
  • LV
    LOOKOUT VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

—
3
Bethlehem Christian Academy Llc

The academy will seek to create a desire to know and serve god in the hearts of our students by equipping them academically, physically, spiritually, and socially to fulfill god's purpose for their lives.

Education
4
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

—
5
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
6
Faith Baptist Bible College

Post secondary and graduate educational institution The mission of Faith Baptist Bible College and Theological Seminary is to equip vocational Christian workers and other servant leaders while inspiring them to take the Word to the world.

Education
7
Arborbrook Christian Academy

Arborbrook Christian Academy partners with parents to equip, empower, and encourage students to cultivate godly character, pursue life-long learning, and love the Lord Jesus Christ.

Education
8
Central Christian College of the Bible

Central christian college of the bible (central) exists to develop servant-leaders for the church. as a traditional undergraduate bible college of the restoration movement, central equips faithful men and women for leadership ministry.

Education
9
Charlotte Christian College & Theological Seminary

To educate, train, and develop ministers, evangelists, missionaries, and other people who are going to enter the Christian ministry. Educate ministers and missionaries to serve the Lord.

Religion
10
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
11
Manna University

Manna University is a biblical higher education institution dedicated to educating, equipping, and empowering emerging leaders to change the world.

Education
12
Legacy Ministries International

Through prayerful dependence on god, dayton christian schools (lmi) provides a biblically integrated, academically rigorous educational experience. instilling in students a love for christ and god's word, a love for learning, and a love…

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Haggai International Institute for Advanced Leadership Training Inc; the most unlike its peers is Ideals Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BRYAN COLLEGE CLARA WARD SCHOOL OF NURSING: $799,061 · OtherBRYAN COLLEGE CLARA WARD SCHOOL OF NURSINGDREAM CATCHERS: $565,000 · OtherDREAM CATCHERSCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF FOX RIVER VALLEY: $200,000 · OtherCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF FOX RIVER VALLEYBRAINERD BAPTIST CHURCH: $100,000 · OtherWILLIAMSBURG COMMUNITY CHAPEL: $100,000 · OtherLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $75,000 · Other+5 more: $145,000 · Other+5 moreBRYAN COLLEGE: $1,300,000 · EducationBRYAN COLLEGEPUBLIC SCHOOL BIBLE STUDY COMMITTEE: $65,000 · EducationIDEALS FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 · EducationSHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE: $180,000 · Human ServicesBethel Bible Village: $120,000 · Human ServicesRENEW THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $50,000 · Human ServicesCASA KANE COUNTY: $225,000 · Civil RightsCHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $135,000 · PhilanthropyThe Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc: $75,000 · PhilanthropyHAGGAI INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEADERSHIP TRAINING INC: $125,000 · ReligionLIFE ACTION MINISTRIES: $75,000 · ReligionANKERBERG THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $120,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$1,984,061Education$1,430,000Human Services$350,000Civil Rights$225,000Philanthropy$210,000Religion$200,000Arts & Culture$120,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBRYAN COLLEGE: $1,300,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetDREAM CATCHERS: $565,000 over 4y, 40% of budgetCASA KANE COUNTY: $225,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetSHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE: $180,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetHAGGAI INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEADERSHIP TRAINING INC: $125,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBethel Bible Village: $120,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetANKERBERG THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE: $120,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetLIFE ACTION MINISTRIES: $75,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY: $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPUBLIC SCHOOL BIBLE STUDY COMMITTEE: $65,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetIDEALS FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 over 5y, 10% of budgetNATIONAL CENTER FOR YOUTH ISSUES: $60,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetRENEW THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BRYAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds DREAM CATCHERS ↗
  • Who funds CASA KANE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds SHAOHANNAHS HOPE INC dba SHOW HOPE ↗
  • Who funds CHATTANOOGA CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAGGAI INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED LEADERSHIP TRAINING INC ↗
  • Who funds Bethel Bible Village ↗
  • Who funds ANKERBERG THEOLOGICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds LIFE ACTION MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds LIPSCOMB UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds The Community Foundation of Greater Chattanooga Inc ↗
  • Who funds PUBLIC SCHOOL BIBLE STUDY COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds IDEALS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CENTER FOR YOUTH ISSUES ↗
  • Who funds RENEW THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Joe and Velma Dewitt FoundationTN17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Joe and Velma Dewitt Foundation · Weldon F Osborne Foundation Inc · Chattanooga Christian Community Foundation · Robert L & Kathrina H Maclellan Founda Foundation · Hugh and Charlotte Maclellan Charitable Charitable Trust · The Maclellan Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clifton and Clara Ward Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clifton and Clara Ward Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Clifton and Clara Ward Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Clifton and Clara Ward Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Clifton and Clara Ward’s filings →

    More from the funding graph