· Private foundation
Clifford a & Lillian C Peeler Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $58k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $90k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NAZARETH CHILD & FAMILY CONNECTION | $50,000 |
| ST JOHNS LUTHERAN CHURCH CDC | $36,381 |
| MEALS ON WHEELS OF ROWAN COUNTY | $25,000 |
| PARTNERS IN LEARNING CDC | $15,592 |
| ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES | $13,379 |
| LUTHERAN SERVICES FOR THE AGING | $9,356 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY | $9,317 |
| CAPSTONE RECOVERY CENTER INC | $8,925 |
| CATAWBA COLLEGE | $8,000 |
| SMART START ROWAN | $6,236 |
| LIFE CHOICES ROWAN | $6,236 |
| TRINITY LIVING CENTER | $5,198 |
| ROWAN-CABARRUS COMMUNITY COLLEGE FD | $4,659 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $624k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 16%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +95% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
14 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NCNAZARETH CHILDREN'S HOME INC9× · 2017–2025 · $456k · revenue +20%
- MOMEALS ON WHEELS OF ROWAN9× · 2017–2025 · $207k · revenue +365%
- RHROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES9× · 2017–2025 · $119k · revenue +78%
Funded once
- LCLIFE CHOICES ROWANone grant, 2025 · $6k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Providing primary health care and professional counseling services to all indviduals who need it.
We are a crisis pregnancy center offering assistance to all women with pregnancy related issues.
Hannahs Home is a Christ-centered life-affirming maternity home for women who are in crisis.
We are a Christ-centered residential care facility for pregnant women in crisis. We offer a safe home that provides shelter, food, prenatal/postpartum care, spiritual, mental, financial, rides to medical appointments, educational and…
To help women in crisis pregnancies
The palmetto women's center in rock hill, sc is a non-profit agency serving the greater rock hill area since 1984. pwc offers pregnancy counseling, medical services, such as ultrasound and pregnancy testing, case management options to…
Provides medical, dental and pharmaceutical care to uninsured or underserved rowan county residents using paid and volunteer medical professionals and skilled support staff.
Provide services and support to persons regarding crisis pregnancies.
Promoting economic and industrial development in rowan county, north carolina
Willow pregnancy support serves women and families facing unplanned pregnancies by providing free pregnancy services, material assistance, and safe housing through the leitner greiner rose home.
Provide a community owned and operated shelter for a safe haven from domestic violence for women and their children in beaufort county, nc. provide counseling and guidance to allow these women to make decisions about their future.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Nazareth Children's Home Inc and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels of Rowan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NAZARETH CHILDREN'S HOME INC ↗
- Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF ROWAN ↗
- Who funds ROWAN HELPING MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds Lutheran Services for the Aging Inc ↗
- Who funds CAPSTONE RECOVERY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds CATAWBA COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds SMART START ROWAN INC ↗
- Who funds PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER ↗
- Who funds LIFE CHOICES ROWAN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Margaret C Woodson Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Rowan County United Way Inc · The Cannon Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation · Joe L & Hester Sims Family Foundation · The Hurley-Trammell Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Clifford a & Lillian C Peeler Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.