Skip to content

· Private foundation

Clay Foundation - East

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$500k
Granted FY2024still arriving
17
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$1.2MHousing & Shelter$585kHealth$450kHuman Services$390kPublic Safety & Disaster$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k13 grants · $300k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $200k
$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA$50,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$50,000
INTERFAITH FOOD SHUTTLE$50,000
RESOURCES FOR SENIORS$50,000
OAK CITY CARES$35,000
THE SALVATION ARMY OF WAKE COUNTY$30,000
FOOD BANK OF CENTRAL EASTERN NC$30,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
URBAN MINISTRIES OF WAKE COUNTY$25,000
WAKE SMILES$25,000
FIGS$25,000
RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION$25,000
ALLIANCES MEDICAL MINISTRY$20,000
THE SHEPARD'S TABLE SOUP KITCHEN$15,000
TRANSITIONS LIFECARE$15,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%URBAN MINISTRIES OF WAKE COUNTY: $25k → 8%URBAN MINISTRIES OF WAKE COUNTY: $25k → 8%URBAN MINISTRIES OF WAKE COUNTY: $25k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 18 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +75% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$3.0M
$30k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
0%

Still filing today

67%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $400k · revenue +100%
  • CASA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $235k · revenue +117%
  • RF
    RESOURCES FOR SENIORS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $220k · revenue +13%

Funded once

  • GD
    GOVERNOR'S DISASTER FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • MC
    MARIAM CLINIC
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Homes of Hope Inc

Provied temporary and emergency and low income housing and secured shelter.

Housing & Shelter
2
Carolina Family Health Centers Inc

Carolina Family Health Centers, Inc. provides accessible and affordable health care with excellence...where patients come FIRST

—
3
The Hunger and Health Coalition Inc

The hunger and health coalition relieves poverty and hunger for households experiencing economic hardship and food insecurity. we serve low-income and uninsured residents of avery, watauga and ashe counties who are forced to choose between…

Food & Nutrition
4
Allied Churches of Alamance County Inc

Provide food & shelter for the homeless, offer support to those that desire to develop or enhance their life goals and assist others in the community with financial assistance for emergency household utility needs.

Philanthropy
5
Raleigh County Community Action Association Inc

Raleigh county community action association, inc. empowers individuals and families to reach their highest levels of social and economical self-sufficiency, while identifying and eliminating causes of poverty. rccaa provides direct…

Human Services
6
WakeMed

The mission of wakemed is to improve the health and well-being of our community with outstanding and compassionate care to all.

Health
7
Grace Health Inc

To provide patient-centered healthcare with excellence in quality, service and access.

Health
8
Wake County Continuum of Care Dba Raleigh-Wake Partnership to End and Prev

Our mission is to leverage the power of community to address systemic causes of homelessness through coordinated response, education, data, and advocacy.

Housing & Shelter
9
Wake County Medical Society Community Health Foundation Inc (Dba Rightcare)

We connect, convene, and collaborate to increase access to quality healthcare, advocate for the underserved, and build stronger communities.

Health
10
First Choice Community Health Ctrs

Providing healthcare to the underserved population of Harnett County NC and the surrounding area.

Health
11
Family Promise of Wake County Inc

Moving families at risk of or experiencing homelessness into sustainable, permanent housing in our community through a continuum of support services.

Housing & Shelter
12
Warren-Vance Community Health Center Inc

The clinic provides primary healthcare in a spirit of compassion to limited income persons who are without adequate health insurance benefits in warren and vance counties, north carolina.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advance Community Health Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mariam Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MEALS ON WHEELS: $250,000 · OtherMEALS ON WHEELSFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL EASTERN NC: $235,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF CENTRAL EASTERN NCRESOURCES FOR SENIORS INC: $220,000 · OtherRESOURCES FOR SENIORS INCFIGS: $180,000 · OtherFIGSIndividual grant recipient: $175,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE SALVATION ARMY OF WAKE COUNTY: $170,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY OF WAKE COUNTYHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $95,000 · OtherHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for HumanityHOSPICE OF WAKE COUNTY INC: $75,000 · Other+2 more: $40,000 · OtherINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $400,000 · Human ServicesINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLEURBAN MINISTRIES OF WAKE COUNTY INC: $190,000 · Human ServicesURBAN MINISTRIES OF WAKE COU…THE RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION INC: $150,000 · Human ServicesTHE RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION I…RALEIGH-WAKE COUNTY DENTAL SOCIETY COMMUNITY DENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM INC: $190,000 · HealthRALEIGH-WAKE C…ALLIANCE MEDICAL MINISTRY INC: $100,000 · HealthALLIANCE MEDIC…ADVANCE COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $80,000 · HealthADVANCE COMMUN…+1 more: $5,000 · HealthCASA: $235,000 · Housing & ShelterCASAOAK CITY CARES INC: $105,000 · Housing & ShelterOAK CITY CAR…SHEPHERD'S TABLE SOUP KITCHEN INC: $85,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$1,440,000Human Services$740,000Health$375,000Housing & Shelter$340,000Food & Nutrition$85,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetINTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE: $400,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCASA: $235,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetRESOURCES FOR SENIORS INC: $220,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetRALEIGH-WAKE COUNTY DENTAL SOCIETY COMMUNITY DENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM INC: $190,000 over 8y, 11% of budgetURBAN MINISTRIES OF WAKE COUNTY INC: $190,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetTHE RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION INC: $150,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetOAK CITY CARES INC: $105,000 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetALLIANCE MEDICAL MINISTRY INC: $100,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetHenderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity: $95,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSHEPHERD'S TABLE SOUP KITCHEN INC: $85,000 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetADVANCE COMMUNITY HEALTH INC: $80,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHOSPICE OF WAKE COUNTY INC: $75,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INTER-FAITH FOOD SHUTTLE ↗
  • Who funds CASA ↗
  • Who funds RESOURCES FOR SENIORS INC ↗
  • Who funds RALEIGH-WAKE COUNTY DENTAL SOCIETY COMMUNITY DENTAL HEALTH PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds URBAN MINISTRIES OF WAKE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE RALEIGH RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds OAK CITY CARES INC ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE MEDICAL MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds Henderson County & Thermal Belt Habitat for Humanity ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD'S TABLE SOUP KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVANCE COMMUNITY HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF WAKE COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIAM CLINIC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Triangle Community Foundation IncNC19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Triangle Community Foundation Inc · John William Pope Foundation · United Way of the Greater Triangle Inc · The Leon Levine Foundation · North Carolina Community Foundation · W Trent Ragland Jr Foundation · Hillsdale Fund · Duke Energy Foundation · The Stewards Fund · WakeMed · The Curtis Foundation · Chaucer Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clay Foundation - East funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clay Foundation - East. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Clay Foundation - East’s filings →

    More from the funding graph