Skip to content

· Private foundation

Claws Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$19M
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$64MPhilanthropy$43MInternational$30MArts & Culture$26MEducation$17MSocial Science$13MHousing & Shelter$9.6MCrime & Legal$6.3MOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $800k
  • $250k+10 grants · $18M
$200,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$6.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA$5,000,000
THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY$3,000,000
DIA ART FOUNDATION$2,534,565
WOMEN IN NEED INC$2,025,000
ALLIANCE FOR DECISION EDUCATION$1,500,000
PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART$1,000,000
CALDER GARDENS$1,000,000
REFUGE POINT$750,000
FIDELITY CHARITABLE$600,000
HIRSHHORN MUSEUM$250,000
FRIENDS OF FACES$200,000
BOCA RATON REGIONAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$150,000
SAVE THE CHILDREN$100,000
FRANKLIN INSTITUTE$100,000
THE PUBLIC THEATER$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $14.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PHILADELPHIA CONTEMPORARY: $200k → 22%GALLOPNYC: $15k → 13%PHILADELPHIA CONTEMPORARY: $2.5M → 22%COVENANT HOUSE INTERNATIONAL: $3k → 17%PHILADELPHIA CONTEMPORARY: $2.5M → 22%GOOD DOG FOUNDATION: $3k → 17%ORPHANED STARFISH FOUNDATION: $25k → 17%ORPHANED STARFISH FOUNDATION: $10k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $3.0M → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $2.5M → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $2.0M → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $2.0M → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $25k → 17%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$166M · 42 repeat orgs$5.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 16 still active in FY2024, 26 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
20

Total granted

$166M
$4.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+8%

Still filing today

67%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $530k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesInternationalEducationSocial ScienceOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA
    6× · 2017–2024 · $30M · revenue +88%
  • TS
    THE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA
    4× · 2017–2022 · $13M · revenue +24%
  • RI
    REFUGEPOINT INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $11M · revenue +277% · 43% of their budget

Funded once

  • FF
    FIDELITY FREEDOM TRUST AND JUSTICE FUND
    one grant, 2019 · $2.3M
  • OM
    OPENDOR MEDIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.0M · revenue +97%
  • CF
    CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT THOUGHTgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +77%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
2
Peter G Peterson Institute for International Economics

The peterson institute for international economics (piie) is an independent nonprofit, nonpartisan research organization dedicated to strengthening prosperity and human welfare in the global economy through expert analysis and practical…

Social Science
3
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
4
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
5
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
8
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
9
The Roosevelt Institute

To create a nation where everyone enjoys a fair share of our collective prosperity.

Education
10
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greenwich House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Thomas Jefferson University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
50/50
Grantees still filing
36/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $43,410,000 · Community ImprovementFIDELITY INVESTMENTS C…+1 more: $250,000 · Community ImprovementSILVER VALLEY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $32,600,000 · PhilanthropySILVER VALLEY RESEA…PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $4,050,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMEN…+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $30,350,000 · HealthTHE CHILDREN'S …+5 more: $360,000 · HealthWISTAR INSTITUTE: $12,450,000 · OtherWISTAR INSTITUTEJERUSALEM ONLINE UNIVERSITY: $3,300,000 · OtherJERUSALEM ONLINE UNIVERSI…CALDER GARDENS: $3,000,000 · OtherCALDER GARDENSFIDELITY FREEDOM TRUST AND JUSTICE FUND: $2,250,000 · OtherTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $6,500,000 · OtherTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSI…ALLIANCE FOR DECISION EDUCATIONINC: $5,000,000 · OtherALLIANCE FOR DECISION EDU…INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $4,000,000 · OtherINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE+29 more: $12,227,580 · Other+29 moreTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $13,000,000 · InternationalTHE SHALOM HA…REFUGEPOINT INC: $11,000,000 · InternationalREFUGEPOINT I…Save The Children Federation Inc: $875,000 · International+2 more: $300,000 · InternationalPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $11,000,000 · Arts & CulturePHILADELP…DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $5,534,565 · Arts & CultureDIA CENTE…+9 more: $1,672,500 · Arts & Culture+9 moreWOMEN IN NEED INC: $9,585,000 · Human ServicesPHILADELPHIA CONTEMPORARY: $5,200,000 · Human Services+4 more: $55,000 · Human Services
Community Improvement$43,660,000Philanthropy$36,655,000Health$30,710,000Other$48,727,580International$25,175,000Arts & Culture$18,207,065Human Services$14,840,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND: $43,410,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetSILVER VALLEY RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $32,600,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA: $30,350,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA: $13,000,000 over 4y, 20% of budgetREFUGEPOINT INC: $11,000,000 over 6y, 43% of budgetPHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART: $11,000,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC: $9,585,000 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetTHOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY: $6,500,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC: $5,534,565 over 3y, 7.6% of budgetPHILADELPHIA CONTEMPORARY: $5,200,000 over 3y, 90% of budgetALLIANCE FOR DECISION EDUCATIONINC: $5,000,000 over 7y, 29% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $4,050,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $4,000,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE: $1,400,000 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetOPENDOR MEDIA INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetTHE REASON FOUNDATION: $1,000,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $875,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC: $750,000 over 4y, 8.6% of budgetTHE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE: $575,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetCOMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE: $400,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetNEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL: $355,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGREENWICH HOUSE INC: $340,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR INDEPENDENT THOUGHT: $250,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetBoca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc: $250,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC: $250,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE 52ND STREET PROJECT INC: $205,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetFRIENDS OF FACES: $200,000 over 1y, 42% of budgetALGEMEINER INC: $150,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetTHE AYN RAND INSTITUTE THE CENTER FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF OBJECTIVISM: $105,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetCENTER FOR JEWISH COMMUNITY STUDIES: $100,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetAtlas Economic Research Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetTHE BRYN MAWR HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetLANKENAU MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerica's Future Foundation: $35,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetOrphaned Starfish Foundation Inc: $35,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC: $32,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC POLICY RESEARCH: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SKIN CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PENNSYLVANIA BALLET ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGIVING ALTERNATIVE LEARNERS UPLIFTING OPPORTUNITIES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetWoolly Mammoth Theatre Company Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJUVENILE LAW CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDRAMA CLUB INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds SILVER VALLEY RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds THE SHALOM HARTMAN INSTITUTE OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEPOINT INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN IN NEED INC ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds DIA CENTER FOR THE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds PHILADELPHIA CONTEMPORARY ↗
  • Who funds ALLIANCE FOR DECISION EDUCATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds CATO INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds OPENDOR MEDIA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE REASON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds STUDENTS FOR LIBERTY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FRANKLIN INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ↗
  • Who funds GREENWICH HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT THOUGHT ↗
  • Who funds Boca Raton Regional Hospital Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds JERUSALEM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE 52ND STREET PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donors Trust IncVA20.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donors Trust Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · Susquehanna Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Armstrong Foundation · Garvey Kansas Foundation · The Horace W Goldsmith Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Snider Foundation · Charles Koch Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Claws Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Claws Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Claws Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Claws Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Claws’ filings →

More from the funding graph