Skip to content
Claure Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

Claure Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$585k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$2.2MArts & Culture$620kAnimals$553kHealth$499kInternational$495kHousing & Shelter$150kCivil Rights$89kSocial Science$86kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
  • $250k+2 grants · $500k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$25k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Aspire Institute$250,000
Aspire Institute$250,000
Hermanous De La Calle$50,000
Americas Society$15,000
Maestro Cares Foundation$15,000
Sereolipi Nomadic Education Foundation Inc$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $186k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Well Beings: $126k → 17%Well Beings: $60k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CA
MO
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 58% of Claure Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 20% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 16%.

Claure Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.9% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.2M · 18 repeat orgs$573k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
20

Total granted

$4.2M
$573k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+25%

Still filing today

89%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalEducationHealthCivil RightsArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    Aspire Institute Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +191% · 87% of their budget
  • TC
    THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $585k · revenue +13%
  • MC
    MAESTRO CARES FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2025 · $240k · revenue +581%

Funded once

  • FA
    Finn2finn Alliance Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $100k
  • RW
    Reporters Without Borders Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $87k · revenue +103%
  • NC
    Nicklaus Children's Hospital
    one grant, 2021 · $85k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
3
International Biomedical Research Alliance

Our mission is to invest in and accelerate the development of the most promising future leaders in biomedical research with global impact.

Health
4
Global Impact Investing Network Inc

The global impact investing network, inc. is dedicated to increasing the scale and effectiveness of impact investing to solve systemic problems facing people and the planet. impact investments are investments made into companies,…

Philanthropy
5
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
6
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
7
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
8
The International Institute for Strategic Studies - Us

To provide accurate, objective information and analysis on international strategic issues for legislators, diplomats, foreign affairs analysts, international business leaders, economists, the military, defense commentators, journalists,…

International
9
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
10
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
11
Alcides E Rosaura Diniz Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to raise funds and foster basic and translational research to identify genetic causes of specific cancers, understand how genes contribute to the disease, and use that understanding to help develop better…

—
12
Natural Resource Governance Institute

Nrgi envisions a world where natural resources enable fair, prosperous and sustainable societies, instead of undermining them. nrgi exists because decisions about how natural resources are governed determine the well-being of people in…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Cancer Cause Inc; the most unlike its peers is Well Beings. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
20/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Aspire Institute Inc: $1,500,000 · InternationalAspire Institute IncMAESTRO CARES FOUNDATION: $239,639 · InternationalMAESTRO CARES FOUNDATIONAMERICAS SOCIETY INC: $105,000 · International+3 more: $125,700 · International+3 moreCarrollton school of the Sacred heart: $200,000 · OtherCarrollton school of the S…Hermanous De La Calle: $150,000 · OtherHermanous De La CalleFinn2finn Alliance Inc: $100,000 · OtherFinn2finn Alliance IncNicklaus Children's Hospital: $85,000 · OtherNicklaus Children's Hospit…University of Missouri-Kansas City: $75,000 · OtherUniversity of Missouri-Kan…Well Beings: $186,000 · OtherWell BeingsReporters Without Borders Inc: $86,739 · OtherReporters Without Borders …DEBRIS FREE GLOBAL INC D/B/A DEBRIS FREE OCEANS: $82,739 · OtherDEBRIS FREE GLOBAL INC D/B…THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $60,940 · OtherTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC+9 more: $88,750 · Other+9 moreTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $584,500 · Arts & CultureTHE CARNEGIE H…MIND BUILDERS CREATIVE ARTS INC: $30,000 · Arts & CultureRANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC: $150,000 · EducationGRACE CHURCH SCHOOL: $150,000 · EducationDALTON SCHOOLS INC: $60,000 · Education+2 more: $11,030 · EducationCARE LOVE GIVE INC: $266,609 · AnimalsPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $210,000 · PhilanthropyDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $160,000 · HealthNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $20,000 · HealthDOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC: $10,000 · Health+2 more: $3,000 · Health
International$1,970,339Other$1,115,168Arts & Culture$614,500Education$371,030Animals$266,609Philanthropy$210,000Health$193,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAspire Institute Inc: $1,500,000 over 3y, 87% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION: $584,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCARE LOVE GIVE INC: $266,609 over 2y, 48% of budgetMAESTRO CARES FOUNDATION: $239,639 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $210,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWell Beings: $186,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $160,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGRACE CHURCH SCHOOL: $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAS SOCIETY INC: $105,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetReporters Without Borders Inc: $86,739 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetDEBRIS FREE GLOBAL INC D/B/A DEBRIS FREE OCEANS: $82,739 over 1y, 58% of budgetSEREOLIPI NOMADIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC: $60,940 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDALTON SCHOOLS INC: $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRAZIL FOUNDATION: $58,200 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetMIND BUILDERS CREATIVE ARTS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDowntown United Soccer Club Inc: $11,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEW ENGLAND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GO PROJECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget14 PLUS FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Cha…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Jewish Communal FundNational Philanthropi…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…The Ayco Charitable F…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…The Pfizer Foundation…Paypal Charitable Giv…Charities Aid Foundat…Network for Good
The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY18× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Network for Good

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Claure Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Claure Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 24%
  • International Institute of New England Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Claure Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home