· Private foundation
Clark-Halladay Memorial Foundation Mr Frank Higgins C/O Selden Fox Ltd
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 55% of CLARK-HALLADAY MEMORIAL FOUNDATION MR FRANK HIGGINS C/O SELDEN FOX LTD’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $110k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA | $20,000 |
| UCI FOUNDATION CANCER RESEARCH | $15,000 |
| K9S FOR VETERANS | $15,000 |
| UCI FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| ARF ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| PAWS GIVING INDEPENDENCE | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| HHH RANCH | $10,000 |
| HEARTS ALIVE VILLAGE | $5,500 |
| CARE FOR REAL | $5,000 |
| TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| RAN RIDE ASSIST NAPERVILLE | $5,000 |
| ORPHANS OF THE STORM | $5,000 |
| BRIGHT PROMISES FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $42k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
53 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 38 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2025 · $98k · revenue +83%- UOUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2021 · $60k · revenue +79%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +111%
Funded once
- ROREGENCE OF UNVERSITY UCI FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $20k
- LSLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POORone grant, 2024 · $10k
- NANOAH'S ANIMAL HOUSE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -4%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Aaf is a no kill shelter for domestic animals that have been abused and abandoned. aaf provides and coordinates adoption, spay/nueter, and educational programs, which aim to reduce and control pet population. aaf maintains temporary…
Our mission is to further the compassionate safe and responsible relationship between animals and people.
To promote humane treatment of animals by operating an open-admission regional shelter and providing lost and found services, rabies observation, foster and adoption services, affordable vaccination clinic, low cost spay and neuter,…
To care for pets, find them homes and save lives.
Chicago canine rescue foundation finds permanent homes for homeless dogs in our community with a specific emphasis on assisting the most vulnerable animals, who without our help, would have no other options. while in our care, they are…
Animal Care and Adoption - ARR's mission is to save the lives of homeless and abandoned dogs and cats. Our goal is reaching a no-kill society in the United States.
Animal rescues. pet adoption center. shelter cruelty victims. farm animals. wildlife refuge. spay/neuter. humane education. youth work. grief counseling. human health via pets.
To protect and enhance the lives of companion animals by promoting healthy relationships between pets and people. hsbv is an open admission, socially conscious shelter. hsbv provides safety net services, comprehensive adoption matching for…
The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…
To compassionately serve pets and the people who love them.
To support animals, save lives, and spread compassion.
Fur Fun Rescue's mission is to rescue, rehabilitate, and rehome abandoned, abused, and neglected dogs, providing them with veterinary care and training to give them a second chance at life. We are dedicated to promoting responsible pet…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Care for Real and the most unlike its peers is Niles Chamber of Commerce. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARF DBA ANIMAL RESCUE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds TABOR ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Paws Giving Independence ↗
- Who funds DON KRIZ YOUTH FARM INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA IRVINE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEARTS ALIVE VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds HHH RANCH ↗
- Who funds BRIGHT PROMISES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
- Who funds CARE FOR REAL ↗
- Who funds SAVE ABANDONED BABIES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Friends of Foothills Animal Shelter ↗
- Who funds ORPHANS OF THE STORM ↗
- Who funds THE WILD ANIMAL SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds CAMP KIDS ARE KIDS CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds NOAH'S ANIMAL HOUSE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DELTA GAMMA ANCHOR CENTER FOR BLIND CHILDREN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Greater Good Charities · Petsmart Charities Inc · Dave & Cheryl Duffield Foundation · The Grey Muzzle Organization · Western Union Foundation · The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals · The Duffield Family Foundation Dba Maddie's Fund · AbbVie Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Clark-Halladay Memorial Foundation Mr Frank Higgins C/O Selden Fox Ltd funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.