Skip to content

· Private foundation

Clarence L Robey Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$68k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$425kReligion$110kPublic Safety & Disaster$40kArts & Culture$22kHuman Services$5kFood & Nutrition$4kYouth Development$2kAnimals$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
Individual grant recipient$6,000
TREE OF LIFE MINISTRIES$5,000
PURCELLVILLE PUBLIC SAFETY CENTER$5,000
PURCEVILLE LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD$4,000
KETOCTIN BAPTIST CHURCH$3,000
FRIENDS OF FRANKLIN PARK ARTS CENTER$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
ST ANDREWS PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 4%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%TREE OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $5k → 4%TREE OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $4k → 4%TREE OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $4k → 4%TREE OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $4k → 4%TREE OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $2k → 4%TREE OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $2k → 4%TREE OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $2k → 4%TREE OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $2k → 4%TREE OF LIFE MINISTRIES: $1k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
OH
PA
UT
WV
VA
NC
SC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$561k · 57 repeat orgs$58k to everyone else

57 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
20

Total granted

$561k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+75%
+78%

Still filing today

11%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    Purcellville Public Safety Center Inc
    6× · 2020–2025 · $29k · revenue +102% · 36% of their budget
  • TM
    TOL Ministries Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +787%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF FRANKLIN PARK ARTS CENTER
    3× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +16%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $6k
  • TB
    THOMAS BALCH LIBRARY
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • PL
    PURCELLVILLE LIBRARY
    one grant, 2020 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
2
Washington and Lee University

Mission statement of washington and lee university: washington and lee university provides a liberal arts education that develops students' capacity to think freely, critically, and humanely and to conduct themselves with honor, integrity,…

Education
3
University of Lynchburg

The mission of the University is to inspire independent thinkers who become trustworthy, effective leaders that shape caring communities. The vision of the University of Lynchburg is to cultivate a world that is innovative, authentic, and…

Education
4
Fairleigh Dickinson University

Fairleigh dickinson university is a center of academic excellence dedicated to the preparation of world citizens through global education. the university strives to provide students with the multi-disciplinary, intercultural, and ethical…

Education
5
Virginia University of Lynchburg

To provide a solid liberal arts and christian education program to all students

—
6
Chapman University

The mission of chapman university is to provide personalized education of distinction that leads to inquiring, ethical and productive lives as global citizens.

Education
7
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
8
The Catholic University of America

As the national university of the catholic church in the united states, founded and sponsored by the bishops of the country with the approval of the holy see, the catholic university of america is committed to being a comprehensive…

Education
9
Emory & Henry University

Emory & henry university is a learning community in pursuit of excellence, engaging a diverse group of well-qualified men and women in educational experiences in which students confront historical and contemporary ideas and issues, and…

Education
10
Whitworth University

Since 1890, whitworth has held fast to its founding mission of providing "an education of mind and heart" through rigorous intellectual inquiry guided by dedicated christian scholars.

Education
11
Lawrence Technological University

To develop leaders through innovative and agile programs embracing theory and practice.

Education
12
Pacific Lutheran University

Plu seeks to educate students for lives of thoughtful inquiry, service, leadership and care - for other people, for the community and for the earth.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Elon University; the most unlike its peers is Purcellville Public Safety Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIRGINIA TECH: $24,000 · OtherPURCELLVILLE LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD INC: $24,000 · OtherMOUNTAIN VIEW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: $23,500 · OtherHARMONY MIDDLE SCHOOL: $22,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $18,000 · Other+65 more: $425,450 · Other+65 morePurcellville Public Safety Center Inc: $28,500 · Public Safety & DisasterTOL Ministries Inc: $24,500 · Human ServicesCHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $6,000 · EducationLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $6,000 · EducationElon University: $4,000 · EducationCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF FRANKLIN PARK ARTS CENTER: $6,000 · Arts & CultureLOUDOUN HERITAGE FARM MUSEUM: $915 · Arts & CultureBETTERALIFE INC: $4,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$536,950Public Safety & Disaster$28,500Human Services$24,500Education$18,000Arts & Culture$6,915Food & Nutrition$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPurcellville Public Safety Center Inc: $28,500 over 6y, 36% of budgetTOL Ministries Inc: $24,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF FRANKLIN PARK ARTS CENTER: $6,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetCHATHAM UNIVERSITY: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetElon University: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBETTERALIFE INC: $4,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOUDOUN HERITAGE FARM MUSEUM: $915 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Purcellville Public Safety Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds TOL Ministries Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN7.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clarence L Robey Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clarence L Robey Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Clarence L Robey Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Clarence L Robey Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 79 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Clarence L Robey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph