· Private foundation
Clarence E Mulford Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $49k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $133k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $80k
- $250k+1 grant · $549k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FRYEBURG ACADEMY | $548,511 |
| FRYEBURG RECREATION DEPT INC | $80,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $43,500 |
| EASTERN SLOPE AVIATION AUTHORITY | $33,500 |
| TOWN OF FRYEBURG MAINE | $13,100 |
| SACO VALLEY FIRE ASSOCIATION | $12,000 |
| PINE GROVE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION | $10,500 |
| SUNSHINE BACKPACK PROGRAM | $10,000 |
| WHITE MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER | $10,000 |
| NORTH FRYEBURG RIVERSIDE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION | $8,500 |
| MT WASHINGTON VALLEY ADULT DAY CENTER | $5,000 |
| LOVELL AREA FOOD PANTRY | $5,000 |
| TIN MOUNTAIN COMMUNITY CENTER | $5,000 |
| CHURCH OF THE NEW JERUSALEM | $4,500 |
| FRYEBURG RESCUE ASSOCIATION | $4,200 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
27 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $51k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FAFryeburg Academy6× · 2020–2025 · $2.8M · revenue +79%
- FRFRYEBURG RECREATION DEPARTMENT INC6× · 2020–2025 · $465k · revenue +52% · 34% of their budget
- WMWhite Mountain Community Health Center6× · 2020–2025 · $83k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- MSMAINE SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT NO 72one grant, 2020 · $75k
- TFTHE FIRST CONGREGATIONAL CHURCH OF FRYEBURG UCCone grant, 2023 · $24k
- DCDENMARK CONGREGATIONAL CHURCHone grant, 2024 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Fire protection
Volunteer Fire & Rescue - Provide emergency fire and medical first response to the Town of Franklin, VT residents.
Farmington public library purpose to promote reading enrichment and entertainment through education
Fire protection services for the town of somerville and mutual aid communities.
To provide emergency services to the towns of Cornish and Plainfield, NH
Volunteer Fire Department
Volunteer Fire Department covering the towns of Topsham and Orange Vermont
To supply food and consumables to locals
The spaulding memorial library provides library related services to the local community. the library is supported primarily through annual contributions from the town of sebago along with donations and fundraising from individuals.
Respond to calls for fire, search & rescue.
providing firewood to heat homes for those who are in need
The Forest Society of Maine conserves Maine forestlands to sustain their ecological, economic, cultural and recreational values.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fryeburg Rescue Association and the most unlike its peers is North Fryeburg Riverside Cemetery Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Fryeburg Academy ↗
- Who funds FRYEBURG RECREATION DEPARTMENT INC ↗
- Who funds White Mountain Community Health Center ↗
- Who funds SACO VALLEY FIRE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FRYEBURG RESCUE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UPPER SACO VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds NORTH FRYEBURG RIVERSIDE CEMETERY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds PEQUAWKET VALLEY HEALTH INITIATIVES ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST OXFORD COUNTY NUTRITION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH FRYEBURG COMMUNITY CHAPEL ↗
- Who funds Lovell Area Food Pantry Inc ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CONWAY PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds SACO RIVER RECREATION COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds CHARLOTTE HOBBS MEMORIAL LIBRARY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Stephen & Tabitha King Foundation Inc · The Robert and Dorothy Goldberg Charitable Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Clarence E Mulford Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Clarence E Mulford Trust?
Find your warmest path to Clarence E Mulford Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.