Skip to content

· Private foundation

Clarence & Jack Himmel Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$167k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$125k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Community Improvement$1.0MHuman Services$107kArts & Culture$85kHealth$75kCivil Rights$58kReligion$50kHousing & Shelter$32kAnimals$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$849k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SAY DETROIT$125,000
HOLOCAUST CENTER$12,000
U OF M HILLEL$10,000
NEW DAY FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES$5,000
HILLEL OF METRO DETROIT$5,000
GILDA'S CLUB$4,500
CABARET 313$2,500
HILLEL OF MICHIGAN STATE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $28k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MICHIGAN LEAGUE OF PUBLIC POLICY: $5k → 9%FOCUS HOPE: $8k → 21%MICHIGAN LEAGUE OF PUBLIC POLICY: $5k → 9%MICHIGAN LEAGUE OF PUBLIC POLICY: $5k → 9%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.4M · 21 repeat orgs$153k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

21 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
23

Total granted

$1.4M
$138k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+11%

Still filing today

43%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HM
    HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $28k · revenue +53%
  • DZ
    DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    4× · 2020–2024 · $26k · revenue +106%
  • VISTA MARIA
    4× · 2020–2024 · $15k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • IE
    ISRAEL EMERGENCY FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • GH
    GESHER HUMAN SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +36%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Business Leaders for Michigan

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

—
2
Organ Procurement Agency of Michigan

We honor life through donation.

—
3
Business Leaders for Michigan Foundation

Business leaders for michigan is a nonprofit, nonpartisan statewide organization driven by ceos from the state's leading employers, all working toward a shared goal: making michigan a top 10 state for jobs, talent and a thriving economy.…

Community Improvement
4
Detroit Food Policy Council

The organization was founded by a group of concerned citizens, working in cooperation with the detroit city council, to shape food policy and to work for a more localized, more just, and environmentally friendly food system. the…

Food & Nutrition
5
Jewish Historical Society of Michigan

Jewish historical society of michigan shares and celebrates the experiences and contributions of the jewish people, communities and institutions of michigan.

—
6
Michigan Enviromental Council

Informing and educating the public and decision makers about environmental issues.

Environment
7
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
8
Mymichigan Medical Center Midland

Creating healthy communities - together

Health
9
The Greater Detroit Health Transition Company

Gdahc mission: together with our partners, we empower and improve the health and economic vitality of individuals, organizations and communities by catalyzing the power of collaboration. gdahc vision: healthy people. healthy community.…

—
10
Hillel of Metropolitan Detroit

Inspire students to be active in jewish life.

Education
11
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
12
Michigan Farmers Market Association

Mifma supports the viability of all community-driven marketplaces so that they can connect all consumers to local farms and businesses.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service; the most unlike its peers is Dr Gary Burnstein Community Health Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAY DETROIT: $1,010,000 · Housing & ShelterSAY DETROITANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE - MICHIGAN CHAPTER: $50,000 · OtherANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE - MICH…PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $44,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOODKADIMA: $30,000 · OtherKADIMAJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE: $26,000 · OtherJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDE…ISRAEL EMERGENCY FUND: $25,000 · OtherISRAEL EMERGENCY FUNDHOLOCAUST CENTER: $24,000 · OtherHOLOCAUST CENTERVISTA MARIA: $15,100 · OtherGILDA'S CLUB: $15,000 · OtherCHILDREN'S CENTER: $15,000 · OtherHILLEL OF UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN: $15,000 · OtherHILLEL OF METRO DETROIT: $14,500 · Other+23 more: $138,400 · Other+23 moreHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC: $28,000 · Arts & CultureCABARET 313 INC: $12,500 · Arts & CultureTHE ARTS LEAGUE OF MICHIGAN: $5,000 · Arts & CultureDetroit Historical Society: $2,500 · Arts & CultureMICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $15,000 · Human ServicesFOCUSHOPE: $7,500 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $5,000 · Human ServicesDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $26,000 · AnimalsFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $21,000 · Food & NutritionGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $3,500 · Food & NutritionHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $20,000 · Philanthropy
Housing & Shelter$1,010,000Other$412,000Arts & Culture$48,000Human Services$27,500Animals$26,000Food & Nutrition$24,500Philanthropy$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAY DETROIT: $1,010,000 over 4y, 15% of budgetKADIMA: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC: $28,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $26,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFORGOTTEN HARVEST INC: $21,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetVISTA MARIA: $15,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCABARET 313 INC: $12,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetGESHER HUMAN SERVICES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOCUSHOPE: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ARTS LEAGUE OF MICHIGAN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetEversight: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE RAINBOW CONNECTION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDR GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $3,900 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDetroit Historical Society: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS MICHIGAN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAY DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds KADIMA ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds DETROIT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds FORGOTTEN HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds VISTA MARIA ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN LEAGUE FOR PUBLIC POLICY ↗
  • Who funds CABARET 313 INC ↗
  • Who funds GESHER HUMAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT MERCY ↗
  • Who funds FOCUSHOPE ↗
  • Who funds THE ARTS LEAGUE OF MICHIGAN ↗
  • Who funds Eversight ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW DAY FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES ↗
  • Who funds THE MIDNIGHT GOLF PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds THE RAINBOW CONNECTION ↗
  • Who funds DR GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds GLEANERS COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF SOUTHEASTERN MICHIGAN ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey FoundationMI24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · The Andrea and Lawrence Wolfe Family Foundation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · The Skillman Foundation · The Driker Family Foundation · The Jerold and Ellen Minkin Family Foundation · Marvin and Betty Danto Family Foundation · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · The Ravitz Foundation · Phillip and Elizabeth Filmer Memorial · Children's Hospital of Michigan Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clarence & Jack Himmel Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clarence & Jack Himmel Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Clarence & Jack Himmel Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Clarence & Jack Himmel Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Clarence & Jack Himmel’s filings →

    More from the funding graph