Skip to content
Claremont S Jackman Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx at a glance

· Private foundation

Claremont S Jackman Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$124k
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$221kHealth$168kYouth Development$162kEducation$151kArts & Culture$108kRecreation & Sports$80kEnvironment$44kPhilanthropy$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k45 grants · $114k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$2,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA of Northern Rock County$10,000
Wisconsin Masonic Foundation$6,174
GIRL SCOUTS OF WISCONSIN$5,000
GLACIER S EDGE COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF$5,000
Boys & Girls Club of Janesville$5,000
HEALTH NET OF ROCK COUNTY INC$5,000
MADISON 32 MASONIC LEARNING CENTER$5,000
SALVATION ARMY OF DANE COUNTY$4,500
SALVATION ARMY OF ROCK COUNTY$4,500
CEDAR CREST$3,500
START FOUNDATION$3,000
ROCK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$3,000
Agrace Hospice Inc$3,000
JANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER$3,000
MERCY FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 57% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%APTIV FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%APTIV FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%APTIV FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%APTIV FOUNDATION: $3k → 10%APTIV FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%APTIV FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%APTIV FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%APTIV FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%Wisconsin Masonic Home Inc: $3k → 5%Wisconsin Masonic Home Inc: $3k → 5%Wisconsin Masonic Home Inc: $2k → 5%WISCONSIN MASONIC HOME INC: $2k → 5%Wisconsin Masonic Home Inc: $2k → 5%WISCONSIN MASONIC HOME INC: $2k → 5%Wisconsin Masonic Home Inc: $2k → 5%Wisconsin Masonic Home Inc: $2k → 5%Wisconsin Masonic Home Inc: $1k → 5%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $2k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $1k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $1k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $1k → 10%JANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$970k · 55 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against -39% for those funded once.

55 repeat relationships: 38 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
6

Total granted

$970k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
-39%

Still filing today

47%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthArts & CultureHuman ServicesEnvironmentEducationPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JANESVILLE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $44k · revenue +576%
  • HO
    HEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +136%
  • CC
    CEDAR CREST INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +61%

Funded once

  • SA
    Salvation Army
    one grant, 2017 · $7k
  • HN
    HEALTH NET OF JANESVILLE
    one grant, 2022 · $6k
  • BS
    Boy Souts of America 620 Glaciers
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Janesville Foundation Inc
Philanthropy
2
Village On the Square Inc

Village on the square, inc. sponsored by the masonic fraternity, takes pride in meeting the social, physical, and spiritual needs of older adults through high quality independent housing and services, including housekeeping, dining,…

Housing & Shelter
3
Markesan Historical Society
—
4
Jefferson Chamber of Commerce

Promote economic development in jefferson wi for its members

—
5
Rock River Repertory Theatre

Inspire artists, audiences, and our greater southern wisconsin community to celabrate the art of theatre.

Arts & Culture
6
Wisconsin Rural Opportunities Inc

To foster the vitality of rural wisconsin, primarily through the promotion of education, improvement of health care services, cultural experiences, and support of the rural economic base.

—
7
Masonic Center for Health and Rehab Inc

Masonic center for health and rehab, inc., sponsored by the masonic fraternity, meets the social, physical, and spiritual needs of older adults by providing high quality housing and services in a skilled nursing facility.

—
8
Wisconsin Park and Recreation Association Incorporated

To empower and support wpra members by fostering professional growth, advocating for the parks and recreation profession, and enhancing the quality of life for communities across wisconsin through education, networking, and leadership…

—
9
The Northeast Wisconsin Masonic Library and Museum Inc
Arts & Culture
10
Park View Home Inc

Provide and furnish aid and relief to the distressed and hardship cases of aged members of society and to administer to the needs of the aged.

Human Services
11
Woman's Club of Wisconsin

The woman's club of wisconsin cultivates educational, cultural, philanthropic, and social exchange to inspire engagement in the community.

—
12
Wisconsin Veteran's Village Association Inc

Provide affordable housing, support, and community to veterans throughout their lifespan.

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wisconsin Masonic Home Inc; the most unlike its peers is Friends of Norwegian Culture Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 69 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
21/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Madison 32 Masonic Learning Center: $45,500 · OtherMadison 32 Masonic Learning CenterMADISON MASONIC CENTER FD: $45,284 · OtherMADISON MASONIC CENTER FDGirl Scouts of Wisconsin: $44,000 · OtherGirl Scouts of WisconsinYWCA of North Rock County: $39,750 · OtherYWCA of North Rock CountyTHE SALVATION ARMY: $34,750 · OtherSALVATION ARMY OF ROCK COUNTY: $34,750 · OtherGLACIER'S EDGE COUNCIL - BOY SCOUTS OF: $30,500 · OtherAgrace Hospice Inc: $30,250 · OtherYoung Men's Christian Association: $30,000 · OtherStart Foundation: $27,000 · OtherWisconsin Masonic Soccer Fdn: $23,250 · Other+41 more: $300,500 · Other+41 moreHEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC: $38,750 · HealthHEALTHNET…CEDAR CREST INC: $30,750 · HealthCEDAR CRE…EASTER SEALS WISCONSIN INC: $12,250 · HealthEASTER SE…THE GATHERING PLACE INC: $8,750 · HealthTHE GATHE…WISCONSIN MASONIC FOUNDATION: $61,500 · EducationHEDBERG PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $18,250 · EducationUW-WHITEWATER FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · EducationJANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $26,500 · Arts & CultureROCK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $24,250 · Arts & CultureFOLKLORE VILLAGE FARM INC: $12,500 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF NORWEGIAN CULTURE INC: $12,250 · Arts & CultureAPTIV FOUNDATION INC: $19,250 · Human ServicesWISCONSIN MASONIC HOME INC: $19,250 · Human ServicesJANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER INC: $6,000 · Human ServicesBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JANESVILLE INC: $44,000 · Youth DevelopmentROTARY BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $24,500 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF THE ARBORETUM: $19,000 · Environment
Other$685,534Health$90,500Education$82,750Arts & Culture$75,500Human Services$44,500Youth Development$44,000Environment$43,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWISCONSIN MASONIC FOUNDATION: $61,500 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JANESVILLE INC: $44,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetHEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC: $38,750 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCEDAR CREST INC: $30,750 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $26,500 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetROTARY BOTANICAL GARDENS INC: $24,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetROCK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $24,250 over 9y, 0.8% of budgetYMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUNTY INC: $19,750 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAPTIV FOUNDATION INC: $19,250 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetWISCONSIN MASONIC HOME INC: $19,250 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ARBORETUM: $19,000 over 9y, 5.3% of budgetWISCONSIN BADGER CAMP INC: $18,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetHEDBERG PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION: $18,250 over 8y, 2.9% of budgetFOLKLORE VILLAGE FARM INC: $12,500 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF NORWEGIAN CULTURE INC: $12,250 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetEASTER SEALS WISCONSIN INC: $12,250 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGLACIER'S EDGE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GATHERING PLACE INC: $8,750 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetWISCONSIN MASONIC CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetKANDU INDUSTRIES INC: $6,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRETIRED SENIOR VOLUNTEER PROGRAM OF ROCK COUNTY INC: $6,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetJANESVILLE COMMUNITY DAY CARE CENTER INC: $6,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSPIRIT HORSE EQUINE RESCUE & EDUCATION CENTER INC: $5,500 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetUNDERDOG PET RESCUE OF WISCONSIN INC: $5,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBRAILLE LIBRARY & TRANSCRIBING SERVICES INC: $4,750 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetDOWNTOWN JANESVILLE INC: $3,250 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetUW-WHITEWATER FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetRHINELANDER HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTHWOODS INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WISCONSIN MASONIC FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF JANESVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALTHNET OF ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds CEDAR CREST INC ↗
  • Who funds JANESVILLE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY BOTANICAL GARDENS INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCK COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF NORTHERN ROCK COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds APTIV FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN MASONIC HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ARBORETUM ↗
  • Who funds WISCONSIN BADGER CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds HEDBERG PUBLIC LIBRARY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FOLKLORE VILLAGE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF NORWEGIAN CULTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS WISCONSIN INC ↗
  • Who funds GLACIER'S EDGE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds THE GATHERING PLACE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Alliant Energy Founda…Community Foundation …Janesville Foundation…Jpc FoundationGreen Bay Packers Fou…Baird Foundation IncHerbert H Kohl Charit…United Way Blackhawk …Seneca Foods Foundati…Dorothy a Ashcraft Ch…George K Tallman Trus…Mercy Health System C…
Alliant Energy Foundation IncWI31.8× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Alliant Energy Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Southern Wisconsin Inc · Janesville Foundation Inc · Jpc Foundation · Green Bay Packers Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc · Herbert H Kohl Charities Inc · United Way Blackhawk Region Inc · Seneca Foods Foundation · Dorothy a Ashcraft Charitable Xxxxx7008 · George K Tallman Trust Xxxxx0004 · Mercy Health System Corporation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Claremont S Jackman Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Claremont S Jackman Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 69 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Claremont S Jackman Foundation Xxx-Xx-Xxxx’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home