Skip to content

· Private foundation

Clara Fairbanks Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$120k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$257kEducation$189kYouth Development$132kHealth$107kArts & Culture$97kFood & Nutrition$79kRecreation & Sports$36kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $79k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TERRE HAUTE CATHOLIC CHAR$16,700
TERRE HAUTE CHILDRENS MUSEUM$15,000
Individual grant recipient$15,000
Individual grant recipient$12,500
NEXT STEP FOUNDATION$10,000
ST JOSEPH UNIV PARISH CODA$10,000
PROVIDENCE FOOD PANTRY$7,500
RETHINK INC$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
MAPLE CENTER - INTEGRATIVE HEALTH$5,000
CHANCES AND SERVICES FOR$5,000
VIGO COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY$4,800
CROSSROADS CARE CLINIC - EARN WHILE$4,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,500
TERRE HAUTE WOMENS CLUB$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $128k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%HAPPINESS BAG INC: $23k → 19%SHINE FOSTER FAMILY RESOURCES INC: $5k → 19%FAMILIES BY CHOICE: $3k → 19%COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUSE: $14k → 19%COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUSE: $12k → 19%COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUSE: $12k → 19%COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUSE: $12k → 19%LEAGUE OF TERRE HAUTE INCORPORATED: $2k → 19%14TH AND CHESTNUT COMMUNITY CENTER: $15k → 19%14TH AND CHESTNUT COMMUNITY CENTER: $11k → 19%COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUSE INC: $9k → 19%14TH AND CHESTNUT COMMUNITY CENTER: $7k → 19%14TH AND CHESTNUT COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$740k · 25 repeat orgs$250k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

25 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
29

Total granted

$740k
$190k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+4%

Still filing today

56%
55%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $61k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NS
    Next Step Foundation Inc
    5× · 2017–2025 · $60k · revenue +551%
  • CO
    COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUSE INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $59k · revenue +46%
  • YM
    YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WABASH VALLEY INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $50k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • IT
    IVY TECH FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $25k · revenue +208%
  • HB
    HAPPINESS BAG PLAYERS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $23k · revenue +26%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $20k · revenue -23%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hoosier Families Inc

Hoosier Families is a non-profit organization that provides Community Based programs for Indiana children and families. Hoosier Families is committed to utilizing evidence-based practices to strengthen, rebuild and reunite the individuals…

Human Services
2
Family Service Association of the Wabash Valley Inc

Family Service Association provides counseling services to various clientele. Through various programs, clients are aided in family life and emotional situations.

—
3
Arc of Vigo County Inc

The Arc of Vigo County is committed to providing advocacy, parent support and training, respite services for families who have a family member at home with a developmental disability, a supported employment service for persons with…

Human Services
4
Catholic Charities Terre Haute Inc

Catholic Charities Terre Haute is a comprehensive, direct services agency whose purpose is to serve the poor, the homeless, the elderly, the neglected children and the needy.

—
5
Meals on Wheels of Evansville Inc
Food & Nutrition
6
Terre Haute Area Chamber of Commerce Inc

The mission of the Terre Haute Chamber of Commerce is to preserve, protect, and promote a business friendly envrionment free of obstacles to growth and development.

—
7
Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank Inc

The mission of Terre Haute Catholic Charities Foodbank is to feed the hungry in Clay, Greene, Knox, Parke, Sullivan, Vermillion and Vigo counties through a network of emergency food distribution member agencies and engage our community in…

Food & Nutrition
8
United Way of the Wabash Valley Inc

Advances the common good in the Wabash Valley by partnering with volunteers, companies and organizations to fund quality programs and initiatives in three core impact areas: Education, Health and Community Basics.

Philanthropy
9
Feeding Indiana's Hungry Inc

By drawing on varied resources within public agencies and the private sector, we hope to provide hunger relief for those in need throughout Indiana.

Human Services
10
Greater Lafayette Family Shelter Inc

To provide temporary housing and other support services to homeless families in the greater Lafayette area of Tippecanoe County, Indiana

Food & Nutrition
11
Voluntary Action Center of Northern Illinois

Voluntary Action Center, which serves Bureau, Dekalb, Kendall, Lasalle and Putnam counties provides high quality services that address the basic transportation and nutrition needs of its communities.

Philanthropy
12
Providence Food Pantry of West Terre Haute Indiana Inc

To provide food to those in need in West Terre Haute, Indiana

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels Inc; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Autism Resources Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/33
Grantees still filing
20/33
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VIGO COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDAITON: $88,000 · OtherVIGO COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDAITONYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WABASH VALLEY INC: $49,835 · OtherYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WABASH VALLEY INCCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $45,668 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTER: $45,577 · OtherCRISIS PREGNANCY CENTERVigo County Education Foundation Inc: $39,000 · OtherVigo County Education Foundation IncIndividual grant recipient: $28,229 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $27,050 · OtherVigo County Historical Society Inc: $23,831 · OtherTERRE HAUTE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $23,500 · OtherCHANCES AND SERVICES FOR YOUTH INC: $21,500 · Other+34 more: $241,801 · Other+34 moreCOUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUSE INC: $59,248 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL ON DOM…14th & Chestnut Community Center: $36,243 · Human Services14th & Chestnu…HAPPINESS BAG PLAYERS INC: $22,582 · Human ServicesHAPPINESS BAG …SHINE FOSTER FAMILY RESOURCES INC: $5,000 · Human Services+2 more: $4,500 · Human ServicesNext Step Foundation Inc: $60,100 · HealthWabash Valley Health Center Inc: $5,000 · HealthTeam of Mercy Inc: $5,000 · HealthTerre Haute Boys & Girls Club: $53,394 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTERRE HAUTE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $37,000 · Arts & CultureSheldon Swope Art Museum Inc: $1,720 · Arts & CultureARTS ILLIANA INC: $1,500 · Arts & CultureMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionMANNA FROM SEVEN INC: $12,000 · Food & NutritionIVY TECH FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationMIDLAND INSTITUTE FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP NFP: $1,000 · Education
Other$633,991Human Services$127,573Health$70,100Youth Development$63,394Arts & Culture$40,220Food & Nutrition$32,000Education$26,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNext Step Foundation Inc: $60,100 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetCOUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUSE INC: $59,248 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetTerre Haute Boys & Girls Club: $53,394 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WABASH VALLEY INC: $49,835 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetTERRE HAUTE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $37,000 over 6y, 1.4% of budget14th & Chestnut Community Center: $36,243 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetVigo County Historical Society Inc: $23,831 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetHAPPINESS BAG PLAYERS INC: $22,582 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCHANCES AND SERVICES FOR YOUTH INC: $21,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF HOWARD COUNTY: $13,600 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetreTHink Inc: $12,350 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetMANNA FROM SEVEN INC: $12,000 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetGeorge Pocock Rowing Foundation: $10,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTERRE HAUTE AREA MEALS ON WHEELS INC: $7,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTERRE HAUTE HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $6,554 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTeam of Mercy Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetTERRE HAUTE WOMEN'S CLUB INC: $4,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetWABASH VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $2,697 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetReach Services Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLeague of Terre Haute Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetARTS ILLIANA INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetFoundation for Autism Resources Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetOPTIMIST CLUB OF TERRE HAUTE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMIDLAND INSTITUTE FOR ENTREPRENEURSHIP NFP: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Next Step Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Terre Haute Boys & Girls Club ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WABASH VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds Vigo County Education Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TERRE HAUTE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds 14th & Chestnut Community Center ↗
  • Who funds IVY TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Vigo County Historical Society Inc ↗
  • Who funds HAPPINESS BAG PLAYERS INC ↗
  • Who funds CHANCES AND SERVICES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE ASSOCIATION OF HOWARD COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds reTHink Inc ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FROM SEVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds George Pocock Rowing Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL INDIANA INC ↗
  • Who funds TERRE HAUTE AREA MEALS ON WHEELS INC ↗
  • Who funds TERRE HAUTE HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Wabash Valley Health Center Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wabash Valley Community Foundation IncIN40.8× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wabash Valley Community Foundation Inc · Frederick R Benson Trust · Indiana Chemical Trust Tr Ua-Fdt 320006018 · United Way of the Wabash Valley Inc · Gregory L Gibson Charitable Foundation Inc · Max L Gibson & Jacqueline Gibson Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Weston Wabash Foundation · Hulman & Company Foundation Inc · Rose Ladies Aid Society · Hollie & Anna Oakley Foundation Inc · The George F and Marion D Johnson Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Clara Fairbanks Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Clara Fairbanks Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Clara Fairbanks Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Clara Fairbanks Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Clara Fairbanks’ filings →

    More from the funding graph