· Private foundation
Clampett Sara Elizabeth Tr Ima
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $32k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST DUNSTAN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $12,000 |
| SPCA OF MONTEREY COUNTY | $10,000 |
| CHILDREN'S FLIGHT OF HOPE INC | $10,000 |
| MONTEREY SYMPHONY | $5,000 |
| JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN | $5,000 |
| THE CARMEL FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| IN THE GAME MINISTRIES INC | $2,000 |
| THE FIRST TEE OF NAPLESCOLLIER COUNTY | $2,000 |
| THE FIRST TEE OF MONTEREY COUNTY | $2,000 |
| THE BIG SUR LAND TRUST | $1,500 |
| BETHEL BIBLE VILLAGE | $1,500 |
| MONTEREY PENINSULA JUNIOR GOLF | $1,000 |
| KIDS ACROSS AMERICA | $1,000 |
| CARMEL VALLEY TRAIL & SADDLE CLUB | $1,000 |
| EDUCATIONAL FILMS OF AMERICA INC | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +29% for the ones you funded once.
31 repeat relationships — 16 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCHILDREN'S FLIGHT OF HOPE8× · 2017–2024 · $66k · revenue +228%
- SFSociety for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County6× · 2019–2024 · $44k · revenue +78%
- MCMONTEREY COUNTY SYMPHONY ASSOC INC8× · 2017–2024 · $40k · revenue +111%
Funded once
- TVTHE V FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +111%
- SMSEARCH MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2017 · $3k
MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue +67%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the scga junior golf foundation is to develop an inclusive golf community that enables kids to thrive on and beyond the course. we believe that every kid in southern california, no matter their circumstance, should have the…
To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.
To improve the quality of life in monterey county and surrounding areas by providing grants to nonprofit organizations that benefit the community in the areas of youth, education, health and human services, arts and culture, and community…
The united states golf association champions and advances the game of golf. it serves millions of golfers and thousands of golf courses both within the united states and around the world through programs and services that promote a…
Southern california golf association's mission is to promote the game of golf.
The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
Mission Statement & Exempt Purpose: First Tee - Silicon Valley develops youth through golf. We enable kids and teens to build the strength of character that empowers them through a lifetime of new challenges. By seamlessly integrating the…
Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.
To create beautiful running events that promote health and benefit our community.
Santa catalina school exists to develop in each student a striving for excellence, a maturing awareness of moral and spiritual values, a sense of responsible purpose, and a determination to serve the world with courage, grace, and…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pga Tour First Tee Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Second Chance Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CHILDREN'S FLIGHT OF HOPE ↗
- Who funds Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County ↗
- Who funds MONTEREY COUNTY SYMPHONY ASSOC INC ↗
- Who funds The Carmel Foundation ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR GOLF ASSOCIATION OF NORTHERN ↗
- Who funds FUTURE CITIZENS FOUNDATION DBA THE FIRST TEE OF MONTEREY COUNTY ↗
- Who funds ROBERT LOUIS STEVENSON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
- Who funds Big Sur Land Trust ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Bethel Bible Village ↗
- Who funds KIDS ACROSS AMERICA ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE OF COLLIER INC ↗
- Who funds COASTAL COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PGA TOUR FIRST TEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LUNGEVITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ITP International ↗
- Who funds MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CARMEL VALLEY TRAIL & SADDLE CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds HORSE AND BUDDY THERAPEUTIC RIDING ↗
- Who funds WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds QUEST MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds NCGA FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Monterey Peninsula Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Barnet Segal Charitable Trust · Pebble Beach Company Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Clampett Sara Elizabeth Tr Ima funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.