Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC

RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC (California) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $626,174 to it, the largest being Claire Giannini Fund co Delagnes Mitchell & Linder LLP ($200,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2026
$482k
Funders on record
9
Grants received
$626k
Net assets
$183k
6/9 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 44%
01What it does

What Restorative Justice Partners Inc does

Mission

RJP, Inc. works with those affected by conflict, providing support and education to encourage accountability, empathy and reparation.

As stated on its FY2026 Form 990.

Programs

  1. SCHOOLS: 94%(268/283) of program participants rated the RJ Schools workshop/training as useful to better understand the use of restorative justice practices to support school climate and culture transformation. Workshop training provided to 297 adults, the team supported additional on-site support services for 15 adults with restorative practices, trained 22 Peer Mediators, and 165 students were supported through on-site services & peer mediation training by RJP, Inc. throughout Monterey County. Participants added: "The steps toward restoration and resolution are important and well explained."- High School Teacher (YORK) "[What went well was] Actually going through a circle ourselves. Although I tend to react negatively when we have to get up as adults and interact during meetings, but I think this was totally worth it. By going through the steps ourselves, it is easier to imagine what our students will need to do." - Elementary School Teacher (SCESD) "I thought doing a staff respect agreement was useful and beneficial as a school as a whole." - Elementary School Teacher (SCESD) Additionally, Restorative Justice Partners, Inc. enjoyed partnering with the following collaboratives…

    $70,788 spent$127,095 earned by the program
    16% of program spending
  2. VIP: Juveniles served: 12 Adults served: 54 Other interesting stats: Students reported increased confidence in their ability to define Restorative Justice (by 27%) from the start of the program. Programming is expanding across the county, now serving people housed in four residential facilities and serving 4 volunteer speakers. Participants added: "This class was so great. I learned so many things in how to communicate with my family and with other people." "I appreciate the speaker coming to tell her story." "To reassure justice to victims. That being a victim does not mean its your fault. Learning to not feel guilt or blame, and how it can take time to heal."

    $109,438 spent$118,575 earned by the program
    24% of program spending
  3. VORP: 83 youthful individuals were referred for Victim Offender Reconciliation Services. Additionally, 13 adult community members were trained to become VORP mediators Participants added: "I personally believe how i feel after completing this program is genuinely happy because this program taught me alot not just about how i feel but on how i make others feel and id like to take accountability on that because now i know to ignore and to move on and on how to use my coping mechanisms like going on walks to get steps in, spending time with teammates and working out." "I also understand how crime causes negative ripple effects by spreading harm to victims and communities. Instead, I want to create positive ripple effects by being responsible, working hard, and setting a better example. I am committed to making positive changes in my life and future." "What I learned from the Victim Offender Reconciliation Program is to take responsibility for my actions. My actions can impact the victim in this situation by harming them permanently or severely."

    $98,718 spent$43,523 earned by the program
    22% of program spending
  4. Circle training

    $176,819 spent$143,713 earned by the program
    39% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2026 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $455,763.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($341k) Expenses 100 ($325k) Net assets 100 ($94k)2018 Revenue 95 ($322k) Expenses 95 ($308k) Net assets 118 ($111k)2019 Revenue 132 ($451k) Expenses 139 ($450k) Net assets 119 ($111k)2020 Revenue 143 ($488k) Expenses 149 ($483k) Net assets 152 ($143k)2021 Revenue 121 ($414k) Expenses 127 ($412k) Net assets 158 ($148k)2022 Revenue 112 ($383k) Expenses 120 ($388k) Net assets 152 ($142k)2023 Revenue 113 ($386k) Expenses 117 ($380k) Net assets 159 ($149k)2024 Revenue 130 ($442k) Expenses 135 ($438k) Net assets 163 ($153k)2025 Revenue 117 ($399k) Expenses 122 ($397k) Net assets 180 ($169k)2026 Revenue 141 ($482k) Expenses 144 ($468k) Net assets 195 ($183k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Revenue (141)Expenses (144)Net assets (195)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2021 to 2022, from $277k to $199k (−28%).

$180k
$210k
$240k
$312k
$277k
$199k
$218k
$241k
$233k
$302k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2019 15% · 2020 17% · 2021 15% · 2022 8% · 2023 10% · 2024 39% · 2025 47% · 2026 0%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

35% of RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (94% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,802 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 10 reported years ran a deficit.

$16k
’17
$15k
’18
$505
’19
$5k
’20
$2k
’21
−$5k
’22
$7k
’23
$4k
’24
$3k
’25
$14k
’26
6.2
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Jennie Burciaga

Executive Director

As listed on its FY2026 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25'26
Listed10876688888
Joined·+5+3+1+2+3+1+1+1+1
No longer listed·742211111
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 4 funders to 3 funders, grant income fell $80k → $40k.

1 of 9 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 0% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 32% of grant income and the top three 77%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

32%
largest funder
77%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 50% · 2018 56% · 2019 55% · 2020 56% · 2021 46% · 2022 62% · 2023 62% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 67% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

75% of RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC's grant income comes from California funders.

NY
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $119 arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC's revenue grew 41% between 2017 and 2026.

Operating margin3% · below the median
Months of reserve6.2mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)4% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 71 crime & legal nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2026

Organizations like RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

97% of spending goes to programs.

Program 97%Management 3%Fundraising 0%

Governance

7
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

71%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC?
RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC (California) receives grants from 9 organizations whose IRS filings report $626,174 to it, the largest being Claire Giannini Fund co Delagnes Mitchell & Linder LLP ($200,000). 6 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC have?
IRS filings report 9 organizations giving $626,174 in grants to RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC, 6 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC?
Claire Giannini Fund co Delagnes Mitchell & Linder LLP is the largest funder on record, with $200,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PARTNERS INC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Restorative Justice Partners →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2026 (financials across 2017–2026), and the filings of 9 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing