Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cinnabelle and Benjamin Esterman Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$7k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$140kArts & Culture$49kInternational$46kHealth$32kHousing & Shelter$19kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kHuman Services$6kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$809k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EMMANUEL MUSIC$6,500
GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$6,000
SMILE TRAIN$2,500
ST FRANCIS HOUSE$2,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$2,000
Agrace Foundation$1,000
FIRE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $21k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $3k → 14%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $2k → 14%ON THE RISE: $500 → 8%PINE STREET INN: $1k → 16%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $5k → 16%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $3k → 16%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $2k → 16%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $2k → 16%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $2k → 16%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $1k → 16%ST FRANCIS HOUSE: $750 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
PA
CA
MD
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$285k · 23 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
18

Total granted

$285k
$40k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+115%

Still filing today

65%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GB
    GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $125k · revenue +89%
  • EM
    EMMANUEL MUSIC INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +101%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $20k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • MG
    Massachusetts General Hospital
    one grant, 2024 · $10k
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCHgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $8k · revenue +40%
  • AI
    Amnesty International USA
    one grant, 2024 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Commonwealth Care Alliance Inc

Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.

Health
2
Aclu Foundation of Massachusetts Inc

Aclu foundation of ma was established to defend freedoms guaranteed in the constitution and bill of rights through public education and litigation.

Civil Rights
3
Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation Inc

Massachusetts taxpayers foundation provides public & private sector decision makers with accurate, timely, unbiased research & constructive solutions that drive public policy in order to strengthen the state's finances & position the…

Public Benefit
4
University of Massachusetts Foundation Inc

The mission of the university of massachusetts foundation, inc. is to foster and promote the growth, progress and general welfare of the university of massachusetts as stated in the original 1950 articles of organization. the foundation…

Education
5
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
6
University of Maryland Anesthesiology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
7
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
8
The Bridgespan Group Inc

Bridgespan's mission is to build a better world by strengthening the ability of mission-driven organizations and philanthropists to achieve breakthrough results in addressing society's most important challenges and opportunities.

Community Improvement
9
Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

Our vision is to reimagine everyday giving to help charities. our mission is to enable the world's leading online platforms to create opportunities for everyday charitable giving. in doing so, we ensure our programs are trustworthy,…

Philanthropy
10
Massachusetts Housing Investment Corporation

Mhic's mission is to be an innovative private financier of afforable housing and community development throughout new england, providing financing that would not otherwise be available, and extending the impact of that financing to ensure…

Housing & Shelter
11
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
12
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint Francis House Inc; the most unlike its peers is Token Creek Festival Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
18/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $125,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INCEMMANUEL MUSIC INC: $30,650 · OtherEMMANUEL MUSIC INCIndividual grant recipient: $12,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientMassachusetts General Hospital: $10,000 · Other+22 more: $48,700 · Other+22 moreMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $19,850 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS…UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $16,750 · InternationalUNITED STATES…United States Association for UNHCR: $3,000 · InternationalUnited States…SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $14,750 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesPINE STREET INN INC: $1,000 · Human Services+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY: $9,500 · Arts & CultureWINSOR MUSIC INC: $1,000 · Arts & CultureKITCHEN SISTERS: $800 · Arts & CultureTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $8,000 · HealthAgrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc: $2,000 · HealthCASPAR INC: $1,000 · HealthFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC: $10,500 · Food & NutritionMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,500 · Animals
Other$227,100International$39,600Human Services$21,250Arts & Culture$11,300Health$11,000Food & Nutrition$10,500Animals$4,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $125,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetEMMANUEL MUSIC INC: $30,650 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $19,850 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $16,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC: $14,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC: $10,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY: $9,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $6,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $4,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUnited States Association for UNHCR: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetROSIE'S PLACE INC: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAgrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTOKEN CREEK FESTIVAL INC: $2,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetPINE STREET INN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASPAR INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWINSOR MUSIC INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetKITCHEN SISTERS: $800 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetON THE RISE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds EMMANUEL MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MOUNT AUBURN CEMETERY ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MASSACHUSETTS SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds United States Association for UNHCR ↗
  • Who funds ROSIE'S PLACE INC ↗
  • Who funds Agrace HospiceCare Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds TOKEN CREEK FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
  • Who funds CASPAR INC ↗
  • Who funds WINSOR MUSIC INC ↗
  • Who funds KITCHEN SISTERS ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CAMBRIDGE PUBLIC LIBRARY INC ↗
  • Who funds ON THE RISE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Boston Foundation IncMA12.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cinnabelle and Benjamin Esterman Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cinnabelle and Benjamin Esterman Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • On the Rise Inc: 39% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Saint Francis House Inc: 18% of income from government
  • Pine Street Inn Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Emmanuel Music Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Food for Free Committee Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Caspar Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Friends of Mount Auburn Cemetery: 1% of income from government
  • Rosie's Place Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Cinnabelle and Benjamin Esterman Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Cinnabelle and Benjamin Esterman Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Cinnabelle and Benjamin Esterman’s filings →

More from the funding graph