Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Chuck and Janet Andres Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$342k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$250k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

73% of Chuck and Janet Andres Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Centracare Health Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 9 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

01What you fund
01FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $47k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRACARE FOUNDATION$250,000
ROGERS POLICE ASSOCIATION$26,500
UNIVERSITY OF MN MEDICAL FOUNDATION$20,000
NORTHWEST FIREFIGHTERS CHARITY$6,000
METAVIVOR FOUNDATION$6,000
CARLETON COLLEGE$5,000
RUN INTO THE SKY INC$5,000
PARKINSON ASSOCIATION OF THE ROCKIE$4,500
Individual grant recipient$3,000
CORNERHOUSE$2,000
FIRST TEE - TUCSON$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE$2,000
THE POTATO HEAD PROJECT$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY24–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 98% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%NORTHWEST FIREFIGHTERS CHARITY: $6k → 15%THE POTATO HEAD PROJECT: $2k → 7%ST CLARE'S MONASTERY: $3k → 9%CARLETON COLLEGE: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%CENTRACARE FOUNDATION: $250k → 11%WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER: $1k → 14%ZEN BY CAT: $1k → 14%RUN INTO THE SKY INC: $5k → 15%PARKINSON ASSOCIATION OF THE ROCKIE: $5k → 12%METAVIVOR FOUNDATION: $6k → 6%FIRST TEE - TUCSON: $2k → 15%ROGERS POLICE ASSOCIATION: $27k → 11%CROSS: $2k → 11%ROGERS BOYS SOCCER BOOSTER: $500 → 11%ZIGGY'S ART: $2k → 11%CORNERHOUSE: $2k → 11%PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Arbor research collaborative for health is committed to improving patient care through research that shapes medical policies and practice. in particular, arbor research conducts health outcomes research on chronic disease and end-stage…

Health
2
Central Maine Healthcare Corporation

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustful environment through the expertise, committment, and compassion of our family of caregivers.

Health
3
Caring Cross Inc

Caring cross is focused upon accelerating the development and implementation of advanced medicines like car-t cell and stem cell gene therapies. in partnership with like-minded stakeholders, caring cross develops and deploys technologies,…

Health
4
The Parkinson Council

The parkinson council is the premier local organization dedicated to improving the quality of life for people with parkinson's, their care partners, and families. we invest in research, education, and programs provided by world-renowned…

Health
5
Carson Tahoe Regional Healthcare

To enhance the health and well-being of the communities we serve.

Health
6
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

7
Conway Hospital Community Services

Conway hospital community services provides outpatient health care services to horry county and the surrounding community in conjunction with conway hospital, inc., a non-profit acute care hospital system.

Health
8
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
9
Pcc Community Wellness Center

The mission of pcc community wellness center is to improve health outcomes for the medically underserved community through the provision of high quality, affordable, and accessible primary health care and support services. anchored with…

Health
10
Ccmh Corporation

Provide a healthcare facility offering acure care, skilled care, outpatient services, and emergency medical services to residents of carroll county, kentucky and surrounding areas.

Health
11
Canterbury Tower Inc

The organization's mission is to provide housing, health care, and other personal services to elderly residents through the operation of a continuing care retirement community in tampa, florida.

12
Center for Conflict Resolution

The mission of the organization (ccr) shall be to work with individuals, communities, courts, and other institutions to manage and resolve conflict.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cornerhouse and the most unlike its peers is Zenbycat. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CENTRACARE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $250,000 · HealthCENTRACARE HEALTH FOUNDATION+1 more — $4,500 · HealthROGERS POLICE ASSOCIATION — $26,500 · OtherROGERS POLICE ASSOCIATIO…UNIVERSITY OF MN MEDICAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MN MEDICAL…METAVIVOR FOUNDATION — $6,000 · OtherMETAVIVOR FOUNDATIONNORTHWEST FIREFIGHTERS CHARITY — $6,000 · OtherNORTHWEST FIREFIGHTERS C…RUN INTO THE SKY INC — $5,000 · OtherRUN INTO THE SKY INCIndividual grant recipient — $3,000 · Other+5 more — $8,500 · Other+5 moreCARLETON COLLEGE — $5,000 · EducationPEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC — $2,000 · Housing & ShelterCORNERHOUSE — $2,000 · Crime & LegalZENBYCAT — $1,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA — $1,000 · AnimalsCROSS (CHRISTIANS REACHING OUT IN SOCIAL SERVICES) — $1,500 · Religion
Health$254,500Other$75,000Education$5,000Housing & Shelter$2,000Crime & Legal$2,000Animals$2,000Religion$1,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCENTRACARE HEALTH FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON ASSOCIATION OF THE ROCKIES — $4,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERHOUSE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCROSS (CHRISTIANS REACHING OUT IN SOCIAL SERVICES) — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZENBYCAT — $1,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRACARE HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CARLETON COLLEGE
  • Who funds PARKINSON ASSOCIATION OF THE ROCKIES
  • Who funds PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC
  • Who funds CORNERHOUSE
  • Who funds CROSS (CHRISTIANS REACHING OUT IN SOCIAL SERVICES)
  • Who funds ZENBYCAT
  • Who funds WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charles and Janet Andres Family FoundationAZ20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charles and Janet Andres Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Chuck and Janet Andres Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chuck and Janet Andres Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Chuck and Janet Andres Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph