Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chrysopolae Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$694k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$1.9MPhilanthropy$669kHuman Services$659kEnvironment$432kHousing & Shelter$285kRecreation & Sports$163kReligion$160kCivil Rights$122kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k9 grants · $45k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $292k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $357k
$10,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$15M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Bay Homes$90,000
Community Homes Services$75,000
San Geronimo Valley Community Cente$75,000
The Thacher School$62,000
The Nature Conservancy$55,000
St Mary the Virgin Episcopal Church$30,000
San Geronimo Valley Presbyterian Ch$30,000
Millbrook School$27,000
Protect Our Winters$25,000
Sage School$20,000
Hamilton College$20,000
RotoRun Ski Club$20,000
Team Program$15,000
Schools Rule$12,500
Bridge the Gap$12,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $66k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 1% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%Oakland Lacrosse Club: $450 → 10%Thunder Dragon Fund: $40k → 7%Thunder Dragon Fund: $15k → 7%Swiftsure Ranch: $10k → 7%Marin Museum of Cycling: $1k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
WA
ID
MT
NY
OR
WY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
VA
AZ
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.3M · 48 repeat orgs$422k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

48 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 27 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

48
34

Total granted

$4.3M
$332k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+26%

Still filing today

58%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BAY HOME INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $669k · revenue +53% · 26% of their budget
  • TT
    The Thacher School Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $624k · revenue +32%
  • SG
    San Geronimo Valley Community Center
    8× · 2018–2025 · $561k · revenue +55%

Funded once

  • FO
    Friends of the Team Project
    one grant, 2019 · $30k
  • D
    Drake
    one grant, 2018 · $30k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $22k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Marin Academy

Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.

Education
2
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
3
Midland School Corporation

Midland school provides a distinctive co-educational boarding school experience to a diverse student body in grades 9-12. through study and work, midland teaches the value of a lifetime of learning, self-reliance, simplicity,…

Education
4
Pitzer College

Pitzer College produces engaged socially responsible citizens of the world through an academically rigorous, interdisciplinary liberal arts education emphasizing social justice, intercultural understanding and environmental sensitivity.…

Education
5
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
6
Terra Marin School

Our mission is to spark wonder and intellectual curiosity in each child. We achieve this through a purposeful blend of:Engaging academics custom-tailored to each child's abilities, strengths and interests;An unparalleled social-emotional…

Education
7
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
8
Mark Day School

Innovative and full of heart, mark day school nurtures each child to pursue their curiosity, think critically, embrace challenge with courage and joy, and work in partnership with others to build more caring and inclusive communities.

—
9
Pacific Ridge School

In a community that fosters academic excellence, ethical responsibility and global engagement, pacific ridge school prepares students for college and a purposeful life.

Education
10
Bosque School

To create transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate contribution to a more just world.

Education
11
Pacific Collegiate School

Pacific collegiate school's mission is to provide exemplary, standards based college preparatory and fine arts education for public middle and high school students of santa cruz county and bordering areas.

Education
12
Bridges Charter School

Our mission is to educate the whole child using a combination of innovative curriculum and instruction along with social/emotional education embedded in the program. students will be enabled to reach their innate intellectual, creative,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Youth Transforming Justice; the most unlike its peers is Bay Home Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
20
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/53
Grantees still filing
38/53
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

San Geronimo Valley Community Center: $560,725 · OtherSan Geronimo Valley Community CenterCommunity Homes Services: $285,000 · OtherCommunity Homes ServicesSan Geronimo Valley Presbyterian Ch: $120,000 · OtherSan Geronimo Valley Presbyterian ChTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $75,000 · OtherSchools Rule: $75,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $71,000 · Other+54 more: $803,525 · Other+54 moreThe Thacher School Inc: $624,300 · EducationThe Thacher School IncMILLBROOK SCHOOL: $212,000 · EducationMILLBROOK SCHOOLTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL: $145,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOO…THE SAGE SCHOOL INC: $136,000 · EducationTHE SAGE SCHOOL INC10000 DEGREES: $119,000 · Education10000 DEGREESBowdoin College: $85,000 · EducationBowdoin College+12 more: $218,500 · Education+12 moreBAY HOME INC: $668,950 · PhilanthropyBAY HOME INCPROTECT OUR WINTERS: $230,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $56,000 · EnvironmentRios to Rivers: $35,000 · EnvironmentGOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY: $23,000 · EnvironmentTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $122,000 · Civil RightsBridge the Gap College Prep: $45,000 · Youth DevelopmentROTARUN SKI CLUB: $38,000 · Youth DevelopmentINTERMOUNTAIN JUNIOR RODEO ASSOCIATION: $13,500 · Youth DevelopmentTRIPS FOR KIDS MARIN: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHUNDER DRAGON FUND INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesSWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $10,000 · Human Services+2 more: $1,450 · Human Services
Other$1,990,250Education$1,539,800Philanthropy$668,950Environment$344,000Civil Rights$122,000Youth Development$101,500Human Services$91,450

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBAY HOME INC: $668,950 over 8y, 26% of budgetThe Thacher School Inc: $624,300 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSan Geronimo Valley Community Center: $560,725 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetPROTECT OUR WINTERS: $230,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetMILLBROOK SCHOOL: $212,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL: $145,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SAGE SCHOOL INC: $136,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $122,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budget10000 DEGREES: $119,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBowdoin College: $85,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $75,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION: $56,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHUNDER DRAGON FUND INC: $55,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetPOMFRET SCHOOL INCORPORATED: $45,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBridge the Gap College Prep: $45,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetROTARUN SKI CLUB: $38,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetRios to Rivers: $35,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetHIGHER GROUND USA INC: $31,850 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL: $31,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYOUTH TRANSFORMING JUSTICE: $26,500 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetMarin Healthy Youth Partnerships: $25,000 over 5y, 7.1% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTrustees of Hamilton College: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY: $23,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAWHS FALCON FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Middlebury College: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetINTERMOUNTAIN JUNIOR RODEO ASSOCIATION: $13,500 over 1y, 32% of budgetWOOD RIVER TRAILS COALITION INC: $13,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetO-HIGHER ED: $10,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetTHE LIBERTY THEATRE COMPANY: $10,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCANAL ALLIANCE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSWIFTSURE RANCH THERAPEUTIC EQUESTRIAN CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO 61 EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetMeritus College Fund: $9,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget826 Valencia: $6,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTRIPS FOR KIDS NATIONAL: $5,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetSun Valley Community School Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO PARKS ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSCHOLARMATCH INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRIPS FOR KIDS MARIN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetBorder Community Alliance Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetFIRST DESCENTS: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Center for Investigative Reporting Inc: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCounterPulse: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BAY HOME INC ↗
  • Who funds The Thacher School Inc ↗
  • Who funds San Geronimo Valley Community Center ↗
  • Who funds PROTECT OUR WINTERS ↗
  • Who funds MILLBROOK SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE LAWRENCEVILLE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE SAGE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds 10000 DEGREES ↗
  • Who funds Bowdoin College ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THUNDER DRAGON FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds POMFRET SCHOOL INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds Bridge the Gap College Prep ↗
  • Who funds ROTARUN SKI CLUB ↗
  • Who funds Rios to Rivers ↗
  • Who funds HIGHER GROUND USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIN COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH TRANSFORMING JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds Marin Healthy Youth Partnerships ↗
  • Who funds GUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC ↗
  • Who funds Trustees of Hamilton College ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN GATE NATIONAL PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA31.8× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Spur Community Foundation Inc · The San Francisco Foundation · Boswell Family Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Helios Foundation · The Springcreek Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · East Bay Community Foundation · Nicholas Martin Jr Family Foundation · Nancy Eccles and Homer M Hayward Family Foundation · Robert and Dana Emery Family Foundation Rockefeller Trust Company

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chrysopolae Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chrysopolae Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • President and Fellows of Middlebury College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Chrysopolae Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Chrysopolae Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chrysopolae’s filings →

More from the funding graph