Skip to content
Christine & Katharina Pauly Trust C at a glance

· Private foundation

Christine & Katharina Pauly Trust C

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$35k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Youth Development$88kHuman Services$60kReligion$43kFood & Nutrition$37kHealth$33kEducation$10kRecreation & Sports$8k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$6,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$735k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING$10,000
OZARKS FOOD HARVEST$7,500
FOSTERING HOPE$6,000
OZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION$6,000
BRANSON SENIOR CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%LEAST OF THESE: $11k → 8%Branson Senior Center: $5k → 14%FOSTERING HOPE: $6k → 18%BARRY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $8k → 21%Branson Senior Center: $5k → 14%BRANSON SENIOR CENTER: $5k → 14%Branson Senior Center: $4k → 14%OZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION: $6k → 15%OACAC: $4k → 15%SENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$196k · 7 repeat orgs$82k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
6

Total granted

$196k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
+664%

Still filing today

57%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthCrime & LegalFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA
    5× · 2018–2023 · $50k
  • CO
    COUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF
    5× · 2017–2024 · $43k
  • BA
    BETTY AND BOBBY ALLISON OZARKS COUNSELING CENTER
    5× · 2017–2024 · $33k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • BS
    BOY SCOUTS OF OZARKS
    one grant, 2020 · $13k
  • LO
    LEAST OF THESE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue +664%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jackson County Council On Aging

Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes

Human Services
2
Ozark Senior Center

Providing services to Seniors

—
3
Southwest Kansas Area Agency on Aging Inc

To serve and enhance the lives of older people and their families in Southwest Kansas.

—
4
Sherman County Senior Center Inc

To offer a nutrition program for older persons.

—
5
The Christian County Coalition On Aging Inc

To provide home respite, housekeeping and other assistance to seniors age 60 and older that are residents of Christian County, Missouri

Human Services
6
Harrison County Council On Aging

Provide services & meals to the elderly.

Human Services
7
Central Missouri Area Agency On Aging

Aging Best's mission is to help people be as independent as possible as they navigate through life by delivering the best support, services, and programs.

Human Services
8
Harlan County Senior Services Inc

Offers programs & services to older persons such as meals, house keeping, yard work, public transportation, and social activities.

Human Services
9
Hickory County Cares

Food distribution to the needy

Human Services
10
Bread of Life Community Services
Food & Nutrition
11
Conway County Care Center

Provide Emergency services, services include food, clothing, utility payment assistance, rental assistance, school supplies, infant care and medical assistance for 10442 individuals

Human Services
12
Carthage Crisis Center Inc

The carthage crisis center is committed to restoring homeless and needy people to self sufficiency with god's help.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crisis Nursery of the Ozarks Inc; the most unlike its peers is Fostering Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $50,000 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICACOUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF: $43,000 · OtherCOUNCIL OF CHURCHES OFBIG BOTHERS BIG SISTERS: $15,000 · OtherBIG BOTHERS BIG SISTERSBOY SCOUTS OF OZARKS: $12,500 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF OZARKSBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB: $10,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF MID-AM: $10,000 · OtherCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF MID-AMOZARK TRAILS COUNCIL: $8,000 · OtherOZARK TRAILS COUNCILBranson Senior Center: $19,000 · Human ServicesBranson Senior CenterLEAST OF THESE INC: $10,500 · Human ServicesLEAST OF THESE INCOzarks Area Community Action Corporation: $10,100 · Human ServicesOzarks Area Community Act…SENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $10,000 · Human ServicesSENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON …BARRY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $7,500 · Human ServicesBARRY COUNTY COUNCIL ON A…FOSTERING HOPE: $6,000 · Human ServicesFOSTERING HOPEBETTY AND BOBBY ALLISON OZARKS COUNSELING CENTER: $32,800 · HealthBETTY AND BOB…CRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC: $26,000 · Crime & LegalCRISIS NUR…OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $7,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$148,500Human Services$63,100Health$32,800Crime & Legal$26,000Food & Nutrition$7,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBETTY AND BOBBY ALLISON OZARKS COUNSELING CENTER: $32,800 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetCRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC: $26,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetBranson Senior Center: $19,000 over 4y, 6.9% of budgetLEAST OF THESE INC: $10,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetOzarks Area Community Action Corporation: $10,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBARRY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $7,500 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTERING HOPE: $6,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BETTY AND BOBBY ALLISON OZARKS COUNSELING CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Branson Senior Center ↗
  • Who funds LEAST OF THESE INC ↗
  • Who funds Ozarks Area Community Action Corporation ↗
  • Who funds SENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds BARRY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
  • Who funds OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERING HOPE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Christine & Katharina…Community Foundation …The Hulston Family Fo…Commerce Bancshares F…Arvest FoundationStanley & Elaine Ball…Musgrave FoundationThe Charlie & Mary Be…Ozarks Food Harvest I…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Christine & Katharina Pauly TrustTX22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Christine & Katharina Pauly Trust · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · The Hulston Family Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Musgrave Foundation · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Ozarks Food Harvest Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Christine & Katharina Pauly Trust C funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Christine & Katharina Pauly Trust C. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Christine & Katharina Pauly Trust C’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home