· Private foundation
Christine & Katharina Pauly Trust C
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING | $10,000 |
| OZARKS FOOD HARVEST | $7,500 |
| OZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION | $6,000 |
| FOSTERING HOPE | $6,000 |
| BRANSON SENIOR CENTER | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $63k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 32% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BSBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA5× · 2018–2023 · $50k
- COCOUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF5× · 2017–2024 · $43k
- BABETTY AND BOBBY ALLISON OZARKS COUNSELING CENTER5× · 2017–2024 · $33k · revenue +28%
Funded once
- BSBOY SCOUTS OF OZARKSone grant, 2020 · $13k
- LOLEAST OF THESE INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $11k · revenue +664%
- CICOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF MID-AMone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provide services to local seniors to improve their quality of life and assist them in remaining in their homes
Providing services to Seniors
To serve and enhance the lives of older people and their families in Southwest Kansas.
To offer a nutrition program for older persons.
To provide home respite, housekeeping and other assistance to seniors age 60 and older that are residents of Christian County, Missouri
Provide services & meals to the elderly.
Aging Best's mission is to help people be as independent as possible as they navigate through life by delivering the best support, services, and programs.
Offers programs & services to older persons such as meals, house keeping, yard work, public transportation, and social activities.
Food distribution to the needy
Provide Emergency services, services include food, clothing, utility payment assistance, rental assistance, school supplies, infant care and medical assistance for 10442 individuals
The carthage crisis center is committed to restoring homeless and needy people to self sufficiency with god's help.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Crisis Nursery of the Ozarks Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fostering Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BETTY AND BOBBY ALLISON OZARKS COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds CRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC ↗
- Who funds Branson Senior Center ↗
- Who funds LEAST OF THESE INC ↗
- Who funds Ozarks Area Community Action Corporation ↗
- Who funds SENIORAGE AREA AGENCY ON AGING ↗
- Who funds BARRY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING ↗
- Who funds OZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds FOSTERING HOPE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Christine & Katharina Pauly Trust · Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · The Hulston Family Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Arvest Foundation · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Musgrave Foundation · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Ozarks Food Harvest Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Christine & Katharina Pauly Trust C funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.