Skip to content
Christine & Katharina Pauly Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

Christine & Katharina Pauly Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$152kFood & Nutrition$49kYouth Development$38kHealth$37kReligion$10kCrime & Legal$10kHousing & Shelter$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$816k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA OF THE OZARKS$12,500
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE OZARKS$10,000
BARRY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING$7,500
BETTY & BOBBY ALLISON OZARKS COUNSELING$7,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $139k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LEAST OF THESE INC: $15k → 8%HAVENHOUSE: $5k → 11%BRANSON SENIOR CENTER: $4k → 14%FOSTER ADOPT CONNECT INC: $10k → 15%LIVE 2 GIVE HOPE: $5k → 15%BARRY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $8k → 17%FOSTERING HOPE: $6k → 18%LEAST OF THESE INC: $10k → 8%BARRY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $8k → 17%FOSTERING HOPE: $5k → 18%LEAST OF THESE INC: $10k → 8%BRANSON SENIOR CENTER: $2k → 14%FOSTERING HOPE: $5k → 18%OACAC: $6k → 15%OACAC: $6k → 15%OACAC: $6k → 15%OZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION: $5k → 15%OACAC: $5k → 15%DOGWOOD RANCH CORP: $9k → 15%FAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$148k · 8 repeat orgs$160k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
17

Total granted

$148k
$138k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+20%

Still filing today

88%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LO
    LEAST OF THESE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $35k · revenue +243%
  • OA
    Ozarks Area Community Action Corporation
    5× · 2017–2021 · $28k · revenue +48%
  • FH
    FOSTERING HOPE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $16k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • CO
    COUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF THE OZARK
    one grant, 2020 · $18k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUB
    one grant, 2019 · $11k
  • CO
    COUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF THE OZARKS INC
    one grant, 2017 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Solace House of the Ozarks Inc

Provide a safe home of care and comfort for end-of-life patients.

Human Services
2
Ozark Regional Share and Care

Provide basic human services such as food, clothing, shelter, medical, etc. for local people in need

Human Services
3
Ozarks New Hope Inc

Provide integrated, patient-centered health services designed to meet the needs of all patients, regardless of ability to pay; help the healthcare industry better serve patients & community by promoting public health; supporting…

Health
4
Oasis of Northwest Arkansas Inc

Oasis of Northwest Arkansas provides sober housing and resources for women in recovery and their children.

Housing & Shelter
5
Ozark Food Pantry

Our Mission is to reach out to those in need in our area by providing healthy and nuritious food and other necessities to families and individuals who cannot afford them. In addition, the Pantry refers families to other agencies which can…

Food & Nutrition
6
Bicycle Coalition of the Ozarks
—
7
Mid-Ozark Casa Program

The program provides organization structure, leadership and training for community volunteers who serve as court appointed special advocates(casa) for agbused and neglected children in south central missouri.

Community Improvement
8
Carthage Crisis Center Inc

The carthage crisis center is committed to restoring homeless and needy people to self sufficiency with god's help.

Health
9
Community Blood Center of the Ozarks

Our mission is to provide a quality blood supply, in a timely manner, at the lowest reasonable fee, while remaining accountable to the local community, blood donors and health care providers.

Health
10
North Central Kansas Housing Opportunities Inc
Community Improvement
11
Arc of the Ozarks

To be a leader in service delivery for persons with disabilities by providing an array of supports and services to integrate them into their communities and to enhance the quality of their lives.

—
12
Freedom House Ministries

House of Hope Kansas City is unique, because we work with teens and their parents to find solutions and ultimately, restoration of healthy family relationships. We serve families in crisis with our program for residents to experience the…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Violence Center; the most unlike its peers is Hospice Foundation of the Ozarks Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEAST OF THESE INC: $35,000 · Human ServicesLEAST OF THESE INCOzarks Area Community Action Corporation: $28,000 · Human ServicesOzarks Area Community Action CorporationFOSTERING HOPE: $16,000 · Human ServicesFOSTERING HOPEBARRY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $15,000 · Human ServicesBARRY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGINGFAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER: $10,000 · Human ServicesFAMILY VIOLENCE CENTERFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INCDOGWOOD RANCH CORPORATION: $9,000 · Human ServicesDOGWOOD RANCH CORPORATIONBranson Senior Center: $6,000 · Human ServicesLive 2 Give Hope: $5,000 · Human ServicesHAVEN HOUSE INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF THE OZARK: $17,500 · OtherCOUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF THE OZARKALLISON OZARKS COUNSELING CENTER: $12,500 · OtherALLISON OZARKS COUNSELING CENTERBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA OF THE OZARKS: $12,500 · OtherBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA OF THE OZARKSBOYS & GIRLS CLUB: $10,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBCOUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF THE OZARKS INC: $10,000 · OtherCOUNCIL OF CHURCHES OF THE OZARKS INCCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE CASA: $10,000 · OtherCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE CASABIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE OZARKS: $10,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE OZARKSIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOUTHWEST MO OFFICE ON AGING: $9,978 · OtherSOUTHWEST MO OFFICE ON AGINGOZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION COR: $6,000 · OtherOZARKS AREA COMMUNITY ACTION CORBETTY AND BOBBY ALLISON OZARKS COUNSELING CENTER: $14,500 · HealthBETTY AND…PARKINSONS GROUP OF THE OZARKS: $5,000 · HealthPARKINSON…Hospice Foundation of the Ozarks Inc: $5,000 · HealthHospice F…CRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC: $21,000 · Crime & LegalOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $7,500 · Food & NutritionELEVATE BRANSON: $2,115 · Food & NutritionSAFE AND SOBER INC: $5,000 · Youth Development
Human Services$139,000Other$108,978Health$24,500Crime & Legal$21,000Food & Nutrition$9,615Youth Development$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEAST OF THESE INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOzarks Area Community Action Corporation: $28,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCRISIS NURSERY OF THE OZARKS INC: $21,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFOSTERING HOPE: $16,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetBARRY COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING: $15,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetBETTY AND BOBBY ALLISON OZARKS COUNSELING CENTER: $14,500 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetFAMILY VIOLENCE CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFOSTERADOPT CONNECT INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOGWOOD RANCH CORPORATION: $9,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetOZARKS FOOD HARVEST INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBranson Senior Center: $6,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetLive 2 Give Hope: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAFE AND SOBER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetHAVEN HOUSE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPARKINSONS GROUP OF THE OZARKS: $5,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetHospice Foundation of the Ozarks Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetELEVATE BRANSON: $2,115 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …The Charlie & Mary Be…Christine & Katharina…Rick and Marsha Floyd…The Hulston Family Fo…Commerce Bancshares F…Stanley & Elaine Ball…Arvest FoundationUnited Way of the Oza…Roy W Slusher Charita…Larry P O'Reilly and …Ozarks Food Harvest I…
Community Foundation of the Ozarks IncMO33.3× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of the Ozarks Inc · The Charlie & Mary Beth O'Reilly Family Foundation · Christine & Katharina Pauly Trust C · Rick and Marsha Floyd Foundation · The Hulston Family Foundation · Commerce Bancshares Foundation · Stanley & Elaine Ball Charitable Tr · Arvest Foundation · United Way of the Ozarks Inc · Roy W Slusher Charitable Foundation · Larry P O'Reilly and Family Foundation · Ozarks Food Harvest Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Christine & Katharina Pauly Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Christine & Katharina Pauly Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Christine & Katharina Pauly’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home