Skip to content

· Private foundation

Christian Mission Concerns of Tenne Piper Jr

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$60k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$385kHealth$87kPublic Benefit$66kEducation$59kHuman Services$53kInternational$36kRecreation & Sports$25kCommunity Improvement$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TURNING POINT USA$25,000
THE HOOVER INSTITUTION$25,000
ST JOHNS HEALTH FOUNDATION$5,000
ARA PARSEGHIAN MEDICAL RESEARCH$2,500
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOL$1,000
IMANI MIELE CHILDREN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–21, $53k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 24% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $10k → 8%FAMILIES MATTER: $13k → 12%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $10k → 8%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $10k → 8%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $5k → 8%FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
ID
MI
NY
OR
WY
CA
CO
VA
AZ
TN
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$550k · 13 repeat orgs$168k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +63% since the first grant, against +46% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
26

Total granted

$550k
$165k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+46%

Still filing today

62%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesReligionArts & CultureEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TURNING POINT USA INC
    4× · 2020–2024 · $63k · revenue +190%
  • FR
    FAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $40k · revenue +63%
  • NH
    Nathaniel's Hope Inc
    5× · 2017–2022 · $35k · revenue +209%

Funded once

  • CF
    CENTER FO CHRISTIAN EDUCATION
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • LC
    LIONHEART CHILDREN'S ACADEMYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $20k · revenue +257%
  • MS
    METROPOLITAN STATE UNIV OF DENVER
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
2
St Joseph's Hospital of Tampa Foundation Inc

St. joseph's hospitals foundation secures, manages and stewards philanthropic support to benefit the health care mission of st. joseph's hospital, st. joseph's women's hospital, st. joseph's children's hospital of tampa, st. joseph's…

Health
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
5
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
6
Indiana University Health Frankfort Inc

Lead the transformation of healthcare through quality, innovation & education, and make Indiana one of the nation's healthiest states.

Health
7
Cook Children's Medical Center

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease and injury.

Health
8
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
9
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
10
Cook Children's Health Plan

Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.

Health
11
All Children's Research Institute Inc

The corporation is organized and is operated exclusively for charitable, educational and scientific purposes. all children's research institute supports, encourages, and engages in and conducts medical research and other research in…

Health
12
Indiana University Health Foundation Inc

Indiana university health foundation leverages the power of philanthropy to support the iu health goal of making indiana one of the healthiest states in the nation.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is National Museum of Wildlife Art of the United States. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF JACKSON HOLE: $292,011 · OtherPRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF JACKSON HOLETURNING POINT USA INC: $63,000 · OtherTURNING POINT USA INCCENTER FO CHRISTIAN EDUCATION: $50,000 · OtherCENTER FO CHRISTIAN EDUCATIONDENISON MINISTRIES: $35,000 · OtherDENISON MINISTRIES+23 more: $79,761 · Other+23 moreSt John's Health Foundation: $31,000 · HealthSt John's …HENRY FORD HEALTH ST JOHN FOUNDATION: $26,500 · HealthHENRY FORD…TETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $9,000 · HealthTETON YOUT…+3 more: $4,000 · Health+3 moreFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $40,000 · Human ServicesFAMILIES MATTER INC: $12,500 · Human ServicesSpread the Love Commission: $3,875 · Human ServicesNathaniel's Hope Inc: $34,992 · ReligionLIONHEART CHILDREN'S ACADEMY: $20,000 · ReligionTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $25,000 · EducationALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $1,000 · EducationKids Hope USA: $1,000 · EducationAstoria Park Conservancy: $10,000 · EnvironmentNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR LABOR RELATIONS RESEARCH: $5,000 · Employment
Other$519,772Health$70,500Human Services$56,375Religion$54,992Education$27,000Environment$10,000Employment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $63,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY RESEARCH COUNCIL: $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNathaniel's Hope Inc: $34,992 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSt John's Health Foundation: $31,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHENRY FORD HEALTH ST JOHN FOUNDATION: $26,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIONHEART CHILDREN'S ACADEMY: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILIES MATTER INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSISTERS CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetAstoria Park Conservancy: $10,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetTETON YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES: $9,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR LABOR RELATIONS RESEARCH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSpread the Love Commission: $3,875 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN DIABETES EDUCATION SERVICES INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL MUSEUM OF WILDLIFE ART OF THE UNITED STATES: $1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetImani Milele Children Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBanner Health Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF JACKSON HOLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKids Hope USA: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD FOR THE POOR INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBONESHAKER PROJECT: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

CiosWY13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cios · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Jackson Hole · Servant Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Chicago Community Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Christian Mission Concerns of Tenne Piper Jr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Christian Mission Concerns of Tenne Piper Jr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Food for the Poor Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Christian Mission Concerns of Tenne Piper Jr?

Find your warmest path to Christian Mission Concerns of Tenne Piper Jr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Christian Mission Concerns of Tenne Piper Jr’s filings →

More from the funding graph