Skip to content

· Private foundation

Christian Financial Outreach and Impact Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$91k
Granted FY2024still arriving
41
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$57kHuman Services$28kHealth$28kFood & Nutrition$14kReligion$13kEducation$12kPhilanthropy$10kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 41 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k40 grants · $81k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$118k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MCREST(MACOMB COUNTY ROTATING EMERGENCY SHELTER TEAM)$10,000
BLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK- WARRENCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER ROCHESTER$8,000
SACRED HEART MAJOR SEMINARY$7,500
MACOMB COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$6,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY DETROIT$5,200
VISTA MARIA$5,000
FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN$3,500
WAVE$3,000
HAVEN HOMES$2,500
RAINBOW CONNECTION$2,500
HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE$2,500
PAUSE WITH A CAUSE$2,500
NEW HOPE CENTER FOR GRIEF SUPPORT$2,500
FLEECE & THANK YOU$2,400
ST FAUSTINA CONFERENCE ST VINCENT DE PAUL$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $35k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 39% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PAUSE WITH A CAUSE: $3k → 10%HAVEN HOMES DETROIT: $3k → 13%VETERAN EMPOWERMENT NEIGHBORHOODS: $2k → 14%DETROIT FRIENDSHIP HOUSE: $1k → 21%HOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $3k → 8%FAMILY TREE: $1k → 21%TURNING POINT: $1k → 10%SKIP SUPPORTING KIDS IN PAIN: $500 → 10%FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN: $4k → 8%KIDS ON THE GO: $10k → 10%DEO GRATIAS MINISTRIES DETROIT: $5k → 21%MOTOR CITY MITTEN MISSION: $1k → 10%ALL THINGS WOMEN INC: $1k → 21%MI COOKIE PROJECT: $1k → 21%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 11% of Christian Financial Outreach and Impact Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in MI; by stated purpose, 88%.

Christian Financial Outreach and Impact Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

19%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$33k · 5 repeat orgs$138k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
16

Total granted

$33k
$64k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+29%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEnvironmentPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HF
    HABITAT FOR HUMANITY DETROIT
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +45%
  • VISTA MARIA
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +14%
  • NH
    NEW HOPE CENTER FOR GRIEF SUPPORT INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $5k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • KO
    KIDS ON THE GO
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue -24%
  • MS
    MOTOWN SOUP INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $10k · revenue +31%
  • M
    MCREST
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Comfort Home Mi

Provide no cost care and no cost room and board for the terminally ill.

Human Services
2
Mittens for Detroit Inc

Collection of new unused mittens to be distributed to those in need in the detroit, michigan and other nearby underserved cities.

Human Services
3
Hospice Homes of Genesee and Lapeer Counties

To provide housing and end of life care and support to terminally ill individuals.

Human Services
4
Mymichigan Home Care

Creating healthy communities - together

—
5
Community & Home Supports Inc

Community & home supports, inc. was founded to help people and communities address poverty and homelessness. we strive to fulfill our purpose by developing, leading, and participating in collaborative and innovative efforts that support…

Human Services
6
Caring House Inc

To promote a violence free atmosphere from domestic and sexual violence in which survivors can recognize their options to have the opportunity to continue living violence free and regain their sense of self-worth; to educate and raise…

Human Services
7
Transplant House of West Michigan

The Transplant House of West Michigan is organized to provide individuals and their families that are going through the organ transplant process an affordable temporary home away from home in West Michigan to ease the transitions of their…

Housing & Shelter
8
The Serenity House of Flint

Advocate for people in recovery & provides holistic options for those recovering from substance use disorder, codependency & trauma.

Human Services
9
Fostering Solutions

The purpose of the organization is to provide child welfare and supporting services to children, families, and individuals working and living in michigan.

Human Services
10
Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan

Expressing God's love by reaching out to the hurting and homeless of the Great Lakes Bay Region by providing shelter and care, proclaiming the Gospel of Christ, and establishing Christian disciples among disadvantaged people.

Housing & Shelter
11
Midland's Open Door

Midland's Open Door (MOD) operates two crisis shelters, one for women and children and one for men. MOD's programs are designed to meet the immediate needs of homeless individuals by providing a safe and loving environment where each…

—
12
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities of Ann Arbor

To provide families of children experiencing a serious illness or injury requiring hospitalization or treatment, a "home away from home" that assists in alleviating families' emotional and financial stress.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Vista Maria; the most unlike its peers is Family Tree Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
15/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HABITAT FOR HUMANITY DETROIT: $10,400 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY DETROITMCREST(MACOMB COUNTY ROTATING EMERGENCY SHELTER TEAM): $10,000 · OtherMCREST(MACOMB COUNTY ROTATING EMERGENCY SHELTER TEAM)MCREST: $10,000 · OtherMCRESTVISTA MARIA: $10,000 · OtherVISTA MARIAST VINCENT DE PAUL DETROIT: $10,000 · OtherST VINCENT DE PAUL DETROITBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK- WARRENCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER ROCHESTER: $8,000 · OtherBLESSINGS IN A BACKPACK- WARRENCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER ROCHESTE…SACRED HEART MAJOR SEMINARY: $7,500 · OtherSACRED HEART MAJOR SEMINARYMACOMB COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $6,000 · OtherMACOMB COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+24 more: $30,701 · Other+24 moreKIDS ON THE GO: $10,000 · Human ServicesKIDS ON THE GODEO GRATIAS MINISTRIES DETROIT: $5,000 · Human ServicesDEO GRATIAS MINISTRIES…FAITH WORKS MICHIGAN: $3,500 · Human ServicesFAITH WORKS MICHIGANHAVEN HOMES OF DETROIT: $2,500 · Human ServicesHAVEN HOMES OF DETROITHOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $2,500 · Human ServicesHOUSE OF PROVIDENCEPaws With A Cause: $2,500 · Human ServicesPaws With A CauseVETERAN EMPOWERMENT NEIGHBORHOODS: $2,000 · Human ServicesVETERAN EMPOWERMENT NE…+7 more: $6,500 · Human Services+7 moreNEW HOPE CENTER FOR GRIEF SUPPORT INC: $5,000 · HealthJENNA KAST BELIEVE IN MIRACLES FOUNDATION: $3,300 · HealthTHE RAINBOW CONNECTION: $2,500 · HealthTHE NEW DAY FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES: $1,500 · HealthALS OF MICHIGAN INC: $500 · HealthBrilora Fertility Foundation: $500 · HealthMOTOWN SOUP INC: $10,000 · PhilanthropyCLINTON RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL: $2,500 · EnvironmentFLEECE & THANK YOU: $2,400 · Youth DevelopmentABIGAYLE MINISTRIES: $1,000 · Religion
Other$107,601Human Services$34,500Health$13,300Philanthropy$10,000Environment$2,500Youth Development$2,400Religion$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY DETROIT: $10,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetKIDS ON THE GO: $10,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMOTOWN SOUP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetVISTA MARIA: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMACOMB COUNTY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDEO GRATIAS MINISTRIES DETROIT: $5,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetNEW HOPE CENTER FOR GRIEF SUPPORT INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetFAITH WORKS MICHIGAN: $3,500 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetJENNA KAST BELIEVE IN MIRACLES FOUNDATION: $3,300 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE RAINBOW CONNECTION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHAVEN HOMES OF DETROIT: $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetHOUSE OF PROVIDENCE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLINTON RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPaws With A Cause: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFLEECE & THANK YOU: $2,400 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVETERAN EMPOWERMENT NEIGHBORHOODS: $2,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetTHE NEW DAY FOUNDATION FOR FAMILIES: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDETROIT FRIENDSHIP HOUSE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE COOKIE PROJECT dba MI Cookie Project: $1,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetMOTOR CITY MITTEN MISSION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILY TREE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetABIGAYLE MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTURNING POINT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALS OF MICHIGAN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBrilora Fertility Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSKIP - SUPPORTING KIDS IN PAIN: $500 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southeast MichiganMI24.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Canton Community Foundation Inc · The Barton Malow Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · Aa Van Elslander Foundation · Eagles for Children · United Way for Southeastern Michigan · Christian Financial Credit Union · Phillip and Elizabeth Filmer Memorial · Children's Hospital of Michigan Foundation · Others First Inc · Harry a and Margaret D Towsley Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Christian Financial Outreach and Impact Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Christian Financial Outreach and Impact Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Christian Financial Outreach and Impact Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to Christian Financial Outreach and Impact Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Christian Financial Outreach and Impact’s filings →

    More from the funding graph