Skip to content
Christian Fellowship Community at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

Christian Fellowship Community

The organization hosted conferences in different cities during the fiscal year, that featured a time of fellowship and inspiration as delivered by a well-known speaker.

$37k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$30kInternational$29kPublic Safety & Disaster$20kHealth$20kReligion$10kEducation$5k
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 2 grants below total $20,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $36,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $16,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$996k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL$10,000
SEE FORWARD MINISTRIES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 79% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YMCA YORK: $10k → 9%THE SALVATION ARMY: $10k → 14%TEAMCONNOR CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%SECOND BAPTIST CHURCH: $10k → 16%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA FOUNDATIONIN: $5k → 13%ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 21%THE SALAVATION ARMY WISCONSIN AND UPPER MICHIGAN DIVISION: $10k → 17%LOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL: $10k → 4%LEADING THE WAY: $10k → 14%SEE FORWARD MINISTRIES: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
NY
PA
MO
KY
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
LOVE4KIDS Foundation
—
2
Yahve-Jire Children's Foundation-Us

Yjcf currently operates an orphanage and school in haiti serving some of the poorest and most at-risk children in the world. our mission is to provide hope to the children of haiti by providing safe housing, education and the knowledge of…

International
3
World Forgotten Children Foundation
Philanthropy
4
Love Foundation
Philanthropy
5
Sanyuka Childrens Ministries

Sanyuka's mission is to create an environment where orphaned and vulnerable children in Uganda can experience the exceeding love of Jesus Christ, the joy and support of a family, with respect, safety, hope and an opportunity to realize…

International
6
WISH4LIFE Inc

To provide the opportunity for compassionate and quality cancer care to children in developing nations.

International
7
Lucile Packard Foundation for Children's Health

The lucile packard foundation for children's health is here to unlock philanthropy to transform health for all kids and moms, in northern california and around the world. our foundation raises funds for child and maternal health at lucile…

Health
8
Hope for Haiti's Children Ministries Incorporated

To demonstrate christian compassion to poverty-bound haitian children and their families, providing opportunities for these children to become leaders in their homes, churches and communities.

Health
9
Haven of Hope International Inc

Haven of hope international (hohi) is at the forefront of orphan care innovation with its mission to raise the standard of care for orphans left behind and abandoned by traditional adoption systems. its mission is simple and specific:…

International
10
Kids for Him

assisting orphans and missionary in need

International
11
Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation

Partners In Health (PIH) is a non-profit, global health organization that fights social injustice by bringing the benefits of modern medical science first and foremost to the most vulnerable communities worldwide. In Haiti, Malawi, Rwanda,…

Health
12
Gift of Life International Inc

To further the cause of world peace and understanding by facilitating free medical services, primarily to children suffering from heart defects and other similar or allied illnesses regardless of race, gender, creed, or national origin,…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Louis Children's Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The Young Women's Christian Association of York Pa. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 12 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
3/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF YORK PA: $10,000 · OtherTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF YORK PASALVATION ARMY MILWAUKEE COUNTY: $10,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY MILWAUKEE COUNTYSECOND BAPTIST CHURCH: $10,000 · OtherSECOND BAPTIST CHURCHTEAMCONNOR CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 · OtherTEAMCONNOR CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATIONLEADING THE WAY: $10,000 · OtherLEADING THE WAYTHE SALVATION ARMY: $10,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYPennies for Haiti: $14,000 · InternationalPennies for HaitiADVOCATES OF LOVE INC: $5,000 · InternationalADVOCATES OF LOVE …LOVE ONE INTERNATIONAL: $10,000 · EducationLOVE ONE INTER…University of South Florida Foundation Inc: $5,000 · EducationUniversity of …SEE FORWARD MINISTRIES: $10,000 · ReligionSEE FORWA…ST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 · HealthST LOUIS …
Other$60,000International$19,000Education$15,000Religion$10,000Health$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSEE FORWARD MINISTRIES: $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetST LOUIS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTEAMCONNOR CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetUniversity of South Florida Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCATES OF LOVE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charit…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA8.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Christian Fellowship Community funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Christian Fellowship Community. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 12 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Christian Fellowship’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home