Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chou Family Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$74k
Granted FY2023
6
Grants FY2023
5
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Religion$281kHuman Services$80kEducation$60kHousing & Shelter$15kCivil Rights$10kCommunity Improvement$10kYouth Development$9kRecreation & Sports$8kOther$0
02FY2023 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $69k
$14,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE OCTET COLLABORATIVE INC$20,000
CHINA PARTNERSHIP$15,000
BARNABAS AND CO$14,000
VETSTARTS INC$10,000
THE VERITAS FORUM INC$10,000
ABIDE GATHERING INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%VETSTART: $25k → 11%VETSTARTS INC: $15k → 11%FREEDOM UNITED: $10k → 8%VETSTART: $15k → 11%VETSTARTS INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
CO
NC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$334k · 6 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +0% since the first grant, against -8% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2023, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
17

Total granted

$334k
$135k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+0%
-8%

Still filing today

67%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
ReligionEducationHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • V
    VERITAS
    5× · 2017–2021 · $125k
  • VI
    VETSTARTS INC
    5× · 2018–2023 · $79k · revenue -39%
  • CP
    CHINA PARTNERSHIP
    3× · 2021–2023 · $45k

Funded once

  • HI
    HALFTIME INSTITUTE
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -14%
  • CT
    CALLED TO BE PROJECT
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • CH
    CONNECTIONS HOMES INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +276%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Awakening Ministries International

Proclaim the gospel worldwide, prepare followers of jesus christ, and propel those into their god given destiny.

Religion
3
Alliance for Transformational Ministry

Enable christian organizations worldwide to initiate and strenghten ministries that lead people to become followers of jesus and transform communities out of cycles of poverty and disease.

Religion
4
Alongside Inc

Restore hope, purpose, passion and relationships among Christian leaders who are making an impact around the world.

Religion
5
The Barnabas Group

The barnabas group inc is a collaboration of christian leaders, putting marketplace and kingdom resources to use to transform lives for god.

Human Services
6
Explore God (Formerly Known As We Inc)

Explore god creates and leverages quality content and media that enables young adults, seekers, and christians to explore god, experience god, and engage in god's plan for their life. using cutting-edge technology, we facilitate spiritual…

—
7
Adventive Cross Cultural Initiatives

ACCI serves pioneering Christians, empowering them to proclaim the gospel, fulfill their God-given visions, and advance the kingdom of God. ACCI longs for a world where lives are transformed through the Holy Spirit, where new disciples are…

Religion
8
International Commission Inc

Equipping and enabling believers worldwide to conduct church-based evangelism projects to reach unbelievers and make disciples.

Religion
9
Institute of Chinese Studies

ChinsSource is a trusted partner and platform for educating the global church on critical issues facing the church and ministries in China and for connecting Christians inside and outside China to advance the kingdom of God globally

International
10
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
11
The Barnabas Group-Silicon Valley

The barnabas group inc is a collaboration of christian leaders using marketplace and kingdom resources to transform lives for god.

Religion
12
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Halftime Institute; the most unlike its peers is Vetstarts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VERITAS: $125,000 · OtherVERITASCHINA PARTNERSHIP: $45,000 · OtherCHINA PARTNERSHIPHALFTIME INSTITUTE: $20,000 · OtherHALFTIME INSTITUTECALLED TO BE PROJECT: $15,000 · OtherCALLED TO BE PROJECTCONNECTIONS HOMES INC: $15,000 · OtherCONNECTIONS HOMES INCIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherASIAN ACCESS: $10,000 · OtherFELLOWSHIP RALEIGH: $10,000 · Other+6 more: $24,000 · Other+6 moreTHE OCTET COLLABORATIVE INC: $40,000 · ReligionTHE OCTET COLLABORATIVE…THE VERITAS FORUM INC: $35,000 · ReligionTHE VERITAS FORUM INCBARNABAS & CO: $14,000 · ReligionBARNABAS & COABIDE GATHERING INC: $10,000 · ReligionABIDE GATHERING INCVETSTARTS INC: $78,650 · Human ServicesVETSTARTS INCFreedom United: $10,000 · Human ServicesFreedom UnitedCHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $10,000 · EducationJA WORLDWIDE INC: $5,000 · EducationGO AND LOVE FOUNDATION: $5,000 · EducationGATEWAY WOMEN'S CARE: $1,000 · Civil Rights
Other$274,000Religion$99,000Human Services$88,650Education$20,000Civil Rights$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVETSTARTS INC: $78,650 over 5y, 22% of budgetTHE OCTET COLLABORATIVE INC: $40,000 over 2y, 21% of budgetTHE VERITAS FORUM INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHALFTIME INSTITUTE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetCONNECTIONS HOMES INC: $15,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetBARNABAS & CO: $14,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetABIDE GATHERING INC: $10,000 over 2y, 6.4% of budgetCHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJA WORLDWIDE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGO AND LOVE FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetGATEWAY WOMEN'S CARE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VETSTARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE OCTET COLLABORATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE VERITAS FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds HALFTIME INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS HOMES INC ↗
  • Who funds BARNABAS & CO ↗
  • Who funds Freedom United ↗
  • Who funds ABIDE GATHERING INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds JA WORLDWIDE INC ↗
  • Who funds GO AND LOVE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GATEWAY WOMEN'S CARE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA11.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chou Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chou Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chou Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Chou Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chou Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph