Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chott Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$116k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$26k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$185kReligion$98kHuman Services$44kCrime & Legal$13kFood & Nutrition$12kPublic Safety & Disaster$12kPhilanthropy$10kRecreation & Sports$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $76k
$5,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$305k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JOHN OF THE CROSS$25,500
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OUTREACH$10,200
FENWICK HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
NAZARETH ACADEMY$10,000
TRINITY HIGH SCHOOL$10,000
CATHOLIC EXTENSION$10,000
ST JOHN OF THE CROSS TEACHER RECOGNITION TRUST$6,000
CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES$5,900
MERCY HOME FOR BOYS & GIRLS$5,800
MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION$5,600
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$5,200
LA GRANGE COUNTRY CLUB FOUNDATION$5,000
ST CLETUS CHURCH$2,300
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME$1,700
ST JUDES CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPITAL$1,300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $6k → 14%MISERACORDIA HOME: $3k → 14%MISERACORDIA HOME: $2k → 14%MISERACORDIA HOME: $2k → 14%MISERACORDIA HOME: $1k → 14%MISERACORDIA HOME: $1k → 14%MISERACORDIA HOME: $850 → 14%MISERACORDIA HOME: $700 → 14%MISERACORDIA HOME: $500 → 14%SISTER HOUSE: $5k → 14%SISTER HOUSE: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
IN
CA
MO
VA
MD
NM
TN
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$369k · 43 repeat orgs$23k to everyone else

43 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 23 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

43
17

Total granted

$369k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+48%

Still filing today

30%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesEmploymentCrime & LegalMembership BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MH
    MISERICORDIA HOME
    8× · 2017–2024 · $10k · revenue +76%
  • S
    SISTERHOUSE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $7k · revenue +39%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $4k · revenue +145%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • SJ
    ST JOHN OF THE CROSS PARISH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • UO
    UNIV OF NOTRE DAME CLUB OF CHICAGOgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +48%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
2
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
3
National Opinion Research Center

See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…

Social Science
4
Osf Healthcare Foundation

OSF Healthcare Foundation's mission is to develop and implement fund raising strategies to generate contributions from the public in support of the various activities and projects of OSF Healthcare System.

Health
5
Good Samaritan Hospital Foundation

We, at ch, humbly join together to bring christ's healing mission and the mission of mercy of the catholic church expressed in catholic health care to our communities.

—
6
Loyola University of Chicago

We are chicago's jesuit, catholic university - a diverse community seeking god in all things and working to expand knowledge in the service of humanity through learning, justice, and faith.

Education
7
Holy Cross Hospital

The hospital is a catholic health care organization sponsored by the sisters of st. casimir. by our commitment to witness to the healing mission of jesus, we contribute to healthy communities and promote quality health care to all with…

Health
8
Indiana University Health Care Associates Inc

To deliver preeminent medical care and service to our patients and communities through outstanding and innovative medical leadership and practice, while participating in and supporting excellence in education and research. We achieve this…

Health
9
Loyola University

Loyola University New Orleans, a Jesuit and Catholic institution of higher education, welcomes students of diverse backgrounds and prepares them to lead meaningful lives with and for others; to pursue truth, wisdom, and virtue; and to work…

Education
10
Asco Association

Asco association promotes the common business interests of its members by: (1) advocating for policies that improve the quality of cancer care; (2) maintaining the highest standards of oncology medical care through programs supporting…

Community Improvement
11
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
12
Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago

Achieving international impact through world-class research and education in fundamental computer science and information technology.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Illinois Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Institute for Cancer Research. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/22
Grantees still filing
14/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NAZARETH ACADEMY: $113,500 · OtherNAZARETH ACADEMYST JOHN OF THE CROSS: $68,165 · OtherST JOHN OF THE CROSSFENWICK HIGH SCHOOL: $27,500 · OtherFENWICK HIGH SCHOOLST CLETUS CHURCH: $20,000 · OtherST CLETUS CHURCHTRINITY HIGH SCHOOL: $15,495 · OtherCATHOLIC CHURCH EXTENSION SOCIETY OF US OF AMER: $12,100 · OtherCATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES: $11,570 · Other+41 more: $63,990 · Other+41 moreMISERICORDIA HOME: $10,150 · Human ServicesSISTERHOUSE: $7,100 · Human ServicesMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $5,600 · Human ServicesLa Grange Country Club Foundation: $10,000 · PhilanthropySAINT JOHN OF THE CROSS TEACHER RECOGNITION TRUST: $6,000 · PhilanthropyPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,300 · Philanthropy+1 more: $400 · PhilanthropyDomestic Violence Outreach: $13,490 · Crime & LegalUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $9,400 · Education+1 more: $200 · EducationST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,600 · HealthAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $700 · HealthMAYO CLINIC: $450 · HealthHINSDALE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $250 · Health+1 more: $100 · HealthThe Cara Program: $1,000 · Employment
Other$332,320Human Services$22,850Philanthropy$17,700Crime & Legal$13,490Education$9,600Health$5,100Employment$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDomestic Violence Outreach: $13,490 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetMISERICORDIA HOME: $10,150 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLa Grange Country Club Foundation: $10,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetUniversity of Notre Dame du Lac: $9,400 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSISTERHOUSE: $7,100 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetSAINT JOHN OF THE CROSS TEACHER RECOGNITION TRUST: $6,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMISERICORDIA FOUNDATION: $5,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $3,600 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUNIV OF NOTRE DAME CLUB OF CHICAGO: $1,500 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $1,300 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cara Program: $1,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS: $800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH: $700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMcDermott Center: $550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF ILLINOIS INC: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARINE TOYS FOR TOTS FOUNDATION: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHINSDALE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAssociated Alumnae and Alumni of the Sacred Heart: $200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTUSKEGEE AIRMEN INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Domestic Violence Outreach ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA HOME ↗
  • Who funds La Grange Country Club Foundation ↗
  • Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
  • Who funds SISTERHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SAINT JOHN OF THE CROSS TEACHER RECOGNITION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds MISERICORDIA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds UNIV OF NOTRE DAME CLUB OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Cara Program ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds McDermott Center ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL14.4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Irish Fellowship Educational & Cultural Foundation · WP & HB White Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chott Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chott Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 64 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chott Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph