Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chime Scholars Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
267
Grants FY2025still arriving
40
States reached
$118k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Education$3.3MEmployment$249kArts & Culture$69kCommunity Improvement$20kReligion$5k
02FY2025 · 267 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k253 grants · $1.1M
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $168k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $666k
$5,000
Median grant
40
States reached
$812k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND INC$118,000
THE BOTTOM LINE INC$110,000
OAKLAND PROMISE$100,000
BAY AREA HYBRID COLLEGE INITIATIVE$87,650
SCHOLARSHOT$69,000
KIPP METRO ATLANTA COLLABORATIVE INC$63,500
THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND$62,500
THE NEW YORK OPPORTUNITY NETWORK INC$55,000
UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS$45,000
HISPANIC ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES$37,225
UASPIRE INC$33,000
OAKLAND-ALAMEDA COUNTY COLISEUM FOUNDATION$19,825
MAKING WAVES FOUNDATION INC$18,125
THE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION$15,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 76% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE BOTTOM LINE INC: $110k → 16%BAY AREA HYBRID COLLEGE INITIATIVE: $88k → 9%OAKLAND PROMISE: $100k → 10%THE NEW YORK OPPORTUNITY NETWORK INC: $55k → 17%SCHOLARSHOT: $100k → 14%HISPANIC ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES: $130k → 16%THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND INC: $118k → 14%KIPP METRO ATLANTA COLLABORATIVE INC: $85k → 13%COLUMBUS STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT FDN: $23k → 15%THE BOTTOM LINE INC: $15k → 16%BAY AREA HYBRID COLLEGE INITIATIVE: $40k → 9%UASPIRE INC: $55k → 10%THE NEW YORK OPPORTUNITY NETWORK INC: $55k → 17%SCHOLARSHOT: $80k → 14%HISPANIC ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES: $37k → 16%THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND INC: $118k → 14%KIPP METRO ATLANTA COLLABORATIVE INC: $64k → 13%COLUMBUS STATE COMMUNITY COLLEGE DEVELOPMENT FOUND: $8k → 15%OAKLAND-ALAMEDA COUNTY COLISEUM FOUNDATION: $20k → 9%UASPIRE INC: $33k → 10%SCHOLARSHOT: $69k → 14%THURGOOD MARSHALL COLLEGE FUND INC: $118k → 14%ACHIEVE ATLANTA INC: $68k → 13%MAKING WAVES FOUNDATION INC: $18k → 9%BEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC: $33k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS: $60k → 14%THE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $29k → 14%ACHIEVE ATLANTA INC: $26k → 13%OAKLAND PROMISE: $100k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS: $50k → 14%THE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%URBAN STRATEGIES COUNCIL: $20k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS: $50k → 14%THE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION: $15k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS: $45k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS: $40k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
ND
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 59 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against -18% for those funded once.

59 repeat relationships: 58 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 207 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
33

Total granted

$2.3M
$278k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
-18%

Still filing today

19%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 47% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    Thurgood Marshall College Fund
    3× · 2022–2025 · $354k · revenue +28%
  • OP
    OAKLAND PROMISE
    2× · 2023–2025 · $200k · revenue +32%
  • KM
    Kipp Metro Atlanta Collaborative Inc
    2× · 2024–2025 · $149k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • AA
    ACHIEVE ATLANTA INC
    one grant, 2023 · $95k · revenue +7%
  • B1
    BEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC
    one grant, 2024 · $33k · revenue -18%
  • US
    URBAN STRATEGIES COUNCIL
    one grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue -24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Equal Opportunity Schools

Equal opportunity schools' mission is to strengthen educator and system leader capacity to break down barriers to increase access, belonging, and success in rigorous college and career-prep secondary school courses for students of color…

Education
2
Inroads Inc

To deliver innovative leadership development programs and creative solutions that identify, accelerate, and elevate underrepresented talent throughout their careers.

Education
3
National College Advising Corps Inc

College advising corps (cac) is the nation's largest nonprofit service organization dedicated to advancing educational equity and expanding opportunity for all high school students. cac provides college enrollment and career guidance to…

Education
4
Onegoal

Onegoal (the organization") is a nonprofit organization incorporated on june 13, 2003 to provide underserved students with the resources, support, and network to earn a postsecondary degree.

Youth Development
5
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
6
The Urban Assembly Inc

To advance students' economic and social mobility by improving public education.

International
7
College Summit Inc

College summit, inc. d/b/a peerforward (peerforward)'s mission is to unleash the power of positive peer influence to transform the lives of youth living in low-income communities by connecting them to college and careers. in low-income…

Education
8
10000 Degrees

10,000 degrees is a leading college success nonprofit in the san francisco bay area. we help students from low-income backgrounds gain access to and complete higher education to positively impact their communities and the world.…

Education
9
AI4ALL

Ai4all's mission is to ensure that the next generation of ai leaders reflects humanity. ai4all is transforming the pipeline of ai practitioners who will shape ai for the benefit of humanity.

Youth Development
10
Urban Assembly Charter School for Computer Science

Our mission is to ensure every student graduates with college acceptance letters, high tech skills, real work experience, and a plan to turn those opportunities into a successful career.

Education
11
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
12
Austin Partners in Education

Apie provides college and career readiness support through individualized academic and mentoring programs to prepare students for success.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Achieve Atlanta Inc; the most unlike its peers is Making Waves Foundation Inc Aka Making Waves Education Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 299 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/18
Grantees still filing
8/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SCHOLARSHOT: $249,000 · OtherSCHOLARSHOTUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS: $245,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT DALLAS+183 more: $1,087,000 · Other+183 moreThurgood Marshall College Fund: $354,000 · EducationThurgood Marshall College FundOAKLAND PROMISE: $200,000 · EducationOAKLAND PROMISEHISPANIC ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES: $167,225 · EducationHISPANIC ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIESKipp Metro Atlanta Collaborative Inc: $148,500 · EducationKipp Metro Atlanta Collaborative IncBay Area Hybrid College Initiative DBA Rivet School: $127,650 · EducationBay Area Hybrid College Initiative DBA Rivet Scho…THE NEW YORK OPPORTUNITY NETWORK INC DBA THE OPPORTUNITY NETWORK: $110,000 · EducationTHE NEW YORK OPPORTUNITY NETWORK INC DBA THE OPPO…ACHIEVE ATLANTA INC: $94,500 · EducationACHIEVE ATLANTA INCUASPIRE INC: $88,000 · EducationUASPIRE INCTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $62,500 · Education+3 more: $70,450 · EducationTHE BOTTOM LINE INC: $125,000 · Community ImprovementTHE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $68,500 · Arts & CultureColumbus State Community College Development Foundation Inc: $30,000 · Philanthropy
Other$1,581,000Education$1,422,825Community Improvement$125,000Arts & Culture$68,500Philanthropy$30,000

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThurgood Marshall College Fund: $354,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSCHOLARSHOT: $249,000 over 3y, 6.8% of budgetOAKLAND PROMISE: $200,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetHISPANIC ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES: $167,225 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetKipp Metro Atlanta Collaborative Inc: $148,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBay Area Hybrid College Initiative DBA Rivet School: $127,650 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE BOTTOM LINE INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE NEW YORK OPPORTUNITY NETWORK INC DBA THE OPPORTUNITY NETWORK: $110,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetACHIEVE ATLANTA INC: $94,500 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUASPIRE INC: $88,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $68,500 over 3y, 2.5% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND: $62,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC: $32,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetColumbus State Community College Development Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetURBAN STRATEGIES COUNCIL: $20,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMAKING WAVES FOUNDATION INC AKA MAKING WAVES EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $18,125 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Thurgood Marshall College Fund ↗
  • Who funds SCHOLARSHOT ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND PROMISE ↗
  • Who funds HISPANIC ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES & UNIVERSITIES ↗
  • Who funds Kipp Metro Atlanta Collaborative Inc ↗
  • Who funds Bay Area Hybrid College Initiative DBA Rivet School ↗
  • Who funds THE BOTTOM LINE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NEW YORK OPPORTUNITY NETWORK INC DBA THE OPPORTUNITY NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds ACHIEVE ATLANTA INC ↗
  • Who funds UASPIRE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND 12 EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Columbus State Community College Development Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds URBAN STRATEGIES COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND-ALAMEDA COUNTY COLISEUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MAKING WAVES FOUNDATION INC AKA MAKING WAVES EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA12.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chime Scholars Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chime Scholars Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Uaspire Inc: 1% of income from government
  • The Bottom Line Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Chime Scholars Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Chime Scholars Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 299 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chime Scholars’ filings →

More from the funding graph