Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chicago Freedom Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$20k
Granted FY2024still arriving
9
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$44kHuman Services$31kArts & Culture$16kCrime & Legal$16kFood & Nutrition$16kInternational$16kHealth$9kHousing & Shelter$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$20k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES$4,000
WORLD ORPHAN FUND$2,000
WENATCHEE VALLEY MUSEUM$2,000
MEALS ON WHEELS OF CONTRA COSTA$2,000
CENTER FOR URBAN TEACHING$2,000
INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE$2,000
CHRISTIAN HOME EDUCATORS OF MIDLAND$2,000
CHRISTIAN HOME EDUCATORS OF MIDLAND$2,000
CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $22k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 27% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GROWTH SKILLS FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%WORLD ORPHAN FUND: $2k → 8%GROWTH SKILLS FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%WORLD ORPHAN FUND: $2k → 8%GROWTH SKILLS FOUNDATION: $2k → 10%WORLD ORPHAN FUND: $2k → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND: $2k → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND: $2k → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND: $2k → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND: $2k → 8%WORLD ORPHAN FUND: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
MA
CA
VA
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 10% of Chicago Freedom Trust’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 10% of the giving stays in IL; by stated purpose, 20%.

Chicago Freedom Trustlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$160k · 14 repeat orgs$4k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
2

Total granted

$160k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+64%
+371%

Still filing today

64%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationInternationalFood & NutritionCivil RightsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MS
    MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $25k · revenue +91%
  • The World Orphan Fund Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +766%
  • MO
    MEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $16k · revenue +84%

Funded once

  • SA
    STEPPING AHEAD LTD
    one grant, 2017 · $2k
  • LC
    LIFECLINIC COMMUNITY RESOURCESgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +371%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Food & Water Watch

Food & water watch conducts extensive research and public education to ensure the food and water we consume is safe, accessible and sustainably produced. so we can all enjoy and trust in what we eat and drink, we help people take charge of…

Food & Nutrition
2
Community Kitchen

Food service for the poor, economically disadvantaged, and elderly.

Food & Nutrition
3
Council for Court Excellence

Council for court excellence's (cce's) mission is to bring people together to conduct research, educate, and advocate to make d.c.'s unique legal systems more just, equitable, and accountable to the community.

—
4
Midwives College of Utah

Educate and train midwives to provide safe, professional, affordable and personal maternity and general health care.

Education
5
World Molecular Imaging Society

The world molecular imaging society (wmis) is an international scientific educational organization dedicated to the understanding of biology and medicine through multimodal in vivo imaging of cellular and molecular events involved in…

Health
6
Connections for Life

Empowering people with disabilities by providing services that promote independence, equality and intergration, enhancing their quality of life.

Health
7
Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition
8
Minnesota Land Trust

The minnesota land trust protects and restores minnesota's most vital natural lands in order to provide wildlife habitat, clean water, outdoor experiences and scenic beauty for generations to come.

Environment
9
Qm Quality Matters Inc

To promote and improve the quality of online education and student learning through: 1. development of research-supported, best (continued on schedule o) practice-based quality standards and appropriate evaluation tools and procedures. 2.…

Education
10
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
11
Christian Care Retirement Apartments Inc

Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve

—
12
Minnesota Council of Nonprofits Inc

The Minnesota Council of Nonprofits informs, promotes, connects and strengthens individual nonprofits and the nonprofit sector.

Philanthropy
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Growthskills Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels Contra Costa Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRISTIAN HOME EDUCATORS OF MIDLAND: $16,000 · OtherCHRISTIAN HOME EDUCATORS OF MIDLANDWENATCHEE VALLEY MUSEUM: $12,000 · OtherWENATCHEE VALLEY MUSEUMMEDSTAR NATL REHABILITATION NETWORK: $11,000 · OtherMEDSTAR NATL REHABILITATION NETWORKCHEMINISTRY - DEBATE CLUB: $4,000 · OtherCHEMINISTRY - DEBATE CLUBCHEMINISTRY - ROBOTICS: $4,000 · OtherCHEMINISTRY - ROBOTICSSTEPPING AHEAD LTD: $2,000 · OtherWENATCHEE VALLEY MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTER: $4,000 · OtherWENATCHEE VALLEY MUSEUM & CULTURAL CEN…LIFECLINIC COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $2,000 · OtherMUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC: $25,000 · InternationalMUSTARD SEED COMM…CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $16,000 · EducationCHICAGO HOPE ACA…CENTER FOR URBAN TEACHING INC: $8,000 · EducationCENTER FOR URBAN…The World Orphan Fund Inc: $16,000 · Human ServicesThe World Orpha…GROWTHSKILLS FOUNDATION: $6,000 · Human ServicesGROWTHSKILLS FO…MEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC: $16,000 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WH…INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $16,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE F…Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan: $6,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$55,000International$25,000Education$24,000Human Services$22,000Food & Nutrition$16,000Civil Rights$16,000Housing & Shelter$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC: $25,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetThe World Orphan Fund Inc: $16,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC: $16,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR URBAN TEACHING INC: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGROWTHSKILLS FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWENATCHEE VALLEY MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTER: $4,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLIFECLINIC COMMUNITY RESOURCES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MUSTARD SEED COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds The World Orphan Fund Inc ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS CONTRA COSTA INC ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HOPE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR URBAN TEACHING INC ↗
  • Who funds Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan ↗
  • Who funds GROWTHSKILLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WENATCHEE VALLEY MUSEUM & CULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds LIFECLINIC COMMUNITY RESOURCES ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA10.1× affinity6 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chicago Freedom Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chicago Freedom Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chicago Freedom Trust?

    Find your warmest path to Chicago Freedom Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chicago Freedom’s filings →

    More from the funding graph