Skip to content
Chi Omega Fraternity XI Kappa at a glance

· Public charity

Chi Omega Fraternity XI Kappa

The mission of chi omega fraternity, xi kappa chapter, is to provide an environment that promotes community service, high scholarship and leadership opportunities for its members.

$360k
Granted FY2025still arriving
17
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$90k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Human Services$454kEducation$185kHealth$154kYouth Development$51kReligion$44kRecreation & Sports$23kInternational$11kMembership Benefit$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 17 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 17 grants below total $311,768, the rows itemized in this filing. The $360,313 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $48,545 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $85k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $86k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $141k
$7,689
Median grant
9
States reached
$174k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS TAMU$90,000
STILL CREEK BOYS RANCH INC$51,283
CHI OMEGA$37,772
MAKE-A-WISH$30,000
DELTA GAMMA$17,847
ZETA TAU ALPHA FOUNDATION$9,787
CAMP KESEM$9,787
BRAZOS PRENATAL FOUNDATION$7,689
THE BRIDGE MINISTRIES$7,689
THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$6,959
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BRAZOS$6,811
STARKEY HEARING FOUNDATION$6,641
SEXUAL ASSAULT RESOUCE CENTER$6,638
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$6,615
SOS MINISTRIES$6,172
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $276k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%CAMP KESEM: $14k → 14%STILL CREEK BOYS RANCH INC: $70k → 22%CAMP KESEM: $10k → 14%STILL CREEK BOYS RANCH INC: $66k → 22%STILL CREEK BOYS RANCH INC: $65k → 22%STILL CREEK BOYS RANCH INC: $51k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
IN
OH
CA
CO
TN
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

69%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$736k · 13 repeat orgs$332k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +6% since the first grant, against -24% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$736k
$193k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
-24%

Still filing today

92%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’22’23’24’25
HealthReligionEducationHuman ServicesInternationalHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    Still Creek Boys Ranch Inc
    7× · 2018–2025 · $418k · revenue +48%
  • CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2024–2025 · $61k · revenue +8%
  • CK
    Camp Kesem National
    2× · 2024–2025 · $24k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • V
    VARIOUS
    one grant, 2019 · $69k
  • VU
    VARIOUS UNDER 500000
    one grant, 2020 · $67k
  • DG
    DELTA GAMMA FRATERNITY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Baptist Children's Home Inc

Texas baptist children's home embraces children and families in need in order to empower and equip them for a promising future.

Human Services
2
Texas Girls and Boys Ranch

Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.

Human Services
3
Children At Heart Ministries Inc

Children at heart ministries is a family of christian ministries that exists to honor god and build a better world by serving children and strengthening families.

Human Services
4
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Knoxville Tn Inc

We offer temporary lodging for families having critically ill children. See page Part III for more information.

Health
5
Texas Children's Hospital Foundation

To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.

Health
6
The Retreat Home for Children

Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.

Crime & Legal
7
Texas Baptist Children's Home and Family Services Inc

Provision and management of property on which a family of nonprofit ministries carries out programs and services for vulnerable children and families.

Human Services
8
Ronald McDonald House of Dallas Inc

Our mission is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. We support the health and well-being of seriously ill or injured children receiving treatment in the…

—
9
Camp Aranzazu Inc

Camp Aranzazu cultivates belonging for campers of all ages and abilities by creating accessible, empowering and intentional camp experiences.

Human Services
10
Ronald Mcdonald House Charities Greater Houston Inc

The mission of the ronald mcdonald house of houston, inc. is to offer a home away from home and to provide care, compassion, and hope to families with seriously ill children being treated in texas medical center member institutions.

Health
11
The Beacon of Downtown Houston

To provide essential and next-step services to restore hope and help end homelessness in houston.

Health
12
Scott & White Hospital-College Station

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Texas Gulf Coast & Louisiana Inc; the most unlike its peers is Starkey Hearing Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
7/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Still Creek Boys Ranch Inc: $418,132 · Human ServicesStill Creek Boys Ranch IncCamp Kesem National: $23,961 · Human ServicesCamp Kesem NationalVARIOUS: $68,750 · OtherVARIOUSMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTH TEXAS: $68,500 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL …VARIOUS UNDER 500000: $67,000 · OtherVARIOUS UNDER 500000CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $60,837 · OtherCHI OMEGA FOUNDATIONDelta Gamma Sorority Association: $17,847 · OtherDelta Gamma Sorority AssociationBRAZOS PRENATAL FOUNDATION: $13,439 · Other+4 more: $32,685 · Other+4 moreTHE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY: $90,000 · EducationTHE ASSOCIAT…ZETA TAU ALPHA FOUNDATION: $20,037 · EducationZETA TAU ALP…Kingdom Ranch: $5,250 · EducationMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST & LOUISIANA INC: $17,800 · HealthMARCH OF DIMES INC: $11,000 · HealthHOPE PREGNANCY CENTER OF BRAZOS VALLEY: $7,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $6,959 · HealthStarkey Hearing Foundation: $6,641 · HealthBrazos County Rape Crisis Center Inc: $6,638 · HealthRonald McDonald House Global: $6,615 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $6,000 · HealthS O S Ministries INC: $21,422 · ReligionBridge Ministries of Bryan Texas: $17,409 · ReligionKAIROS INTERNATIONAL INC: $16,764 · ReligionMISSION DISCOVERY INC: $5,074 · ReligionST JUDE INC: $26,478 · Housing & ShelterBoys Club of Brazos County Inc: $19,728 · Youth DevelopmentFree the Oppressed: $5,500 · International
Human Services$442,093Other$329,058Education$115,287Health$69,153Religion$60,669Housing & Shelter$26,478Youth Development$19,728International$5,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetStill Creek Boys Ranch Inc: $418,132 over 7y, 3.9% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTH TEXAS: $68,500 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCHI OMEGA FOUNDATION: $60,837 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE INC: $26,478 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $23,961 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetS O S Ministries INC: $21,422 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetZETA TAU ALPHA FOUNDATION: $20,037 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBoys Club of Brazos County Inc: $19,728 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetDelta Gamma Sorority Association: $17,847 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST & LOUISIANA INC: $17,800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBridge Ministries of Bryan Texas: $17,409 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetKAIROS INTERNATIONAL INC: $16,764 over 2y, 32% of budgetMARCH OF DIMES INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPE PREGNANCY CENTER OF BRAZOS VALLEY: $7,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $6,959 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBrazos County Rape Crisis Center Inc: $6,638 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetRonald McDonald House Global: $6,615 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTwin City Mission: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFree the Oppressed: $5,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Winkler Nina Astin Tr…Nina Heard Astin Char…Greater Houston Commu…Shell USA Company Fou…Orr Waldon H and Adel…Gilbert & Thyra Plass…Lucille and John B Do…Edge Eugene III Chari…Enterprise Holdings F…Natl Christian Charit…The Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…
Winkler Nina Astin TrustMO17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Winkler Nina Astin Trust · Nina Heard Astin Charitable Trust · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Orr Waldon H and Adele Charitable Trust · Gilbert & Thyra Plass Charitable Trust · Lucille and John B Dougherty Trust · Edge Eugene III Charitable Trust · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chi Omega Fraternity XI Kappa funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chi Omega Fraternity XI Kappa. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chi Omega Fraternity XI Kappa’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home