· Public charity
Chi Omega Fraternity XI Kappa
The mission of chi omega fraternity, xi kappa chapter, is to provide an environment that promotes community service, high scholarship and leadership opportunities for its members.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 17 grants below total $311,768 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $360,313 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $48,545 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $85k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $86k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $141k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS TAMU | $90,000 |
| STILL CREEK BOYS RANCH INC | $51,283 |
| CHI OMEGA | $37,772 |
| MAKE-A-WISH | $30,000 |
| DELTA GAMMA | $17,847 |
| CAMP KESEM | $9,787 |
| ZETA TAU ALPHA FOUNDATION | $9,787 |
| BRAZOS PRENATAL FOUNDATION | $7,689 |
| THE BRIDGE MINISTRIES | $7,689 |
| THE LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $6,959 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF BRAZOS | $6,811 |
| STARKEY HEARING FOUNDATION | $6,641 |
| SEXUAL ASSAULT RESOUCE CENTER | $6,638 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $6,615 |
| SOS MINISTRIES | $6,172 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $276k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of 0% since the first grant, against -24% for the ones you funded once.
13 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $140k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCStill Creek Boys Ranch Inc7× · 2018–2025 · $418k · revenue +48%
- ZTZETA TAU ALPHA FOUNDATION2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +6%
- MFMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST & LOUISIANA INC2× · 2018–2019 · $18k · revenue +109%
Funded once
- VVARIOUSone grant, 2019 · $69k
- VUVARIOUS UNDER 500000one grant, 2020 · $67k
- DGDELTA GAMMA FRATERNITYone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Texas baptist children's home embraces children and families in need in order to empower and equip them for a promising future.
Sharing jesus, healing hearts, transforming lives.
Children at heart ministries is a family of christian ministries that exists to honor god and build a better world by serving children and strengthening families.
We offer temporary lodging for families having critically ill children. See page Part III for more information.
To create a healthier future for children and women throughout our global community by leading in patient care, education and research.
Our mission is to show the love of christ to each and every child and family towhom we serve and beyond. we do this by creating a culture where the needs of children,families, and staff are seen and met in creative and innovative ways.
Provision and management of property on which a family of nonprofit ministries carries out programs and services for vulnerable children and families.
Our mission is to provide essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare. We support the health and well-being of seriously ill or injured children receiving treatment in the…
Camp Aranzazu cultivates belonging for campers of all ages and abilities by creating accessible, empowering and intentional camp experiences.
The mission of the ronald mcdonald house of houston, inc. is to offer a home away from home and to provide care, compassion, and hope to families with seriously ill children being treated in texas medical center member institutions.
To provide essential and next-step services to restore hope and help end homelessness in houston.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of the Texas Gulf Coast & Louisiana Inc and the most unlike its peers is Starkey Hearing Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Still Creek Boys Ranch Inc ↗
- Who funds THE ASSOCIATION OF FORMER STUDENTS OF TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF CENTRAL & SOUTH TEXAS ↗
- Who funds CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE INC ↗
- Who funds Camp Kesem National ↗
- Who funds S O S Ministries INC ↗
- Who funds ZETA TAU ALPHA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Boys Club of Brazos County Inc ↗
- Who funds Delta Gamma Sorority Association ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS GULF COAST & LOUISIANA INC ↗
- Who funds Bridge Ministries of Bryan Texas ↗
- Who funds KAIROS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE PREGNANCY CENTER OF BRAZOS VALLEY ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds Starkey Hearing Foundation ↗
- Who funds Brazos County Rape Crisis Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Ronald McDonald House Global ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds Twin City Mission ↗
- Who funds Free the Oppressed ↗
- Who funds Kingdom Ranch ↗
- Who funds MISSION DISCOVERY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Winkler Nina Astin Trust · Nina Heard Astin Charitable Trust · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Orr Waldon H and Adele Charitable Trust · Gilbert & Thyra Plass Charitable Trust · Lucille and John B Dougherty Trust · Edge Eugene III Charitable Trust · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Chi Omega Fraternity XI Kappa funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.