Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chesed Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$45k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$225kPhilanthropy$33kInternational$32kHealth$16kHuman Services$9kCrime & Legal$4kHousing & Shelter$3kPublic Safety & Disaster$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$2,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$750k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DESERT TORAH ACADEMY$11,500
CHABAD OF SOUTHERN NEVADA$7,800
Individual grant recipient$5,000
BEHIND THE BLUE$3,500
Individual grant recipient$3,500
CENTRAL FUND FOR ISRAEL$3,000
QUALITY OF LIFE$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Individual grant recipient$1,800
CHABAD OF EAST BAY$1,800
YJP LAS VEGAS$1,000
FRIENDSHIP CIR OF LV$1,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$500
SAFE NEST$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%NAPA EMERGENCY WOMEN'S SERVICES: $500 → 9%NAPA EMERGENCY WOMEN'S SERVICES: $500 → 9%PROJECT 150: $500 → 13%PROJECT 150: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
NV
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
DC
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$346k · 27 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +93% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

27 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
14

Total granted

$346k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+93%
-12%

Still filing today

30%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyInternationalCrime & LegalHuman ServicesReligionRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    Central Fund of Israel
    9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +145%
  • TJ
    THE JERUSALEM FELLOWSHIPS INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $12k · revenue +135%
  • AG
    AMERICA GIVES INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $7k · revenue +392%

Funded once

  • CA
    CANTOR'S ASSEMBLY
    one grant, 2017 · $4k · revenue -21%
  • AY
    AM YISRAEL CHAI FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $4k · revenue +94%
  • DD
    DEANS DISCRETIONARY FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Remnant of Israel

International humanitarian aid organization. the organization provides aid to people living under the poverty line and subsistent living standards including the elderly, orphans, widows, handicapped, homeless, abused, new immigrants, and…

—
2
Sherit Isroel
—
3
Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary

To prepare students for the rabbinate and to issue the traditional certificate of ordination in connection therewith. the seminary is authorized to confer the degree of master of hebrew literature (m.h.l.), doctor of hebrew literature…

Education
4
Sar Shalom Israel

To support the needy in israel.

Philanthropy
5
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
6
Mishken Chaim Rivnits

Assistance to the indigent

Religion
7
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
8
Shelters for Israel

Founded in 1948, Shelters for Israels mission is to provide funding for vital projects, programs, and facilities in Israel to support the neediest populations, with a focus on improving the lives of children and the elderly, including…

—
9
Dorot Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Yad Ezra V'shulamit

Yad ezra v'shulamit's mission is to provide over 300,000 people in israel with food and basic supplies for those living in poverty by distributing 12,000 weekly food baskets. with a focus on children we try to ensure that hundreds of…

International
11
Rescue in Israel

Rescue in israel exists as ohel avraham (abrahams tent) in israel ohel avraham carries out the day to day work, working with the homeless on the streets of tel aviv. ohel avraham is a registered not for profit organization in israel. ohel…

—
12
Connect Israel

Connect israel is a life-long program that aims to strengthen the gap between american jews and israelis through business, creative teamwork, and developing personal relationships.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Habitat for Humanity Inc; the most unlike its peers is News. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHABAD OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INC: $109,969 · OtherCHABAD OF SOUTHERN NEVADA INCBEIT KNESSET MORESHET YISRAEL: $29,000 · OtherBEIT KNESSET MORESHET YISRAELCHABAD OF EAST BAY: $26,300 · OtherCHABAD OF EAST BAYIndividual grant recipient: $22,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientAISH HA TORAH: $19,000 · OtherAISH HA TORAHFRIENDSHIP CIR OF LV: $12,000 · OtherQUALITY OF LIFE FOUNDATION: $11,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,466 · Other+26 more: $70,651 · Other+26 moreCentral Fund of Israel: $29,500 · InternationalCentral Fund…THE JERUSALEM FELLOWSHIPS INC: $12,000 · InternationalTHE JERUSALE…AMERICA GIVES INC: $7,000 · PhilanthropyQUALITY OF LIFE INC: $4,500 · PhilanthropyBEHIND THE BLUE: $3,500 · PhilanthropyCANTOR'S ASSEMBLY: $4,000 · ReligionSOROPTIMIST INTL OF MCMINNVILLE: $3,000 · Crime & LegalINTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF POLICE CHAPLAINS INC: $600 · Crime & LegalAM YISRAEL CHAI FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 · EducationPROJECT 150: $1,000 · Human ServicesNEWS: $1,000 · Human Services
Other$310,386International$41,500Philanthropy$15,000Religion$4,000Crime & Legal$3,600Education$3,500Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCentral Fund of Israel: $29,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JERUSALEM FELLOWSHIPS INC: $12,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICA GIVES INC: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetQUALITY OF LIFE INC: $4,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCANTOR'S ASSEMBLY: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAM YISRAEL CHAI FOUNDATION INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBEHIND THE BLUE: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $2,500 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetNAMI SOUTHERN NEVADA: $2,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT 150: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEWS: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF POLICE CHAPLAINS INC: $600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAMAH IN THE ROCKIES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOPPORTUNITY VILLAGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Central Fund of Israel ↗
  • Who funds THE JERUSALEM FELLOWSHIPS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICA GIVES INC ↗
  • Who funds QUALITY OF LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds CANTOR'S ASSEMBLY ↗
  • Who funds AM YISRAEL CHAI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BEHIND THE BLUE ↗
  • Who funds SOROPTIMIST INTL OF MCMINNVILLE ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT 150 ↗
  • Who funds NEWS ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF POLICE CHAPLAINS INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY16.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chesed Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chesed Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Chesed Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Chesed Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chesed’s filings →

    More from the funding graph