Skip to content

· Private foundation

Cherry Picker Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$373kAnimals$83kArts & Culture$60kHealth$48kRecreation & Sports$33kHousing & Shelter$18kCommunity Improvement$10k
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $35k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$752k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BIXBY & ASSOCIATES - BIXBY SCHOOLS$25,000
ALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION$10,000
EXPLORA$10,000
SPECIAL OLYMPICS - NEW MEXICO$5,000
ALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
NM CANCER CENTER$5,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - NM$5,000
ANIMAL HUMANE - NEW MEXICO$5,000
NM ANIMAL FRIENDS$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $10k → 17%ANIMAL HUMANE - NEW MEXICO: $5k → 14%BIXBY & ASSOCIATES - BIXBY SCHOOLS: $25k → 12%THE SUMMIT SCHOOL: $2k → 6%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%ANIMAL HUMANE - NEW MEXICO: $5k → 14%BIXBY & ASSOCIATES - BIXBY SCHOOLS: $10k → 12%THE SUMMIT SCHOOL: $2k → 6%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $5k → 17%ANIMAL HUMANE - NEW MEXICO: $5k → 14%SNOW LION PRESCHOOL: $9k → 12%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 17%ANIMAL HUMANE - NEW MEXICO: $5k → 14%BIXBY & ASSOCIATES - BIXBY SCHOOLS: $5k → 12%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 17%ANIMAL HUMANE - NEW MEXICO: $5k → 14%COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 17%ANIMAL HUMANE - NEW MEXICO: $5k → 14%COLUMBIA DIVING: $5k → 17%ANIMAL HUMANE - NEW MEXICO: $5k → 14%NM CANCER CENTER: $10k → 14%NM CANCER CENTER: $10k → 14%NM CANCER CENTER: $10k → 14%NM CANCER CENTER: $10k → 14%SPECIAL OLYMPICS - NEW MEXICO: $6k → 14%SPECIAL OLYMPICS - NEW MEXICO: $6k → 14%SPECIAL OLYMPICS - NEW MEXICO: $6k → 14%ALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY: $5k → 14%NM CANCER CENTER: $5k → 14%SPECIAL OLYMPICS - NEW MEXICO: $5k → 14%SPECIAL OLYMPICS - NEW MEXICO: $5k → 14%SPECIAL OLYMPICS - NEW MEXICO: $5k → 14%SPECIAL OLYMPICS - NEW MEXICO: $5k → 14%ALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY: $5k → 14%EXPLORA: $260k → 14%EXPLORA: $10k → 14%EXPLORA: $10k → 14%EXPLORA: $10k → 14%EXPLORA: $10k → 14%EXPLORA: $10k → 14%EXPLORA: $10k → 14%NM ANIMAL FRIENDS: $10k → 14%NM ANIMAL FRIENDS: $10k → 14%NM ANIMAL FRIENDS: $10k → 14%NM ANIMAL FRIENDS: $10k → 14%NM ANIMAL FRIENDS: $8k → 14%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - NM: $5k → 14%NM ANIMAL FRIENDS: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$640k · 10 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +34% since the first grant, against +10% for those funded once.

10 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
3

Total granted

$640k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+34%
+10%

Still filing today

80%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureAnimalsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ES
    EXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $320k · revenue +111%
  • AM
    ALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCORPORATED
    7× · 2019–2025 · $70k · revenue +48%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO ANIMAL FRIENDS INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $58k · revenue +9%

Funded once

  • GN
    GROUNDWORKS NM
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • SL
    SNOW LION PRESCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $9k · revenue +10%
  • UC
    UNM CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2024 · $8k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Bosque School

To create transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate contribution to a more just world.

Education
2
Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation

Our mission is to inspire excellence in education and learning in northern new mexico through innovative programming, collaboration and advocacy.

Education
3
Colorado Academy

Creating curious, kind, courageous, and adventurous learners and leaders.

Education
4
International School of Arizona

Our mission is to provide a progressive international education and advanced multilingual academics in a safe, diverse, and nurturing environment. our innovative and individualized approach to learning prepares highly motivated students…

Education
5
Manzano Day School

Manzano day school is dedicated to innovative child-centered education, excellence in teaching, and joy in learning to prepare children for a life of discovery and community involvement in our diverse world.

Education
6
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
7
Escuela Del Sol Montessori Inc

To Inspire a Passion for Life-Long Learning.

Education
8
University of New Mexico Foundation Inc

Create powerful engagements and partnerships that lead to increased philanthropy, investment, innovation, and support for the university of new mexico.

Education
9
Junior Achievement of New Mexico

Provide additional educational opportunities to public school and other students.

International
10
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
11
Santa Fe Animal Shelter and Humane Society Inc

To support animals, save lives, and spread compassion.

Animals
12
Silver Spruce Academy Inc

Silver spruce academy provides supplemental programs and resources utilized in curriculum education to students and families throughout the four corners area, in collaboration wtih other educational institutions.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Explora Science Center & Children's Museum of Albuquerque Inc; the most unlike its peers is New Mexico Animal Friends Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC: $320,000 · Arts & CultureEXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INCALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $70,000 · Arts & CultureALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCORPORATEDNM CANCER CENTER: $45,000 · OtherNM CANCER CENTERBIXBY & ASSOCIATES: $40,000 · OtherBIXBY & ASSOCIATESSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW MEXICO INC: $38,000 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW MEXIC…HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - NM: $18,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - NMGROUNDWORKS NM: $10,000 · OtherGROUNDWORKS NMUNM CANCER CENTER: $8,000 · Other+1 more: $5,000 · OtherNEW MEXICO ANIMAL FRIENDS INC: $58,000 · AnimalsNEW MEXICO ANI…ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC: $35,000 · AnimalsANIMAL HUMANE …THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $27,500 · EducationALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY: $10,000 · EducationSNOW LION PRESCHOOL: $9,413 · EducationHUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TA THE SU: $6,000 · EducationGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5,000 · Housing & Shelter
Arts & Culture$390,000Other$164,000Animals$93,000Education$52,913Housing & Shelter$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC: $320,000 over 7y, 3.0% of budgetALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCORPORATED: $70,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetNEW MEXICO ANIMAL FRIENDS INC: $58,000 over 7y, 15% of budgetBIXBY & ASSOCIATES: $40,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW MEXICO INC: $38,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC: $35,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $27,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSNOW LION PRESCHOOL: $9,413 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetHUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TA THE SU: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EXPLORA SCIENCE CENTER & CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF ALBUQUERQUE INC ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO ANIMAL FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BIXBY & ASSOCIATES ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW MEXICO INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL HUMANE ASSOCIATION OF NEW MEXICO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds SNOW LION PRESCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TA THE SU ↗
  • Who funds GREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community FoundationNM15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Cherry Picker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Cherry Picker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Cherry Picker Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Cherry Picker Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Cherry Picker’s filings →

    More from the funding graph