· Private foundation
Charlesbank Homes
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 42% of CHARLESBANK HOMES’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
- $50k–250k18 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COMMUNITY ACTION FOR BETTER HOUSING | $75,000 |
| NOAH | $75,000 |
| COMMUNITY TEAM WORK | $75,000 |
| BOSTON NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY LAND TRUST | $75,000 |
| THE HAVEN PROJECT | $57,500 |
| LYNN SHELTER ASSOCIATION INC | $50,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER LOWELL | $50,000 |
| FATHER BILL'S AND MAINSPRING | $50,000 |
| THE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPERS | $50,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY CAPE COD | $50,000 |
| COMMONWEALTH LAND TRUST | $50,000 |
| PLANNING OFFICE FOR URBAN AFFAIRS | $50,000 |
| OLD COLONY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY | $50,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY SOUTH SHORE | $50,000 |
| FAMILY AID | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $510k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 40% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $633k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTH CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC3× · 2021–2023 · $200k · revenue +94%
- SBSOUTHWEST BOSTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES2× · 2021–2022 · $150k · revenue +42%
HALEY HOUSE INC & AFFILIATES3× · 2021–2025 · $150k · revenue +97%
Funded once
- AKABBY KELLEY FOSTER HOUSE INCone grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue +4%
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF WORCESTERone grant, 2024 · $100k
NEWVUE COMMUNITIES INCone grant, 2023 · $76k · revenue -7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Hac's mission is to promote and implement the right of all people on cape cod and the islands to occupy safe and affordable housing. to achieve this goal, hac has concentrated its major programs around rental subsidies, shelter services,…
Cbhfh, an affordable housing developer who brings people together to build homes, communities and hope. cbhfh partners with low and moderate income families to build and rehabilitate simple, decent, energy efficient homes for home…
Facilitating the advancement of low and moderate income persons and other underserved residents in the south shore area of massachusetts and to assist such persons in finding and acquiring suitable housing by providing real estate…
Development of affordable housing
Maha breaks down barriers facing first-time and first-generation home buyers and owners through education, counseling, advocacy, and grassroots organizing.
To promote, organize and manage programs that provide affordable housing in order to improve the quality of life in the southeastern massachusetts area.
To promote improved social and economic conditions of families who are or who have recently been homeless; to promote, develop, and manage affordable housing for families and to assist in carrying out the charitable purposes of house of…
Neighborworks housing solutions provides neighborhood revitalization through promoting, developing and maintaining affordable housing in southeastern massachusetts
Safe harbour provides a continuum of housing and supportive services for homeless and nearly homeless individuals and families in our communities.
Preserve affordable low income housing in boston and the surrounding area
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Bread & Roses Housing Inc and the most unlike its peers is Chinatown Community Land Trust Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
51 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 51 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY NORTH CENTRAL MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER LOWELL INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNING OFFICE FOR URBAN AFFAIRS INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST BOSTON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION AND AFFILIATES ↗
- Who funds HALEY HOUSE INC & AFFILIATES ↗
- Who funds WORCESTER COMMON GROUND INC ↗
- Who funds BAY COVE HUMAN SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds CARITAS COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNER HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds OLD COLONY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ↗
- Who funds HEADING HOME INC ↗
- Who funds ABBY KELLEY FOSTER HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPERS INC ↗
- Who funds ACTION INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY GREATER BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH MIDDLESEX OPPORTUNITY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds NEWVUE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Community Teamwork Inc ↗
- Who funds Buzzards Bay Area Habitat For Humanity Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION FOR BETTER HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds INDEPENDENT HOUSING SOLUTIONS INC ↗
- Who funds SAINT FRANCIS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN BERKSHIRE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds The Haven Project Inc ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S INSTITUTE FOR HOUSING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
- Who funds FATHER BILL'S & MAINSPRING INC ↗
- Who funds LAWRENCE COMMUNITYWORKS INC ↗
- Who funds WELLSPRING HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HEARTHWAY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Amelia Peabody Charitable Fund Trust · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Td Charitable Foundation · Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Massachusetts Bankers Association Charitable Foundation Inc · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Health Resources in Action Inc · Agnes M Lindsay Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Charlesbank Homes funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Bridges Homeward Inc — 77% of income from government
- Bay Cove Human Services Inc — 70% of income from government
- Vietnam Veterans Workshop Inc Dba New England Center and Home for Veterans — 66% of income from government
- Dove Inc — 60% of income from government
- Victory Programs Inc — 49% of income from government
- Newvue Communities Inc — 40% of income from government
- Father Bill's & Mainspring Inc — 24% of income from government
- Community Teamwork Inc — 23% of income from government
- Rural Development Inc — 18% of income from government
- South Middlesex Opportunity Council Inc — 18% of income from government
- Saint Francis House Inc — 18% of income from government
- Heading Home Inc — 17% of income from government
- Emh Recovery Inc — 14% of income from government
- Lynn Shelter Association Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Sojourner House Inc — 11% of income from government
- Wellspring House Inc — 9% of income from government
- Lawrence Communityworks Inc — 9% of income from government
- Familyaid Boston Inc — 4% of income from government
- The Neighborhood Developers Inc — 3% of income from government
- Action Inc — 3% of income from government
- Hearthway Inc — 2% of income from government
- Jeremiah's Inn Inc — 2% of income from government
- Island Housing Trust Corporation — 1% of income from government
- Worcester Common Ground Inc — 1% of income from government
- Rosie's Place Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Charlesbank Homes?
Find your warmest path to Charlesbank Homes through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.