Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Charles W Harris Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$512k
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$63k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Human Services$741kArts & Culture$394kFood & Nutrition$272kHousing & Shelter$102kCrime & Legal$36kPublic Safety & Disaster$35kPhilanthropy$33kYouth Development$31kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $65k
  • $10k–50k13 grants · $185k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $263k
$10,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC$62,500
COMMUNITY FOOD BANK EASTERN OKLAHOM$50,000
MEALS ON WHEELS$50,000
CLAREHOUSE$50,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$50,000
IRON GATE$25,000
REVITALIZE T-TOWN$20,000
TULSA BOYS HOME$15,000
WWII AIRBORNE DEMONSTRATION TEAM$15,000
TULSA DAY CENTER FOR THE HOMELESS$15,000
COOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL$15,000
LIFE SENIOR SERVICES$15,000
JOHN 316 MISSION$15,000
YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA$10,000
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $348k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%COOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $15k → 18%TFI FAMILY SERVICES INC: $5k → 14%COOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $5k → 18%TFI FAMILY SERVICES INC: $2k → 14%JOHN 316 MISSION: $15k → 14%JOHN 316 MISSION: $10k → 14%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $8k → 14%FLOURISH HOMES: $8k → 14%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $5k → 14%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $5k → 14%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $5k → 14%THE SPRING SHELTER INC: $5k → 15%JOHN 316 MISSION: $5k → 14%JOHN 316 MISSION: $5k → 14%THE SPRING SHELTER INC: $5k → 15%FLOURISH HOMES: $5k → 14%FLOURISH HOMES: $5k → 14%THE SPRING SHELTER INC: $5k → 15%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $2k → 14%DAYSPRING VILLA: $3k → 15%NEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $1k → 14%CLAREHOUSE: $50k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $35k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $25k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $2k → 15%CLAREHOUSE: $2k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $30k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $15k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $10k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $10k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $5k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $5k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES: $5k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $2k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $10k → 15%YOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 32 repeat orgs$67k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
5

Total granted

$1.6M
$65k

Still filing today

84%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterArts & CultureFood & NutritionHealthReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EA
    EAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $260k · revenue +38%
  • Meals on Wheels of Norman Inc
    6× · 2019–2024 · $123k · revenue +36%
  • Clarehouse Inc
    5× · 2019–2024 · $114k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $35k
  • PC
    PORTA CAELI HOUSE CORP
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • TA
    TULSA ADVOCATES FOR PROTECTION CHIL
    one grant, 2019 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
2
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

3
Tulsa Volunteers of America Senior Housing Inc

Provides housing to elderly persons under section 202 of the national housing act under agreement with the department of hud.

4
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
5
Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa

Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa provides essential services that remove barriers, strengthen families, and promote healing when children need healthcare.

6
Oklahoma City Housing Services Redevelopment Corporation

To revitalize urban oklahoma city neighborhoods and create affordable housing opportunities by rehabilitating historic homes, constructing new homes, and increasing community investment through home ownership.

Housing & Shelter
7
Tulsa Neighborhood Networks Inc

Provide the poor of the city of tulsa, oklahoma an opportunity to improve their quality of life through guidance and training in the areas of education, employment, family skills, healthcare, housing, socialization and spirituality.

Community Improvement
8
Shelterwell Inc

Shelterwell fosters a spirit of connected community, centered on the belief that housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
9
La Luz Organization Inc

La Luz Organization helps the underserved Latino population in Oklahoma with culturally and faith based trauma-informed services to victims of domestic violence,sexual assault and stalking.

Human Services
10
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

11
Habitat for Humanity of Okaloosa County Inc

Okaloosa habitat for humanity is a non-profit, christian organization dedicated to eliminating substandard housing in okaloosa county. we provide opportunites for the community to show god's love in action. through partnership with people…

Housing & Shelter
12
Ywca Tulsa Inc

Ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tulsa Day Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Flourish Homes Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyRegional Business AdvocacyAddiction Recovery & Mental…Tulsa Arts & Cultural Insti…Poverty Relief & Basic NeedsTulsa-Based Philanthropic F…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr17%38%20–35yr14%24%35–55yr14%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr17%34%20–35yr14%28%35–55yr14%34%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/31
the rest of the field
15%
659/4,403

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/29
Grantees still filing
21/29
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CHARLES W HARRIS PAWHUSKA AIRPORT F — $230,000 · OtherCHARLES W HARRIS PAWHUSKA AIRPORT FCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $85,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE…Individual grant recipient — $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPORTA CAELI HOUSE CORP — $25,000 · OtherUP WITH TREES INC — $20,000 · OtherPROJECT SANTA-SALVATION ARMY — $20,000 · OtherIRON GATE INC — $37,500 · OtherIRON GATE INCBARTLESVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $30,000 · OtherBARTLESVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+11 more — $79,750 · Other+11 moreClarehouse Inc — $113,500 · Human ServicesClarehouse IncLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INCJOHN 316 MISSION — $35,000 · Human ServicesJOHN 316 MISSIONTULSA BOYS' HOME INC — $30,000 · Human ServicesTULSA BOYS' HOME INCNEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE — $25,700 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINEASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC — $22,000 · Human ServicesASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULS…COOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesFLOURISH HOMES INCORPORATED — $17,500 · Human ServicesTHE SPRING SHELTER INC — $17,500 · Human Services+1 more — $7,250 · Human ServicesEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC — $260,000 · Arts & CultureEAA AVIATION FOUNDAT…WWII AIRBORNE DEMONSTRATION TEAM — $40,000 · Arts & CultureWWII AIRBORNE DEMONS…Meals on Wheels of Norman Inc — $122,500 · Food & NutritionMeals on Wheels…COMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $112,000 · Food & NutritionCOMMUNITY FOOD …EAA VINTAGE AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION INC — $92,500 · EducationREVITALIZE T-TOWN — $46,000 · Housing & ShelterTULSA DAY CENTER INC — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterTransitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc — $8,000 · Housing & ShelterHONOR BUNKER INC — $24,700 · HealthPALMER CONTINUUM OF CARE INC — $15,500 · Health
Other$562,250Human Services$378,450Arts & Culture$300,000Food & Nutrition$234,500Education$92,500Housing & Shelter$84,000Health$40,200

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC — $260,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc — $122,500 over 6y, 5.7% of budgetClarehouse Inc — $113,500 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $112,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEAA VINTAGE AIRCRAFT ASSOCIATION INC — $92,500 over 4y, 14% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE ARCHDIOCESE OF OKLAHOMA CITY INC — $85,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC — $70,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetREVITALIZE T-TOWN — $46,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetWWII AIRBORNE DEMONSTRATION TEAM — $40,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetIRON GATE INC — $37,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJOHN 316 MISSION — $35,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBARTLESVILLE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetTULSA DAY CENTER INC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE — $25,700 over 6y, 1.5% of budgetHONOR BUNKER INC — $24,700 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC — $22,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetCOOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUP WITH TREES INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFLOURISH HOMES INCORPORATED — $17,500 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetTHE SPRING SHELTER INC — $17,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetPALMER CONTINUUM OF CARE INC — $15,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTULSA ADVOCATES FOR THE PROTECTION OF CHILDREN — $15,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTransitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc — $8,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetOne Hope Tulsa Inc — $7,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetTFI FAMILY SERVICES INC — $7,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paul L Sisk and Helen I Sisk Charitable TrustOK39.1× affinity16 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paul L Sisk and Helen I Sisk Charitable Trust · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · Tulsa Community Foundation · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Flint Family Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Sarkeys Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · The David E & Cassie L Temple Foundation · Hille Family Charitable Foundation · Oneok Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Charles W Harris Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 140%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 9%
  • Up With Trees Inc100% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation11% of income from government
  • Tulsa Day Center Inc9% of income from government
  • Youth Services of Tulsa Inc8% of income from government
  • Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Charles W Harris Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Charles W Harris Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph