Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Charles H Stout Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$530k
Granted FY2025still arriving
27
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$64k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$1.0MArts & Culture$872kHealth$541kHuman Services$462kHousing & Shelter$342kYouth Development$293kEnvironment$169kCivil Rights$154kOther$0
02FY2025 · 27 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $27k
  • $10k–50k19 grants · $389k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $114k
$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$9.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF SF$63,500
GIVEDIRECTLY$50,000
LAW COLLEGE ASSOCIATION UNIV OF AZ$40,000
SAFE PARKING LA$34,500
THE BRIGID ALLIANCE$26,300
UC SAN DIEGO$25,500
LONE STAR FLIGHT MUSEUM$25,200
THE CUPCAKE GIRLS$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NY$25,000
THUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVAT SOCIETY$22,500
INT'L REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT$21,500
HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS$21,000
NV PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA$20,000
TEXAS HEART INSTITUTE$13,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $525k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAROL'S KITCHEN: $3k → 9%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $20k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $18k → 14%DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER: $12k → 14%THE CUPCAKE GIRLS: $30k → 13%THE CUPCAKE GIRLS: $25k → 13%THE CUPCAKE GIRLS: $22k → 13%NEVADA PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERIC: $20k → 13%ANGELS FOSTER FAMILY AGENCY: $2k → 11%JOVENES: $15k → 14%COMPASS FAMILY SERVICES: $10k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $20k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $20k → 10%NEXT STEP SERVICE DOGS: $500 → 11%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $26k → 17%THE EMPOWERMENT CENTER: $1k → 10%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $22k → 17%THE EMPOWERMENT CENTER: $1k → 10%THE BRIGID ALLIANCE: $22k → 17%INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PR: $30k → 17%INT'L REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PR: $30k → 17%INT'L REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $25k → 17%INT'L REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $22k → 17%INT'L REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT: $20k → 17%RIDGE HOUSE INC: $1k → 10%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 10%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S CABINET: $10k → 10%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S CABINET: $10k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S CABINET: $8k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S CABINET: $5k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S CABINET: $5k → 10%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE: $5k → 10%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $5k → 10%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER (: $5k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S CABINET: $4k → 10%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER (: $4k → 10%THE CHILDREN'S CABINET: $3k → 10%WOMEN AND CHILDREN'S CENTER OF THE: $1k → 10%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF RENO-SPARKS: $5k → 10%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF RENO-SPARKS: $5k → 10%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF RENO-SPARKS: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
NV
IA
CA
VA
AZ
AR
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.0M · 76 repeat orgs$364k to everyone else

76 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 56 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

76
34

Total granted

$4.0M
$291k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+72%

Still filing today

74%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $74k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $224k · revenue +49%
  • BARNARD COLLEGE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $196k · revenue +60%
  • University of San Francisco
    5× · 2017–2021 · $168k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • IR
    INT'L REFUGEE ASSITANCE PR
    one grant, 2021 · $30k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCI
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
  • NW
    NATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUMgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue +100%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory

The San Francisco Bay Bird Observatory is dedicated to the conservation of birds and their habitats through science and outreach.

Environment
3
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
4
The American Institute of Architects California

The AIA California, in collaboration with local components, is the voice of the architectural profession.

—
5
The Nevada Discovery Museum

Educating children and adults through interactive hands-on exhibits and educational programming.

—
6
Carson Tahoe Regional Healthcare

To enhance the health and well-being of the communities we serve.

Health
7
Valle Del Sol Inc

Valle del sol inspires positive change by investing in health and human services to strengthen families with tools and skills for self-sufficiency and by building the next generation of latino and diverse leaders.

Health
8
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
9
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
10
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
11
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
12
Di Rosa Preserve

Located in scenic Napa Valley, di Rosa Center for Contemporary Art engages its community in the connective power of art and nature through its permanent collection of Northern California art, contemporary exhibitions, and thought-provoking…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Cabinet Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tahoe Maritime Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Independent K-12 SchoolsPregnancy Support ServicesDomestic Violence ServicesFood Banks and PantriesEnvironmental Conservation …Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Community Arts CentersVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%32%20–35yr13%27%35–55yr16%23%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%4%10–20yr16%33%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%31%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/86
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,479

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

84 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 84 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
82/84
Grantees still filing
68/84
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF SF — $264,700 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SFUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO FOUNDATI — $181,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO FOUNDATITHE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CA — $147,500 · OtherTHE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CASKY MOUNTAIN LIFE SCHOOLSKY MOUNTA — $130,000 · OtherSKY MOUNTAIN LIFE SCHOOLSKY MOUNTALOTUS BLOOM FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER — $85,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO — $83,500 · OtherCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS — $65,000 · Other+51 more — $903,966 · Other+51 moreINTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC — $126,500 · Human ServicesINTERNATIONAL R…GIVEDIRECTLY INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesGIVEDIRECTLY IN…THE CUPCAKE GIRLS — $76,500 · Human ServicesTHE CUPCAKE GIR…THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC — $69,300 · Human ServicesTHE BRIGID ALLI…DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $50,000 · Human ServicesDOWNTOWN WOMEN'…DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER — $49,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLEN…THE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC — $44,000 · Human ServicesTHE CHILDREN'S …Larkin Street Youth Services — $40,000 · Human ServicesLarkin Street Y…+10 more — $69,500 · Human Services+10 moreBARNARD COLLEGE — $196,000 · EducationBARNARD COLLEGEUniversity of San Francisco — $167,500 · EducationUniversity of S…TORCH OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION — $65,200 · EducationTORCH OF FREEDO…Oakland Leaf Foundation — $55,000 · EducationOakland Leaf Fo…DEMOCRACY PREP AT THE AGASSI CAMPUS — $50,000 · EducationDEMOCRACY PREP …BLACK PINE CIRCLE INC — $40,000 · EducationBLACK PINE CIRC…+3 more — $30,000 · EducationTHUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY — $223,600 · Arts & CultureTHUNDERBIRD LOD…Lone Star Flight Museum — $125,200 · Arts & CultureLone Star Fligh…ARTWATCH INTERNATIONAL INC — $50,000 · Arts & CultureARTWATCH INTERN…EBELL FRIENDS — $34,500 · Arts & CultureEBELL FRIENDSSAN DIEGO AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC — $32,500 · Arts & CultureSAN DIEGO AIR &…Nevada Museum of Art — $27,500 · Arts & CultureRENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC — $26,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM — $20,000 · Arts & CultureNEW MILE MEDIA ARTS — $20,000 · Arts & Culture+9 more — $36,000 · Arts & Culture+9 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC — $150,000 · HealthPLANNED P…PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC — $150,000 · HealthPLANNED P…Texas Heart Institute — $38,500 · HealthTexas Hea…PLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC — $20,000 · Health+4 more — $19,000 · HealthHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC — $165,900 · Housing & ShelterSafe Parking LA — $69,500 · Housing & ShelterEAST BAY INNOVATIONS INC — $30,000 · Housing & ShelterCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $101,000 · Community Improvement
Other$1,860,666Human Services$624,800Education$603,700Arts & Culture$595,300Health$377,500Housing & Shelter$265,400Community Improvement$101,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY — $223,600 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE — $196,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco — $167,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC — $165,900 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC — $150,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC — $150,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC — $126,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLone Star Flight Museum — $125,200 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $101,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CUPCAKE GIRLS — $76,500 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetSafe Parking LA — $69,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC — $69,300 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTORCH OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION — $65,200 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetCOALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS — $65,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOakland Leaf Foundation — $55,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetDOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER — $50,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME — $50,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetDEMOCRACY PREP AT THE AGASSI CAMPUS — $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER — $49,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC — $44,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBurn Institute — $41,500 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetBLACK PINE CIRCLE INC — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTAHOE MARITIME FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services — $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTexas Heart Institute — $38,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEBELL FRIENDS — $34,500 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetSAN DIEGO AIR & SPACE MUSEUM INC — $32,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetEAST BAY INNOVATIONS INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNevada Museum of Art — $27,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetRENO PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC — $26,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetWAVES PROJECT INC — $24,916 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTHE ESCONDIDO CREEK CONSERVANCY — $23,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetNATIONAL WOMEN'S HISTORY MUSEUM — $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetNEVADA WOMEN'S FUND — $20,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetHEALTH VOLUNTEERS OVERSEAS INC — $20,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD SOUTHEAST INC — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNEVADA PARALYZED VETERANS OF AMERICA — $20,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANTIQUE BOAT MUSEUM — $16,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE 1701 GROUP FKA ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF RENO-SPARKS — $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJOVENES INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetANZA-BORREGO FOUNDATION — $13,300 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF NEVADA WILDERNESS — $13,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetST LUKE'S FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVeterans Guest House Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetCOMPASS FAMILY SERVICES — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THUNDERBIRD LODGE PRESERVATION SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds University of San Francisco ↗
  • Who funds HOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MAR MONTE INC ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Lone Star Flight Museum ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds GIVEDIRECTLY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CUPCAKE GIRLS ↗
  • Who funds Safe Parking LA ↗
  • Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds TORCH OF FREEDOM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds Oakland Leaf Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ARTWATCH INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds A PLACE CALLED HOME ↗
  • Who funds DEMOCRACY PREP AT THE AGASSI CAMPUS ↗
  • Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S CABINET INC ↗
  • Who funds Burn Institute ↗
  • Who funds BLACK PINE CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds TAHOE MARITIME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Larkin Street Youth Services ↗
  • Who funds Texas Heart Institute ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

NV Energy Charitable …The E L Cord Foundati…Community Foundation …Robert Z Hawkins Foun…John Ben Snow Memoria…The Nell J Redfield F…Dermody Properties Fo…Peek Family Charitabl…Renown HealthWilliam N Pennington …Thelma B & Thomas P H…Tahoe Community Found…
NV Energy Charitable FoundationNV45.4× affinity20 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: NV Energy Charitable Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Robert Z Hawkins Foundation · John Ben Snow Memorial Tr Uw #839158 · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · Dermody Properties Foundation · Peek Family Charitable Foundation · Renown Health · William N Pennington Foundation · Thelma B & Thomas P Hart Foundation · Tahoe Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Charles H Stout Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    34report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 115 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines