Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles G Pearl Scholarship Fund 006961

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$103kReligion$15k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,636
Median grant
1
States reached
$395k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY$5,271
UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS$5,271
UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY$2,636
TRANSYLVANIA UNIVERSITY$2,636
SPALDING UNIVERSITY$2,636
FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH$2,050
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 95% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%JACKSONVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY: $769 → 19%UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY: $1k → 12%GEORGETOWN COLLEGE: $1k → 8%KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $1k → 13%TRANSYLVANIA UNIVERSITY: $4k → 15%SPALDING UNIVERSITY: $3k → 15%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERISTY: $10k → 16%SOMERSET COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $3k → 19%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $4k → 20%MOREHEAD STATE UNIVERSITY: $782 → 21%LINDSEY WILSON COLLEGE: $1k → 22%UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $785 → 24%UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $5k → 26%TRANSYLVANIA UNIVERSITY: $3k → 15%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $6k → 16%SOMERSET COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 19%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $4k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $782 → 24%UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $3k → 26%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $5k → 16%SOMERSET COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 19%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $2k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $769 → 24%UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $2k → 26%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%SOMERSET COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $1k → 19%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $2k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $769 → 24%UNIVERSITY OF CUMBERLANDS: $1k → 26%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%SOMERSET COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $785 → 19%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $1k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $1k → 26%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%SOMERSET COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $785 → 19%FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $1k → 20%UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $785 → 26%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%SOMERSET COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $785 → 19%UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS: $782 → 26%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $1k → 16%SOMERSET COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $782 → 19%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $785 → 16%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $782 → 16%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $782 → 16%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $782 → 16%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $769 → 16%EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $769 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 6% of Charles G Pearl Scholarship Fund 006961’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 97% of the giving stays in KY; by stated purpose, 91%.

Charles G Pearl Scholarship Fund 006961lessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$90k · 8 repeat orgs$27k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +30% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

8 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
16

Total granted

$90k
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+30%
+12%

Still filing today

38%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC
    7× · 2018–2025 · $14k · revenue +90%
  • TU
    TRANSYLVANIA UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +30%
  • AC
    ASBURY COLLEGE
    2× · 2018–2024 · $1k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • WK
    WESTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
  • KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
2
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
5
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
6
Kentucky Christian University

The mission of kentucky christian university is to educate students for christian leadership and service in the church and in professions throughout the world.

Education
7
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
8
Roberts Wesleyan University

As new york's leading university for character education, rwu is a community of learners committed to historic christianity which seeks to prepare thoughtful, spiritually mature, service-oriented people who will transform society.

Education
9
Gardner-Webb University

The university statement of values consists of christian heritage, baptist heritage, academic excellence, liberal arts, teamwork, a student-centered focus, community engagement and diversity.

Education
10
Belhaven University

Belhaven university prepares students academically and spiritually to serve jesus christ in their careers, in human relationships, and in the world of ideas.

Education
11
University of Lynchburg

The mission of the University is to inspire independent thinkers who become trustworthy, effective leaders that shape caring communities. The vision of the University of Lynchburg is to cultivate a world that is innovative, authentic, and…

Education
12
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Campbellsville University Inc; the most unlike its peers is Lincoln Memorial University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY: $23,940 · OtherEASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY: $19,018 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKYFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH: $14,697 · OtherFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $9,796 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOMERSET COMMUNITY COLLEGE: $9,473 · OtherSOMERSET COMMUNITY COLLEGE+9 more: $8,670 · Other+9 moreUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $13,560 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS …TRANSYLVANIA UNIVERSITY: $7,552 · EducationTRANSYLVANIA UNIVERSITYSPALDING UNIVERSITY INC: $2,636 · EducationSPALDING UNIVERSITY INCKENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $1,399 · EducationLINDSEY WILSON UNIVERSITY INC: $1,399 · EducationGEORGETOWN COLLEGE: $1,399 · EducationASBURY COLLEGE: $1,308 · Education+4 more: $2,922 · Education+4 more
Other$85,594Education$32,175

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC: $13,560 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTRANSYLVANIA UNIVERSITY: $7,552 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPALDING UNIVERSITY INC: $2,636 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $1,399 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINDSEY WILSON UNIVERSITY INC: $1,399 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGEORGETOWN COLLEGE: $1,399 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASBURY COLLEGE: $1,308 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCampbellsville University Inc: $743 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC: $743 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY: $718 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEREA COLLEGE: $718 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE CUMBERLANDS INC ↗
  • Who funds TRANSYLVANIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SPALDING UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds KENTUCKY WESLEYAN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds LINDSEY WILSON UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGETOWN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ASBURY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds Campbellsville University Inc ↗
  • Who funds THOMAS MORE UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds LINCOLN MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds BEREA COLLEGE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

John B & Brownie Young Memorial FundKY22.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: John B & Brownie Young Memorial Fund · Council of Independent Colleges · The Community Foundation of Louisville Inc · Flora Hornbeck Scholarship Tr · Woldenberg Foundation · Fidelity Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Charles Eades Scholarship Trust Xxx-Xx-Xxxx · The Ohio Foundation of Independent Colleges · Goldring Family Foundation · Baird Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles G Pearl Scholarship Fund 006961 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles G Pearl Scholarship Fund 006961. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles G Pearl Scholarship Fund 006961’s filings →

    More from the funding graph