Skip to content

· Private foundation

Charles and Janet Andres Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2021
24
Grants FY2021
6
States reached
$13k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

93% of Charles and Janet Andres Family Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Centracare Health Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2021, the last year Charles and Janet Andres Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $95k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
5
’18
10
’19
9
’20
10
’21
11
’22
14
’23
2
’24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$335kPublic Safety & Disaster$70kHuman Services$45kEducation$35kAnimals$21kReligion$16kHousing & Shelter$7kCrime & Legal$5kOther$0
02FY2021 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2021

  • Under $10k21 grants · $60k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $36k
$2,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRACARE FOUNDATION$13,000
UNIVERSITY OF MN MEDICAL FOUNDATION$11,500
ROGERS POLICE ASSOCIATION$11,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CARLETON COLLEGE$5,000
NORTHWEST FIREFIGHTERS CHARITY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
PIMA COUNTY SHERIFF VOLUNTARY AUX$5,000
UPPER IOWA UNIVERSITY$4,000
ST CLARE'S MONASTERY$3,500
MAPLE GROVE LUTHERAN CHURCH$3,000
PROJECT AIRTIME$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
INDIAN PEAKS FIRE PROTECTION DISTR$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LAUGHING AT MY NIGHTMARE: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
MN
NY
IA
IN
PA
CA
UT
CO
MO
MD
AZ
AR
NC
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$262k · 26 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +71% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2021, 6 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2021 (too recent to call). Read against FY2021, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
13

Total granted

$262k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+71%
+41%

Still filing today

38%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationCrime & LegalAnimalsHuman ServicesArts & CultureReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CARLETON COLLEGE
    3× · 2019–2022 · $15k · revenue +32%
  • C
    CORNERHOUSE
    6× · 2018–2023 · $10k · revenue +71%
  • PS
    PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $7k · revenue +424%

Funded once

  • S6
    SHIELD 616 INC
    one grant, 2018 · $3k · revenue -34%
  • CO
    CHINA OUTREACH MINISTRIESINC
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +21%
  • LA
    LAUGHING AT MY NIGHTMARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +41%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Minnesota Foundation Investment Advisors

To provide the highest level of stewardship for university donors through professional management and oversight of the university of minnesota foundation's assets by creating a focused investment environment with clarity of purpose,…

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
University Family Physicians Inc

Engage actively and continuously in medical research, education and training in the practice of medicine in conjunction with the department of family medicine of the indiana university school of medicine and indiana university…

—
4
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
5
University of Iowa Facilities Corporation

The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.

—
6
University Corporation for Atmospheric Research

See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…

Science & Tech
7
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
8
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
9
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
12
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Minnesota Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Pueblo Athletics Booster. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRACARE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $278,400 · HealthCENTRACARE HEALTH FOUNDATION+1 more: $500 · HealthUNIVERSITY OF MN MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $51,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MN MEDICAL FOUNDATIONROGERS POLICE ASSOCIATION: $38,500 · OtherROGERS POLICE ASSOCIATIONNORTHWEST FIREFIGHTERS CHARITY: $18,000 · OtherNORTHWEST FIREFIGHTERS CHARITYST CLARE'S MONASTERY: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherMAPLE GROVE LUTHERAN CHURCH: $9,700 · OtherINDIAN PEAKS FIRE PROTECTION DISTR: $9,500 · Other+33 more: $99,700 · Other+33 moreCARLETON COLLEGE: $15,000 · EducationUPPER IOWA UNIVERSITY: $10,500 · EducationAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $5,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $3,500 · Education+1 more: $500 · EducationCORNERHOUSE: $10,100 · Crime & LegalNW Childrens Foundation: $5,000 · Crime & LegalSHIELD 616 INC: $2,800 · Crime & LegalZENBYCAT: $3,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA: $2,750 · AnimalsTHE BOND BETWEEN: $2,500 · AnimalsPEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC: $7,250 · Housing & ShelterCROSS (CHRISTIANS REACHING OUT IN SOCIAL SERVICES): $6,500 · Religion
Health$278,900Other$246,900Education$34,500Crime & Legal$17,900Animals$8,250Housing & Shelter$7,250Religion$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRACARE HEALTH FOUNDATION: $278,400 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetCARLETON COLLEGE: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER IOWA UNIVERSITY: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCORNERHOUSE: $10,100 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetPEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC: $7,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCROSS (CHRISTIANS REACHING OUT IN SOCIAL SERVICES): $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNW Childrens Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetZENBYCAT: $3,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetSHIELD 616 INC: $2,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA: $2,750 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BOND BETWEEN: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION TO DECREASE WORLD SUCK: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHINA OUTREACH MINISTRIESINC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOULDER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLAUGHING AT MY NIGHTMARE INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGIVEDIRECTLY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDays For Girls International: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CENTRACARE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CARLETON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UPPER IOWA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CORNERHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE SERVING PEOPLE INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSS (CHRISTIANS REACHING OUT IN SOCIAL SERVICES) ↗
  • Who funds NW Childrens Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN INDIAN COLLEGE FUND ↗
  • Who funds Pueblo Athletics Booster ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds ZENBYCAT ↗
  • Who funds SHIELD 616 INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDLIFE REHABILITATION CENTER OF MINNESOTA ↗
  • Who funds THE BOND BETWEEN ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION TO DECREASE WORLD SUCK ↗
  • Who funds CHINA OUTREACH MINISTRIESINC ↗
  • Who funds BOULDER HISTORICAL SOCIETY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chuck and Janet Andres Family FoundationAZ20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chuck and Janet Andres Family Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation · The Jamf Nation Global Foundation · The Graco Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Thrivent Charitable Impact & Investing · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Baird Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Charles and Janet Andres Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Charles and Janet Andres Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Charles and Janet Andres Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Charles and Janet Andres Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Charles and Janet Andres Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph