Loading…
· Private foundation
CHARLES A MASTRONARDI FOUNDATION 061223-000
This foundation accepts unsolicited grant applications.
$968k
Granted FY2024
—
Grants
—
Communities
—
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 96% of CHARLES A MASTRONARDI FOUNDATION 061223-000’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2020
scientific literaryliterary educationaleducational preventionprevention crueltycruelty animals
2021
—
2022
—
2023
—
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
Grant detail is referenced in an attached schedule not included in the e-file. Total reported in the filing: $968,183.
$0
Median grant
—
States reached
$21M
Total assets
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY20–20) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 12%. 63% of your dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
St John's University New York
St. john's university is a catholic, vincentian, metropolitan, and global institution of higher education.
Education
2
New York Medical College
Educate physicians, scientists, public health specialists & other healthcare professionals.
—
3
Saint Joseph's College
While the college suspended all operations in 2017 due to financial challenges, the college has resumed educational aspects in educational certification programs. the mission that the college has faithfully upheld for over 100 years of…
Education
4
New York University
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes.
Education
5
St Catherine University
We educate women to lead and influence.
Education
6
New England College
An independent liberal arts college offering undergraduate, graduate and professional programs.
Education
7
Benedict College
Benedict college will be a power for good in society. the college is a full opportunity college with high quality programs of teaching, research, and public service. these programs provide the students and community with knowledge, skills,…
Education
8
Iona University
Iona university is a catholic university comprised of a diverse community of learners & scholars dedicated to academic excellence in the tradition of the christian brothers.
Education
9
Lourdes University
Lourdes university, rooted in catholic and franciscan traditions, provides a values-centered education that enriches lives and advances academic excellence.
Education
10
Franklin & Marshall College
A residential college dedicated to excellence in undergraduate liberal arts education.
Education
11
Columbia College
Columbia College improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.
Education
12
Le Moyne College
The college is a diverse learning community that strives for academic excellence in the catholic and jesuit tradition through comprehensive programs.
Education
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Inner City Scholarship Fund Inc and the most unlike its peers is St Bonaventure University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 55 years old; the field is 10. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 33% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
Closures · last 5 years
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
orgs you fund
0.0%0/44
the rest of the field
9%
871/9,964
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
05the grantee network
38 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/38
Grantees still filing
30/38
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$4,879,170Health$92,000Education$59,467Environment$25,000Housing & Shelter$18,000Animals$8,000Arts & Culture$7,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WHITE PLAINS MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds ST BONAVENTURE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR HEARING AND COMMUNICATION ↗
- Who funds GEORGIAN COURT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds INNER-CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST CHRISTOPHER'S INN ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds THE GOLDTHWAIT RESERVATION INC ↗
- Who funds DANA'S ANGELS RESEARCH TRUST ↗
- Who funds ANIMALS ASIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COPE CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Salem Five Charitable Foundation IncMA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Salem Five Charitable Foundation Inc · Webster Bank Charitable Foundation · Synchrony Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Mutual of America Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Ibm International Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Ge Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation CHARLES A MASTRONARDI FOUNDATION 061223-000 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
- Raw Art Works Inc — 7% of income from government
- Neighborhood Music School Inc — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
04Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: DANA'S ANGELS RESEARCH TRUST.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
low risk
~43 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.
Track record & reputation
low risk
5 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 516528048 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on DANA'S ANGELS RESEARCH TRUST, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 43 months of cash on hand.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 5% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to Charles a Mastronardi Foundation 061223-000?
Find your warmest path to Charles a Mastronardi Foundation 061223-000 through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines