Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Charity Randall Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$378k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
0182% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$1.4MRecreation & Sports$307kEducation$270kEnvironment$165kAnimals$100kPhilanthropy$35kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $28k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $350k
$150,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
POINT PARK UNIVERSTIY PITTSBURGH PLAYHOUSE$200,000
RIVERLIFE$150,000
NAPLES CHILDREN & EDUCATION FOUNDATION$17,500
THEATREZONE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%MANCHESTER CRAFTSMEN GUILD: $10k → 11%THEATREZONE: $10k → 10%PITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER: $250k → 11%THEATREZONE: $10k → 10%THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $100k → 11%THEATREZONE: $10k → 10%PITTSBURGH ZOO AND PPG AQUARIUM: $100k → 11%NAPLES CHILDREN & EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $18k → 10%THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $75k → 11%NAPLES CHILDREN & EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $18k → 10%NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY: $40k → 11%NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN: $15k → 10%SWEETWATER CENTER FOR THE ARTS: $10k → 11%ALLEGHENY COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION: $150k → 11%ALLEGHENY COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION: $150k → 11%ALLEGHENY COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%PITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY: $1k → 11%PITTSBURGH NATIONAL AVIARY: $300k → 11%PITTSBURGH NATIONAL AVIARY: $150k → 11%RIVERLIFE: $150k → 11%THE ANDY WARHOL MUSEUM: $150k → 11%THE ANDY WARHOL MUSEUM: $100k → 11%PITTSBURGH NATIONAL AVIARY: $50k → 11%DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY: $50k → 11%HEINZ HISTORY CENTER: $200k → 11%POINT PARK UNIVERSTIY PITTSBURGH PLAYHOUSE: $200k → 11%POINT PARK UNIVERSTIY PITTSBURGH PLAYHOUSE: $200k → 11%CLO CABARET SERIES: $100k → 11%PITTSBURGH CIVIC LIGHT OPERA GUILD: $76k → 11%HEINZ HISTORY CENTER: $50k → 11%CLO CABARET SERIES: $50k → 11%PITTSBURGH OPERA: $25k → 11%PITTSBURGH OPERA: $15k → 11%PITTSBURGH OPERA: $15k → 11%CLO GUILD SCHOLARSHIP: $10k → 11%CLO GUILD SCHOLARSHIP: $5k → 11%MENDELSSOHN CHOIR OF PITTSBURGH: $3k → 11%PITTSBURGH CIVIC LIGHT OPERA GUILD: $1k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: $5k → 11%CARNEGIE MUSEUM OF ART: $30k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 12 repeat orgs$624k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +20% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
10

Total granted

$2.3M
$474k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+20%

Still filing today

50%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $150k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementAnimalsPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA
    2× · 2017–2022 · $250k · revenue +78%
  • TN
    THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY
    3× · 2017–2024 · $215k · revenue +170%
  • PO
    PITTSBURGH OPERA INC
    3× · 2021–2024 · $55k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • PG
    PITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC
    one grant, 2023 · $250k · revenue -5%
  • ZS
    ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGHgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue +59%
  • DU
    DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRITgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +29%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

2
Western Pennsylvania Conservancy

The western pennsylvania conservancy protects and restores exceptional places to provide our region with clean waters and healthy forests, wildlife and natural areas for the benefit of present and future generations. the conservancy…

Environment
3
Pittsburgh Council On Higher Education

To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.

Education
4
Greater Pittsburgh Convention & Visitors Bureau Inc

Tourism development organization dedicated to expanding the tourism economy across allegheny county.

5
Carnegie Institute

To preserve and expand the resources of art and science as agents of personal growth and social advancement in pittsburgh and beyond.

Arts & Culture
6
Pennsylvania Academic Library Consortium Inc

To support education and research at college, university, and research libraries.

Education
7
Pittsburgh Ballet Theatre Inc

See schedule o for the description of pittsburgh ballet theatre inc.'s primary mission.the ballet is pittsburgh's source and ambassador for extraordinary ballet experiences that give life to the classical tradition, nurture new ideas and,…

Arts & Culture
8
Artphilly

The mission of artphilly is to amplify philadelphia's arts and culture by commissioning, presenting, producing, and promoting art of all kinds for local audiences and the world. its vision is to spotlight(continued on schedule o)the city…

Arts & Culture
9
Allegheny Conference On Community Development

See schedule othe allegheny conference on community development (accd) and affiliates - the greater pittsburgh chamber of commerce (chamber), the pennsylvania economy league of greater pittsburgh(pelgp) and the pittsburgh regional alliance…

10
The Pennsylvania Horticultural Society

Founded in 1827, the pennsylvania horticultural society (phs) uses horticulture to advance the health and well-being of the greater philadelphia region. (continued in sch o)phs's work focuses on four impact priorities: creating healthy…

Environment
11
Pennsylvania College of Art & Design

Pennsylvania college of art & design is a professional art college offering a bfa degree, certificates, credentials, and curricula that enable students of all ages to pursue art as their life's work.

Education
12
Pidc Development Management Corporation

Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Zoological Society of Pittsburgh and the most unlike its peers is Manchester Craftsmen's Guild. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
11/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $500,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPOINT PARK UNIVERSTIY PITTSBURGH PLAYHOUSE — $400,000 · OtherPOINT PARK UNIVERSTIY PITTSBURGH PLAYHOUSETHE ANDY WARHOL MUSEUM — $250,000 · OtherTHE ANDY WARHOL MUSEUMIndividual grant recipient — $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPITTSBURGH CIVIC LIGHT OPERA GUILD — $77,258 · OtherPITTSBURGH CIVIC LIGHT OPERA GUILD+3 more — $48,262 · OtherHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $250,000 · Arts & CultureHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF W…PITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC — $250,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER…PITTSBURGH OPERA INC — $55,000 · Arts & CulturePITTSBURGH OPERA INCTHEATREZONEINC — $30,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $20,000 · Arts & CultureALLEGHENY COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION — $306,000 · Community ImprovementALLEGHENY C…THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY — $215,000 · EducationTHE NEIGHB…DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT — $50,000 · EducationDUQUESNE U…+1 more — $5,100 · EducationRIVERLIFE — $150,000 · EnvironmentNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $15,000 · EnvironmentZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH — $100,000 · AnimalsNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · PhilanthropyPITTSBURGH PARKS CONSERVANCY — $1,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,425,520Arts & Culture$605,000Community Improvement$306,000Education$270,100Environment$165,000Animals$100,000Philanthropy$35,000Recreation & Sports$1,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALLEGHENY COUNTY PARKS FOUNDATION — $306,000 over 3y, 9.4% of budgetHISTORICAL SOCIETY OF WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA — $250,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetPITTSBURGH GLASS CENTER INC — $250,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY — $215,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetRIVERLIFE — $150,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF PITTSBURGH — $100,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPITTSBURGH OPERA INC — $55,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetDUQUESNE UNIVERSITY OF THE HOLY SPIRIT — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHEATREZONEINC — $30,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMANCHESTER CRAFTSMEN'S GUILD — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSweetwater Art Center — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH — $5,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MENDELSSOHN CHOIR OF PITTSBURGH — $3,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Heinz EndowmentsPA21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Heinz Endowments · Hillman Family Foundations · The Fine Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Eqt Foundation · Clapp G H Decd Char and Ed Tr · The Burke Family Foundation · The Burke Foundation · The Buhl Foundation · The Grable Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · The Simpson Family Foundation U/A Dtd 10/19/1999

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Charity Randall Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 3%
  • Naples Botanical Garden Inc3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Charity Randall Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Charity Randall Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph