· Private foundation
Charitable & Educational Trust Ua 7th of W/O Georges Lurcy Deceased
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 50% of CHARITABLE & EDUCATIONAL TRUST UA 7TH OF W/O GEORGES LURCY DECEASED’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k27 grants · $97k
- $10k–50k36 grants · $773k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $528k
- $250k+1 grant · $1.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SIDWELL FRIENDS SCHOOL | $1,561,000 |
| HARVARD LAW SCHOOL (ANNUAL FUND) | $95,000 |
| NEW YORK UNIVERSITY | $90,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO | $80,000 |
| COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $80,000 |
| TULANE UNIVERSITY | $72,500 |
| PRINCETON UNIVERSITY | $60,000 |
| AMHERST COLLEGE | $50,000 |
| MIAMI MUSIC PROJECT | $40,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE & MATHEMATICS EDUCATION | $40,000 |
| GABLES STAGE | $40,000 |
| GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION | $35,000 |
| DUKE UNIVERSITY | $30,000 |
| CORAL GABLES MUSEUM | $30,000 |
| STANFORD UNIVERSITY | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
91 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2025, 44 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $251k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND5× · 2021–2025 · $648k · revenue +25%
- ACAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES5× · 2021–2025 · $269k · revenue +46%
University of Chicago5× · 2021–2025 · $243k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2024 · $69k
GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITYone grant, 2022 · $45k · revenue +16%- SUSTANFORD UNIVERSITYone grant, 2023 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.
The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…
The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Walnut Hill Center for the Arts Inc and the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
97 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 97 of the 183 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GREATER MIAMI JEWISH FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds HATHAWAY BROWN SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MIAMI MUSIC PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds GABLESTAGE INC ↗
- Who funds ST MARK'S SCHOOL OF TEXAS ↗
- Who funds FAIRCHILD TROPICAL BOTANIC GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT TEAM INC ↗
- Who funds RANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY BALLET INC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK STUDIO SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE PHILHARMONIC SYMPHONY SOCIETY OF NY INC ↗
- Who funds NEW WORLD SYMPHONY INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds JUILLIARD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ROUNDABOUT THEATRE COMPANY INC ↗
- Who funds THE LOUISIANA PHILHARMONIC ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds University of Miami ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Batchelor Foundation Inc · The Miami Foundation Inc · The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Marilynn and John Hill Foundation Inc · Coral Gables Community Foundation Inc · The New York Community Trust · John S and James L Knight Foundation · Luther and Zita Templeman Foundation · The Usdin-Weil Foundation · Keller Family Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Goldring Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Charitable & Educational Trust Ua 7th of W/O Georges Lurcy Deceased funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Farm Share Inc — 6% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc — 4% of income from government
- Miami Music Project Inc — 2% of income from government
- Friends of Chamber Music — 1% of income from government
- New World Symphony Inc — 0% of income from government
- Amherst College Trustees — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Charitable & Educational Trust Ua 7th of W/O Georges Lurcy Deceased?
Find your warmest path to Charitable & Educational Trust Ua 7th of W/O Georges Lurcy Deceased through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.