Skip to content

Texas · Private foundation

Char Tua M H Wood & H G Wood

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$32k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
5
Grants FY2025
5
Organizations funded FY2024
20%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,500
Largest grant, FY2025
$7,500
Organizations funded a year
3 to 6
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
2
Total assets, FY2025
$760k
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 20% of the organizations Char Tua M H Wood & H G Wood funded were first-time grantees, receiving 23% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving5$32k80%
FY20245$33k20%
FY20235$38k20%
FY20225$38k40%
FY20215$31k40%
FY20205$30k40%
FY20196$45k33%
FY20183$15k0%
93% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$87kHuman Services$81kReligion$43kHousing & Shelter$28kInternational$10kFood & Nutrition$10kEducation$8kRecreation & Sports$5kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 12 grantees

Plus 8 recipients with no EIN on record ($176k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget Char Tua M H Wood & H G Wood supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetThe Presbyterian Night Shelter of Tarrant County: $27,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Partners of Tarrant County Inc: $17,500 over 2y, 12% of budgetEssilor Vision Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDental Health for Arlington Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTaste Project: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetThe Shaken Baby Alliance: $7,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTexas Scottish Rite Hospital for Crippled Children: $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGill Children's Services Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSpecial Olympics of Texas Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Enrichment Center Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLena Pope Home Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX20.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Helen Irwin Littauer Educational Trust · Amon G Carter Foundation · Ann L Rhodes and Carol Greene Rhodes · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Sid W Richardson Foundation · United Way of Tarrant County · Stein Family Charitable Trust · Adeline & George McQueen Foundation Xxxxx1007 · Paul E Andrews Jr Foundation · The Alcon Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare Char Tua M H Wood & H G Wood with peer funders

About Char Tua M H Wood & H G Wood

How much does Char Tua M H Wood & H G Wood give?
Char Tua M H Wood & H G Wood reported 5 grants totaling $31,500 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 6 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does Char Tua M H Wood & H G Wood fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Health (30%), Human Services (28%), Religion (15%).
Who are Char Tua M H Wood & H G Wood's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: The Presbyterian Night Shelter of Tarrant County ($28k), Community Partners of Tarrant County Inc ($18k), Essilor Vision Foundation ($10k).
Does Char Tua M H Wood & H G Wood fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does Char Tua M H Wood & H G Wood accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as Char Tua M H Wood & H G Wood?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Communities Foundation of Texas Inc, Helen Irwin Littauer Educational Trust, Amon G Carter Foundation.
Where is Char Tua M H Wood & H G Wood based?
Char Tua M H Wood & H G Wood is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Char Tua M H Wood & H G Wood’s filings →

More from the funding graph