Skip to content

· Public charity

Chapin Davis Foundation Inc

To provide charitable giving to the community to foster support of exempt organizations' activities

$69k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Religion$687kCommunity Improvement$226kHealth$218kEducation$202kArts & Culture$105kPhilanthropy$48kHuman Services$40kInternational$25kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $54,784, the rows itemized in this filing. The $69,380 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $14,596 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$14,784
Median grant
2
States reached
$34k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
League for People with Disabilities$20,000
Outer Banks Community Church$14,784
Baltimore Symphony Orchestra$10,000
Goucher College$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $230k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $70k → 19%League for People with Disabilities: $20k → 19%LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $20k → 19%LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $20k → 19%LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $20k → 19%LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $20k → 19%LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $20k → 19%LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $20k → 19%LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $10k → 19%LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.0M · 7 repeat orgs$494k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +58% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
15

Total granted

$1.0M
$494k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+2%

Still filing today

57%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureReligionHuman ServicesHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UB
    UNIVERSITY BAPTIST CHURCH OF BALTIMORE
    2× · 2019–2020 · $568k · revenue +14% · 26% of their budget
  • TL
    THE LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES
    9× · 2017–2025 · $230k · revenue +58%
  • GC
    GOUCHER COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • SC
    STRONG CITY BALTIMORE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $226k · revenue +42%
  • GP
    GRACE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2017 · $50k
  • EC
    EASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOIS
    one grant, 2022 · $48k · revenue -7%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
2
Wilson College

Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.

Education
3
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
4
Gettysburg College

Gettysburg college is a residential, undergraduate college of the liberal arts and sciences.

Education
5
Washington & Jefferson College

To graduate people of uncommon integrity, competence, and maturity, who are effective lifelong learners and responsible citizens, and who are prepared to contribute substantially to the world in which they live.

Education
6
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
7
Widener University

Empowering our community of learners to discover and create better futures.

Education
8
Columbia College

Columbia college improves lives by providing quality education to both traditional and nontraditional students, helping them achieve their true potential.

Education
9
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
10
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
11
DePauw University

Depauw university develops leaders the world needs through an uncommon commitment to the liberal arts. depauw's diverse and inclusive learning and living experience, distinctive in its rigorous intellectual engagement and its global and…

Education
12
Williams College

Williams College strives to achieve educational excellence by fostering a community of learning in collaboration with students, faculty, staff, devoted alumni and parents.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The League for People With Disabilities; the most unlike its peers is Open Society Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY BAPTIST CHURCH OF BALTIMORE: $567,521 · OtherUNIVERSITY BAPTIST CHURCH OF BALTIMORESTRONG CITY BALTIMORE INC: $226,149 · OtherSTRONG CITY BALTIMORE INCGRACE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $50,000 · OtherBROWN MEMORIAL PARK AVENUE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $39,752 · Other+7 more: $72,202 · Other+7 moreTHE LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $229,877 · Human ServicesTHE LEAGUE FOR P…GOUCHER COLLEGE: $89,832 · EducationGOUCHER C…CHESTNUT HILL COLLEGE: $25,000 · EducationCHESTNUT …WASHINGTON COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationWASHINGTO…WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC: $5,128 · EducationBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $89,373 · Arts & CultureBACH CHOIR OF BETHLEHEM: $10,007 · Arts & CultureWALTERS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $5,389 · Arts & CultureOPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE: $48,234 · PhilanthropyOUTER BANKS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $29,718 · PhilanthropyEASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $48,387 · HealthSERVANT GROUP INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 · Religion
Other$955,624Human Services$229,877Education$129,960Arts & Culture$104,769Philanthropy$77,952Health$48,387Religion$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY BAPTIST CHURCH OF BALTIMORE: $567,521 over 2y, 26% of budgetTHE LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES: $229,877 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetGOUCHER COLLEGE: $89,832 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC: $89,373 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOIS: $48,387 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE: $48,234 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOUTER BANKS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $29,718 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHESTNUT HILL COLLEGE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSERVANT GROUP INTERNATIONAL: $25,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetBACH CHOIR OF BETHLEHEM: $10,007 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWASHINGTON COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWALTERS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC: $5,389 over 1y, 9.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY BAPTIST CHURCH OF BALTIMORE ↗
  • Who funds THE LEAGUE FOR PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES ↗
  • Who funds STRONG CITY BALTIMORE INC ↗
  • Who funds GOUCHER COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BALTIMORE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC ↗
  • Who funds EASTERSEALS CENTRAL ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds OUTER BANKS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CHESTNUT HILL COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SERVANT GROUP INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds BACH CHOIR OF BETHLEHEM ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WALTERS ART MUSEUM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOMENS EDUCATION ALLIANCE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Baltimore Community Foundation IncMD17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · The US Charitable Gift Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chapin Davis Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chapin Davis Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Baltimore Symphony Orchestra Inc: 11% of income from government
  • Washington College: 0% of income from government
  • Goucher College: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Chapin Davis Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Chapin Davis Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chapin Davis’ filings →

More from the funding graph