Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chaney Family Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$149kHealth$73kHuman Services$59kEnvironment$33kPhilanthropy$6kAnimals$4kInternational$3kRecreation & Sports$2k
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$166k
Total assets

Anchored by a single position: about 99% of reported assets are held in Microsoft Stock.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST THOMAS MORE CATHOLIC CHURCH$20,000
ALPHA PHI FOUNDATION$6,000
FOUNDATION FOR THE AID OF THE ENVIRONMENT$6,000
ST JUDE'S RESEARCH CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$5,000
CENTRAL CATHOLIC$5,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES$5,000
DESCHUTES RIVER ALLIANCE$3,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE OF OREGON$3,000
LIVING DESERT ZOO AND GARDENS$2,000
WILD SALMON CENTER$2,000
OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,500
ST MARY'S ACADEMY$1,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NORTHWEST CHILDREN'S OUTREACH: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
NY
MA
OR
IN
CA
CO
VA
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$237k · 8 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
16

Total granted

$237k
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+13%

Still filing today

25%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentAnimalsEducationHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CC
    CENTRAL CATHOLIC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $86k
  • CC
    CATHOLIC CHARITIES
    5× · 2021–2025 · $45k
  • SJ
    ST JUDE'S RESEARCH CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $30k

Funded once

  • LF
    LITTLE FLOWER PARISH
    one grant, 2021 · $23k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • DL
    DE LA SALLE BLACKFEET SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
2
Western University of Health Sciences

To produce, in a humanistic tradition, health care professionals and biomedical knowledge that will enhance and extend the quality of life in our communities.

—
3
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
4
Western Rivers Conservancy

Western rivers conservancy's mission is to protect outstanding river ecosystems in the western united states. continued on schedule o.we acquire land to conserve critical habitat, provide public access for compatible use and enjoyment, and…

Environment
5
American Water Works Association

To promote public health, safety, and welfare through the improvement of the quality and quantity of drinking water and the development and furtherance of understanding of the problems relating thereto.

Public Benefit
6
National Association of Clean Water Agencies

Nacwa is the national voice of public clean water utilities, shaping water policy, convening a vibrant peer network, and empowering water leaders.

—
7
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
8
Western Electricity Coordinating Council

To effectively and efficiently mitigate risks to the reliability and security of the western interconnection's bulk power system.

Public Benefit
9
Agricultural Research Foundation

Our mission is to encourage facilitate support and engage in scientific investigation and research experimentation and to advance educational and training activities related to agriculture and natural resources throughout the state of…

—
10
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
11
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
12
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wild Salmon Center; the most unlike its peers is Northwest Childrens Outreach. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
3/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTRAL CATHOLIC: $86,000 · OtherCENTRAL CATHOLICCATHOLIC CHARITIES: $45,000 · OtherCATHOLIC CHARITIESST JUDE'S RESEARCH CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $30,000 · OtherST JUDE'S RESEARCH CHILDREN'S HOSPITALST MARYS ACADEMY: $29,000 · OtherST MARYS ACADEMYST THOMAS MORE CATHOLIC CHURCH: $27,000 · OtherST THOMAS MORE CATHOLIC CHURCHLITTLE FLOWER PARISH: $23,000 · OtherLITTLE FLOWER PARISHSALVATION ARMY: $10,000 · Other+10 more: $38,000 · Other+10 moreDESCHUTES RIVER ALLIANCE: $6,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $2,500 · EnvironmentLIVING DESERT THE: $2,000 · EnvironmentSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF OREGON AND SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON: $3,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · HealthALPHA PHI FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $2,000 · EducationWILD SALMON CENTER: $4,500 · AnimalsOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,500 · AnimalsNORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH: $3,000 · Human ServicesWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL: $2,500 · Philanthropy
Other$288,000Environment$10,500Health$9,000Education$8,000Animals$6,000Human Services$3,000Philanthropy$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetALPHA PHI FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDESCHUTES RIVER ALLIANCE: $6,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWILD SALMON CENTER: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF OREGON AND SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOREGON HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALPHA PHI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DESCHUTES RIVER ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds WILD SALMON CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST CHILDRENS OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF OREGON AND SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON ↗
  • Who funds WATER FIRST INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OREGON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
  • Who funds OREGON HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Blackbaud Giving FundSC10.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chaney Family Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chaney Family Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 49%
  • Wild Salmon Center: 49% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Chaney Family Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Chaney Family Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Chaney Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph