Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Champions for Christ Foundation In

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$148k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$53k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$753kReligion$193k
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $78k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $53k
$6,250
Median grant
6
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANDERSON UNIVERSITY$53,000
SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEO SEMINARY$29,600
DALLAS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY$18,000
SOUTHWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL$17,500
BOB JONES UNIVERSITY$12,500
NEW ORLEANS BAPTIST THEO SEMINARY$6,250
SOUTHEASTERN BAPTIST THEO SEMINARY$5,000
NORTH GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY$2,000
DALLAS INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY$1,500
DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY$1,500
MIDWESTERN BAPTIST THEO SEMINARY$1,000
CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY$600
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WESTMINSTER SEMINARY CALIFORNIA: $5k → 11%SOUTHWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL: $18k → 11%DALLAS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $26k → 14%BOB JONES UNIVERSITY: $21k → 10%ANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $53k → 15%PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE: $6k → 18%CONVENANT SEMINARY: $4k → 11%SOUTHEASTERN BAPTIST SEMINARY: $14k → 8%WESLEY SEMINARY: $6k → 19%LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $8k → 20%SAMUEL DEWITT PROCTOR SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY: $3k → 22%NEW ORLEANS BAPTIST THEO SEMINARY: $6k → 23%SOUTHERN BAPTIST SEMINARY: $40k → 15%SOUTHWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL: $9k → 11%DALLAS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $19k → 14%BOB JONES UNIVERSITY: $13k → 10%ANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $50k → 15%CONVENANT SEMINARY: $4k → 11%SOUTHEASTERN BAPTIST SEMINARY: $13k → 8%LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $7k → 20%SOUTHERN BAPTIST SEMINARY: $36k → 15%SOUTHWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL: $9k → 11%DALLAS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $19k → 14%BOB JONES UNIVERSITY: $7k → 10%ANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $46k → 15%SOUTHEASTERN BAPTIST SEMINARY: $12k → 8%LIBERTY UNIVERSITY: $4k → 20%SOUTHERN BAPTIST SEMINARY: $34k → 15%SOUTHWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL: $5k → 11%DALLAS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $18k → 14%BOB JONES UNIVERSITY: $3k → 10%ANDERSON UNIVERSITY: $29k → 15%SOUTHEASTERN BAPTIST SEMINARY: $10k → 8%SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEO SEMINARY: $33k → 15%DALLAS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $15k → 14%CONCORDIA SEMINARY: $7k → 11%SOUTHEASTERN BAPTIST SEMINARY: $8k → 8%SOUTHERN BAPTIST THEO SEMINARY: $30k → 15%DALLAS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $12k → 14%SOUTHEASTERN BAPTIST SEMINARY: $5k → 8%SOUTHERN BAPTIST SEMINARY: $26k → 15%DALLAS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $12k → 14%SOUTHEASTERN BAPTIST SEMINARY: $5k → 8%SOUTHERN BAPTIST SEMINARY: $15k → 15%DALLAS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $7k → 14%SOUTHERN BAPTIST SEMINARY: $13k → 15%DALLAS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $6k → 14%SOUTHERN BAPTIST SEMINARY: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
IN
NJ
CA
MO
KY
VA
NC
SC
LA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$924k · 23 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
9

Total granted

$924k
$19k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+19%

Still filing today

30%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $600 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AU
    ANDERSON UNIVERSITY
    4× · 2022–2025 · $177k · revenue +36%
  • DT
    Dallas Theological Seminary
    9× · 2017–2025 · $134k · revenue +81%
  • NG
    NORTH GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $124k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +11%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $3k
  • NO
    NEW ORLEANS BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY
    one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas Christian University

Texas christian university is an institution of higher education which includes nine major academic units: liberal arts, science and engineering, business, education, fine arts, communication, honors, nursing and health sciences, and the…

Education
2
Florida Southern College

Florida southern college (florida southern or the college) is committed to educational excellence and is a selective comprehensive, private, united methodist affiliated college with a strong liberal arts core and signature programs. (see…

Education
3
William Jessup University

In partnership with the church, the purpose of william jessup university is to educate transformational leaders for the glory of god.

4
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
5
Baylor University

The mission of baylor university is to educate men and women for worldwide leadership and service by integrating academic excellence and christian commitment within a caring community.

Education
6
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

7
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
8
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
9
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
10
Biola University Inc

Biola university is a private christian university located in southern california. for over 116 years, biola has stood out as an institution grounded on biblically centered education, intentional spiritual development, and career…

Education
11
Greensboro College

Greensboro College provides a liberal arts education grounded in the traditions of the United Methodist Church and fosters the intellectual, social, and spiritual development of all students while supporting their individual needs.

Education
12
Southern Wesleyan University

Southern wesleyan university is a christ-centered, student-focused learning community devoted to transforming lives by challenging students to be dedicated scholars and servant-leaders who impact the world for christ.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Greenville University and the most unlike its peers is Columbia International University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ANDERSON UNIVERSITY — $176,856 · EducationANDERSON UNIVERSITYDallas Theological Seminary — $134,055 · EducationDallas Theological SeminaryNORTH GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY — $123,930 · EducationNORTH GREENVILLE UNIVERSITYLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC — $24,550 · Education+6 more — $18,500 · EducationIndividual grant recipient — $173,621 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $66,918 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOUTHERN BAPTIST THEO SEMINARY — $62,220 · OtherSOUTHERN BAPTIST THEO SEMINARYBOB JONES UNIVERSITY — $43,100 · OtherBOB JONES UNIVERSITYSOUTHWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY — $43,020 · OtherSOUTHWESTERN BAPTIST THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY+18 more — $71,900 · Other+18 morePRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE — $6,400 · Housing & Shelter
Education$477,891Other$460,779Housing & Shelter$6,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetANDERSON UNIVERSITY — $176,856 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDallas Theological Seminary — $134,055 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNORTH GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY — $123,930 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetLIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC — $24,550 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY — $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE — $6,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDALLAS INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY — $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY — $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY — $800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY — $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANDERSON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds Dallas Theological Seminary
  • Who funds NORTH GREENVILLE UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds LIBERTY UNIVERSITY INC
  • Who funds DALLAS BAPTIST UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE
  • Who funds DALLAS INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds GARDNER-WEBB UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds COLUMBIA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE CORPORATION OF MERCER UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CHARLESTON SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA13.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Dick Horne Foundation · Watson-Brown Foundation Inc · South Carolina Christian Foundation · Folds of Honor Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Lilly Endowment Inc · Foundation for the Carolinas · Ibm International Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Champions for Christ Foundation In funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph