Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

Champaben Himatlal Sangani Charitable Foundation

Its FY2023 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$10k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0173% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172023.

Arts & Culture$95kPhilanthropy$65kInternational$6kHealth$6kFood & Nutrition$3kHuman Services$3kReligion$3kOther$67k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$756k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DFW Gujarati Samaj$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%TEXAS INDO AMERICAN PHYSICIANS SOCIETY: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$199k · 8 repeat orgs$48k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +142% since the first grant, against +79% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2023, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
16

Total granted

$199k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+142%
+79%

Still filing today

75%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23
Arts & CultureHealthInternationalPhilanthropyFood & NutritionReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DG
    DFW GUJARATI SAMAJ INC
    4× · 2018–2023 · $35k · revenue +142% · 57% of their budget
  • CM
    CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2021 · $4k · revenue +351%
  • AP
    AKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2018–2019 · $3k · revenue +151%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $15k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • WG
    WHEELS GLOBAL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +187%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Texas India Forum

To encourage cooperation between the usa and india and advance the shared values of democracy, inclusive economic development and mutual respect.

2
Radha Govind Dham Dallas

Religious Organization

Religion
3
Bengali Association of Greater Dfw

Promote and sustain cultural, educational, religious, literary and charitable activities on behalf of the bengali community in dfw area.

4
Gujaratis of North America
Arts & Culture
5
Telangana Peoples Association of Dallas

The nbsp;purpose nbsp;of nbsp;telangana nbsp;peoples nbsp;associatiom nbsp;of nbsp;dallas nbsp;(tpad) nbsp;is nbsp;to nbsp;conduct nbsp;telengana nbsp;( nbsp;a nbsp;region nbsp;in nbsp;india) nbsp;festivals nbsp;and nbsp;events nbsp;like…

Arts & Culture
6
Akhand Jyoti Usa

Eradicate cureable blindness, girls education, and women empowerment in the rural india

Health
7
Sampradaya Usa

Foster teachings of hindu religion

Religion
8
Flower Mound Hindu Temple

to promote and practice the ideals of Hindu religion through worship, education, and cultural activities, while striving for spiritual richness and human excellence

Religion
9
Sindhi Association of North America
10
Sharada Educational Foundation

To promote, foster, encourage, publish, teach, and disseminate sanatan vedic philosophy, as expressed in the classical principals of the vedanta.

Education
11
Hindu Temple of Frisco

The temple is organized to have a place of worship. operated exclusively for religious poojas/archanas, charitable and education purpose.

Religion
12
Indian Cultural Heritage Foundation

Ichf's primary exempt purpose is to promote intercultural awareness by providing a platform for the interaction between indian and american cultures through workshops, presentations, and performances.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saurashtra Patel Cultural Samaj and the most unlike its peers is Wheels Global Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAURASHTRA PATEL CULTURAL SAMAJ — $57,000 · Arts & CultureSAURASHTRA PATEL CULTURAL SAMAJDFW GUJARATI SAMAJ INC — $35,000 · Arts & CultureDFW GUJARATI SAMAJ INC+1 more — $3,000 · Arts & CultureSWAMINARAYAN GURUKUL-USA — $18,000 · OtherSWAMINARAYAN GURUKUL-USAIndividual grant recipient — $15,001 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $15,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUS India Chamber of Commerce Foundation DFW — $5,000 · OtherUS India Chamber of Commerce F…Individual grant recipient — $3,000 · Other+7 more — $5,500 · Other+7 morePRATHAM USA — $65,000 · PhilanthropyPRATHAM USAWHEELS GLOBAL FOUNDATION — $5,000 · InternationalSHRIMAD RAJCHANDRA LOVE AND CARE -USA INC — $1,000 · InternationalCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $4,000 · HealthSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA — $2,000 · HealthAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) — $3,300 · Food & NutritionTEXAS INDO-AMERICAN PHYSICIANS SOCIETY SW CHAPTER — $3,000 · Human ServicesDFW INDIAN CULTURAL SOCIETY — $2,500 · Religion
Arts & Culture$95,000Other$66,501Philanthropy$65,000International$6,000Health$6,000Food & Nutrition$3,300Human Services$3,000Religion$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPRATHAM USA — $65,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSAURASHTRA PATEL CULTURAL SAMAJ — $57,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetDFW GUJARATI SAMAJ INC — $35,000 over 4y, 57% of budgetWHEELS GLOBAL FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAKSHAYA PATRA FOUNDATION (USA) — $3,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS INDO-AMERICAN PHYSICIANS SOCIETY SW CHAPTER — $3,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetINDIA ASSOCIATION OF NORTH TEXAS — $3,000 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetDFW INDIAN CULTURAL SOCIETY — $2,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHRIMAD RAJCHANDRA LOVE AND CARE -USA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIGIVECATHOLIC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Verizon FoundationNJ11.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Verizon Foundation · Network for Good · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Champaben Himatlal Sangani Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph