Skip to content
Chaim Fanny Louis Benjamin Anne and Florence at a glance

· Private foundation

Chaim Fanny Louis Benjamin Anne and Florence

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$142k
Granted FY2026still arriving
9
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$211kPhilanthropy$156kHuman Services$132kReligion$118kHousing & Shelter$56kHealth$52kEducation$22kYouth Development$15kOther$0
02FY2026 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $132k
$10,450
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH FEDERATION OF METROPOLITAN DETROIT$45,000
HILLEL THE FOUNDATION$25,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF$20,000
PEWABIC SOCIETY$12,000
Individual grant recipient$10,450
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN$10,000
HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER$10,000
WALDORF SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF$5,000
KESHER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–26, $122k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF: $22k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF: $20k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $20k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF: $20k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF: $20k → 8%JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $15k → 8%KESHER: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$712k · 14 repeat orgs$72k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2026, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
9

Total granted

$712k
$67k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+2%
+21%

Still filing today

50%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25’26
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesEducationEmploymentHousing & ShelterPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE
    6× · 2020–2026 · $117k · revenue +120%
  • THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS
    4× · 2018–2021 · $100k · revenue +34%
  • TP
    THE PEWABIC SOCIETY INC
    7× · 2018–2026 · $80k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • YM
    YPSILANTI MEALS ON WHEELS
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +21%
  • GH
    GESHER HUMAN SERVICESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $15k · revenue +54%
  • KM
    KADIMA MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
    one grant, 2019 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jewish Historical Society of Michigan

Jewish historical society of michigan shares and celebrates the experiences and contributions of the jewish people, communities and institutions of michigan.

—
2
Jfa Non-Profit Housing Corporation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Housing & Shelter
3
Jewish Home and Aging Services

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

—
4
Hillel of Metropolitan Detroit

Inspire students to be active in jewish life.

Education
5
Jsl Foundation

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Human Services
6
Jewish Home Services Inc

Jewish senior life of metropolitan detroit is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life for older adults of the metropolitan detroit jewish community through the provision of personalized high quality programs and services that support…

Human Services
7
Jas Non-Profit Housing Corporation Vi

We nurture a sense of community and enrich the lives of older adults, while embracing jewish values and celebrating life.

Housing & Shelter
8
The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy
9
Detroit Historical Society

The Detroit Historical Society tells Detroit's stories and why they matter through its exhibits, programs, outreach, and the preservation and dissemination of its artifacts and collections.

Arts & Culture
10
Jewish Apartments and Services Inc

Jewish senior life of metropolitan detroit is dedicated to enhancing the quality of life for older adults of the metropolitan detroit jewish community through the provision of personalized high quality programs and services that support…

Human Services
11
The Michigan Glass Project
Public Benefit
12
Detroit Jews for Justice

Djj advances racial and economic justice by developing metro detroit jews as community organizers who fight for transformative policy change in deep partnership with neighbors

Civil Rights
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family Service; the most unlike its peers is Kesher. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
9/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HILLEL THE FOUNDATION: $108,000 · OtherHILLEL THE FOUNDATIONPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MID AND: $40,000 · OtherPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MID ANDISAAC AGREE DOWNTOWN SYNAGOGUE: $30,000 · OtherISAAC AGREE DOWNTOWN SYNAGOGUEKADIMA JEWISH SUPPORT SERVICES: $30,000 · OtherKADIMA JEWISH SUPPORT SERVICESIndividual grant recipient: $28,670 · OtherIndividual grant recipientJewish Federation of Metropolitan: $28,000 · OtherJewish Federation of MetropolitanYPSILANTI MEALS ON WHEELS: $15,000 · OtherFRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $15,000 · OtherKADIMA MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES: $12,000 · Other+3 more: $11,500 · OtherTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF AR…THE PEWABIC SOCIETY INC: $80,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PEWABIC SOCIETY INCHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC: $40,000 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER I…+2 more: $8,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $168,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF…+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $117,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH FAMILY …KESHER: $5,000 · Human ServicesREBUILDING TOGETHER SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN INC: $55,500 · Housing & ShelterWALDORF SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF MICH: $25,000 · EducationGESHER HUMAN SERVICES: $15,000 · EmploymentNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG: $15,000 · Community Improvement
Other$318,170Arts & Culture$228,000Philanthropy$173,000Human Services$122,000Housing & Shelter$55,500Education$25,000Employment$15,000Community Improvement$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT: $168,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE: $117,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS: $100,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PEWABIC SOCIETY INC: $80,000 over 7y, 0.8% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN INC: $55,500 over 4y, 3.3% of budgetHOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWALDORF SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF MICH: $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetYPSILANTI MEALS ON WHEELS: $15,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGESHER HUMAN SERVICES: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG: $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCULTURESOURCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLiving Arts: $3,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetOAKLAND LITERACY COUNCIL: $1,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF DETROIT ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE ↗
  • Who funds THE DETROIT INSTITUTE OF ARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE PEWABIC SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WALDORF SCHOOL ASSOCIATION OF MICH ↗
  • Who funds YPSILANTI MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds GESHER HUMAN SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN MICHIG ↗
  • Who funds CULTURESOURCE ↗
  • Who funds HEBREW FREE LOAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds KESHER ↗
  • Who funds Living Arts ↗
  • Who funds OAKLAND LITERACY COUNCIL ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Kresge FoundationCommunity Foundation …Harold and Penny B Bl…The Ravitz FoundationThe Eugene Applebaum …Marjorie and Maxwell …Max M & Marjorie S Fi…The Ralph C Wilson Jr…DTE Energy FoundationThe Harvey and Aileen…The Lisa and Brian Me…George M and Jo Elyn …
The Kresge FoundationMI17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Kresge Foundation · Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan · Harold and Penny B Blumenstein Foundation Corporation · The Ravitz Foundation · The Eugene Applebaum Family Foundation · Marjorie and Maxwell Jospey Foundation · Max M & Marjorie S Fisher Foundation Inc · The Ralph C Wilson Jr Foundation · DTE Energy Foundation · The Harvey and Aileen Kleiman Family Foundation · The Lisa and Brian Meer Foundation · George M and Jo Elyn Nyman Charitable Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chaim Fanny Louis Benjamin Anne and Florence funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chaim Fanny Louis Benjamin Anne and Florence. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chaim Fanny Louis Benjamin Anne and Florence’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home