Skip to content

· Private foundation

Chad Campana Memorial Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$9k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$109kHealth$38kInternational$32kRecreation & Sports$29kHousing & Shelter$22kReligion$21kYouth Development$15kAnimals$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER RICHMOND SCAN$5,000
MAKE A WISH GREATER VIRGINIA$3,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BE THE LIGHT: $2k → 7%FULL CIRCLE GRIEF CENTER: $5k → 6%BE THE LIGHT: $2k → 7%FULL CIRCLE GRIEF CENTER: $3k → 6%FULL CIRCLE GRIEF CENTER: $2k → 6%THE CAMERON K GALLAGHER FOUNDATION: $500 → 6%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $14k → 22%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $5k → 22%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $4k → 22%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $4k → 22%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $4k → 22%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $3k → 22%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $2k → 22%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $2k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$271k · 20 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

20 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
7

Total granted

$271k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+29%

Still filing today

70%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentReligionHealthRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CZ
    COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $37k · revenue +68%
  • TR
    Triple R Ranch Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $29k · revenue +50%
  • VO
    Vessels of Mercy International Inc
    4× · 2017–2020 · $28k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $4k
  • WG
    WORLD GOSPEL MISSION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • C
    CARITASgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Adult & Teen Challenge Virginia Inc

All Adult & Teen Challenge programs are designed and dedicated to helping and healing teens and young adults who are in crisis situations, those in addiction and in recovery from life-controlling issues. Working with families seeking help…

Health
2
Reach Youth Global

Reach Youth Global exists to "Elevate Lives and Cultivate Hope" in the lives of children and youth around the world.

Philanthropy
3
Youth With a Mission Costa Rica

To know god and make him known.

International
4
Victory Center Ministries Inc

Victory Center Ministries is dedicated to providing services for families, men, and women with children in need. Most importantly, a caring and supportive environment is provided where lives are changed and individuals regain their…

Religion
5
United Methodist Family Services of Virginia

Shineforth Child & Family Services is the unwavering champion that every child deserves, and our vision is to strengthen humanity, one child at a time. Shineforth operates eight offices across Virginia and offers more than a dozen…

Human Services
6
Richmond Christian School Inc

Richmond Christian School exists to support families in their Biblical responsibility to nurture and train their children. Thus, Richmond Christian School provides opportunities which allow students to realize their God-given potential.

Education
7
Victory Homes for Boys Inc

Victory Academy for Boys is a Biblically-based organization dedicated to providing biblical, Christian, and academic achievement programs for at-risk teens and counseling for the families of at-risk children.

—
8
Virginia Mennonite Home Inc

We are a christ-centered community cultivating compassion, integrity and respect for aging well and living fully.

Health
9
ForRichmond

For Richmond convenes city wide events and presentations, prayer meetings and worship services to promote unity in the city of Richmond among Christians by building trusted relationships between churches and leaders, while doing good for…

—
10
Christian City Home for Children Inc

Our mission is to be a safe haven for children and to provide them with a loving, nurturing environment. children's village provides life changing hope for children who are victims of neglect, abuse or abandonment through licensed…

—
11
Victory Family Services
Human Services
12
Commonwealth Catholic Charities

To provide quality, compassionate human services to all people, especially the most vulnerable, regardless of faith, by empowering individuals, streghening families and building community through faith and service.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cross-Over Ministry Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hanover Humane Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/21
Grantees still filing
12/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW LIFE FOR YOUTH INC: $40,625 · OtherNEW LIFE FOR YOUTH INCELIJAH HOUSE ACADEMY: $8,000 · OtherELIJAH HOUSE ACADEMYCHIDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF VA: $7,500 · OtherCHIDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF VAPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER: $6,000 · OtherPREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTERPRC OF METRO RICHMOND: $4,500 · OtherHANOVER HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $10,500 · OtherHANOVER HUMANE SOCIETY INCGREATER RICHMOND SCAN - STOP CHILD ABUSE NOW INC: $10,000 · OtherGREATER RICHMOND SCAN - STOP CHILD ABUSE …HIVES FOR HEROES: $6,000 · OtherHIVES FOR HEROES+5 more: $13,000 · Other+5 moreCOMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $36,500 · Human ServicesCOMFORT ZONE CAMP I…FULL CIRCLE GRIEF CENTER: $9,500 · Human ServicesFULL CIRCLE GRIEF C…BE THE LIGHT: $4,000 · Human ServicesBE THE LIGHT+1 more: $500 · Human ServicesVessels of Mercy International Inc: $28,125 · ReligionVessels of Merc…Ascent College: $12,000 · ReligionAscent CollegeTriple R Ranch Inc: $28,500 · Recreation & SportsTriple R Ra…THE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC: $23,000 · HealthTHE CROSS-…MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER VIRGINIA: $3,500 · HealthMAKE-A-WIS…LIBERATION VETERAN SERVICES INC: $14,000 · Housing & ShelterURBAN HOPE INC: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterCARITAS: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterCELEBRATE RVA: $8,500 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $4,500 · Youth DevelopmentBLUE SKY FUND: $2,000 · Youth Development
Other$106,125Human Services$50,500Religion$40,125Recreation & Sports$28,500Health$26,500Housing & Shelter$22,000Youth Development$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW LIFE FOR YOUTH INC: $40,625 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetCOMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $36,500 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTriple R Ranch Inc: $28,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetVessels of Mercy International Inc: $28,125 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetTHE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC: $23,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetLIBERATION VETERAN SERVICES INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAscent College: $12,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetHANOVER HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $10,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetGREATER RICHMOND SCAN - STOP CHILD ABUSE NOW INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFULL CIRCLE GRIEF CENTER: $9,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCELEBRATE RVA: $8,500 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetELIJAH HOUSE ACADEMY: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHIVES FOR HEROES: $6,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetURBAN HOPE INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBE THE LIGHT: $4,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER VIRGINIA: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCARITAS: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Cameron K Gallagher Foundation: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW LIFE FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds Triple R Ranch Inc ↗
  • Who funds Vessels of Mercy International Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE CROSS-OVER MINISTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds LIBERATION VETERAN SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Ascent College ↗
  • Who funds HANOVER HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER RICHMOND SCAN - STOP CHILD ABUSE NOW INC ↗
  • Who funds FULL CIRCLE GRIEF CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CELEBRATE RVA ↗
  • Who funds ELIJAH HOUSE ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds HIVES FOR HEROES ↗
  • Who funds URBAN HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds BE THE LIGHT ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds CARITAS ↗
  • Who funds BLUE SKY FUND ↗
  • Who funds The Cameron K Gallagher Foundation ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA25.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Herndon Foundation · Robins Foundation · The Mary Morton Parsons Foundation · Carmax Foundation · Shelton H Short Jr Trust · The Pauley Family Foundation · Coleman a Hunter - Irr Tr Chari · Robert G Cabell III and Maude Morgan Cabell Foundation · Virginia Nonprofit Housing Coalition · Richard S Reynolds Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Chad Campana Memorial Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Chad Campana Memorial Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Chad Campana Memorial’s filings →

    More from the funding graph